'J' to 'C' heads and a dual exhaust question..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 04:47 AM
  #1  
73aussie455's Avatar
Thread Starter
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 369
From: Great Southern Taxland...
'J' to 'C' heads and a dual exhaust question..

Not sure where to put this.. here will do

I've found 2 pairs of heads for my '73 smog Delta to replace the J units, no mean feat finding any here in oz..

One pair is the C heads from a 455 (394548) and the others are B heads from a '65 425 (383821).

Am I correct in thinking the C units will go straight on and easily out flow the J's?
The exhaust manifolds from the J heads should also bolt straight up to the C heads?
I found an old edelbrock dual plane performer intake manifold to sit the original 4bbl 800cfm Qjet carby on.

I am ditching the single pipe and going to a dual 2.5" exhaust with free flowing cans at the same time, is it simply a matter of blanking off the crossover on the R/H exhaust manifold on this model?

I dont want a race car, just get the thing breathing and rumbling like it's suppose to..

Hopefully I'm on the right track and the old girl wakes up and comes to life! Cheers

Last edited by 73aussie455; Aug 18, 2013 at 04:56 AM.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 06:16 AM
  #2  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 73aussie455
One pair is the C heads from a 455 (394548) and the others are B heads from a '65 425 (383821).

Am I correct in thinking the C units will go straight on and easily out flow the J's?
Either set will bolt on and outflow the J heads. Either set could have come from a motor with a 45 deg lifter bank angle, so you have to check pushrod clearance as you may need to open the pushrod holes slightly.

The exhaust manifolds from the J heads should also bolt straight up to the C heads?
All Olds heads have the same exhaust flange bolt pattern, so yes.

I am ditching the single pipe and going to a dual 2.5" exhaust with free flowing cans at the same time, is it simply a matter of blanking off the crossover on the R/H exhaust manifold on this model?
On the 1971-76 family of full size cars, Olds actually used dedicated dual exhaust manifolds on the BBO cars (and yes, I know there were no factory dual exhaust cars after the 1974 model year). The W/Z manifolds used on the A-body cars work on the full size. You can get repros. Capping the current manifolds works, it just won't be very efficient and you'll need to have a custom pipe bent for the driver's side.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 06:50 AM
  #3  
73aussie455's Avatar
Thread Starter
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 369
From: Great Southern Taxland...
Thanks Joe. Does either the B or C heads have an advantage over the other? valve size, etc?
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 08:25 AM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 73aussie455
Thanks Joe. Does either the B or C heads have an advantage over the other? valve size, etc?
Either casting could have come with large or small valves. The only way to know is to measure the intake valves. Otherwise, on your stock motor with low compression and mild cam in a heavy car, the difference between the two will be negligible.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 09:21 AM
  #5  
oldstata's Avatar
Justin
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,454
From: utah
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Either casting could have come with large or small valves. The only way to know is to measure the intake valves. Otherwise, on your stock motor with low compression and mild cam in a heavy car, the difference between the two will be negligible.
Hey joe, I have read about the 73-76 blocks having non dished pistons and that they lowered compressen through the heads.
I have not seen this I was wondering if this could be a factor here ?
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 09:30 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldstata
Hey joe, I have read about the 73-76 blocks having non dished pistons and that they lowered compressen through the heads.
I have not seen this I was wondering if this could be a factor here ?
I don't know where you read this, but it is not correct. All BBO heads have about 80cc chambers except the 68-69 D heads, which have about 72cc chambers. Note that these are the blueprint numbers, not the as-cast numbers. The latter will typically be a few cc larger.

And if you've ever seen the pistons on a 73-76 BBO, there's a chance you'll mistake them for soup bowls.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 10:24 AM
  #7  
oldstata's Avatar
Justin
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,454
From: utah
Joe , I thought I read it on olds FAQ but I can't seem to find it again so I am unsure where I have read it .
I didn't nesseraly believe it just didn't know if it was true

Thanks for clearing that up
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 12:55 PM
  #8  
Seff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
The FAQ states that SBO heads from '73 onwards have larger chambers, and those same engines have flat(ish) pistons. So a 64-72 head on a 73+ engine would help compression. I think that's what you got mixed up.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 01:01 PM
  #9  
oldstata's Avatar
Justin
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 3,454
From: utah
Originally Posted by Seff
The FAQ states that SBO heads from '73 onwards have larger chambers, and those same engines have flat(ish) pistons. So a 64-72 head on a 73+ engine would help compression. I think that's what you got mixed up.
Thanks this seems like what I was thinking so I mixed up SBO with BBO
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djcrook73
Ninety-Eight
12
Dec 12, 2012 02:09 PM
65OldsDelta88SuperRocket
Big Blocks
2
Oct 27, 2011 09:16 PM
wjustinmartin
Big Blocks
13
Feb 18, 2010 05:45 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 AM.