Iron vs Ported aluminum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 9th, 2013, 11:00 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,892
Iron vs Ported aluminum

I realize there are issues with this comparison, i.e. different dyno, conditions, and intake. But there are also too many similarities to ignore so nevertheless I think this shows the potential of aftermarket heads vs irons.

Jmo.

http://realoldspower.prophpbb.com/po...c20345d#p25105

Last edited by cutlassefi; November 9th, 2013 at 02:09 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 9th, 2013, 03:30 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
matt69olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: central Indiana
Posts: 5,341
So, I guess the next logical question should be "Is almost 100 hp worth the money for aluminum heads?"

To me, its a no brainier. The money spent to properly rebuild cast iron heads would come real close to aftermarket heads. Then spend the extra money to either port the cast iron stuff, or try to enjoy the car knowing you have quite a bit of untapped potential.

Unless you stumble across a cheap pair of rebuilt iron heads or are building a stock appearing engine the factory stuff time has passed.
matt69olds is online now  
Old November 10th, 2013, 01:37 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Lars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dewey AZ
Posts: 314
they way I see it is paying someone to port and flow iron pays for the aluminum in stock form.
Lars is offline  
Old November 10th, 2013, 01:39 PM
  #4  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
I'm going procomps for the shortblock I'm currently building. I want to run more compression and the aluminums will alow that. Probably buying a set this winter.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 10th, 2013, 04:01 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,793
Nice comparison Mark. A big difference with very similar setups.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old November 10th, 2013, 06:57 PM
  #6  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 9,007
For the BBO, an absolute no brainer. The SBO 350 is tougher, bigger runners, milling the head and intake, necessary electric fuel pump, roller rockers and MLS gaskets. You can get away without milling on the 403 with Arias pistons and runners would fine on it too. It would nice to be able to buy a ready to bolt on set with 10cc smaller chambers. I realize we are a tiny market but two chamber sizes would be nice.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 10th, 2013, 07:14 PM
  #7  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
I think for an sbo street strip build that will wind up high enough it's still good. It's worth it to be able to run higher compression on the street and a better combustion chamber . Even if you run iron heads you will need to mill them for compression. I have 1500 sunk into a set of #6's that have everything done but port work along with the intake and valvetrain parts.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old November 12th, 2013, 09:06 AM
  #8  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 9,007
I know cost is close, when properly rebuilt. In may case to even hit 9 to 1 with 14cc pistons is much easier with iron heads. Chamber is close plus I can use .011" shim head gaskets. I can get a 69 350 for $200 right now, needs an overhaul. On the 424, if I ever get it done, I would have to be a retard to run iron heads. Too bad the Olds 350 is ignored.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 12th, 2013, 09:25 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,824
Nice comparison it would be interesting how a good ported iron head would have run on the same engine.
I know the aluminum head would come out on top but it would be cool to see how close a well ported iron would stack up on the same engine, would it be with in 50hp?
I think the only reason anyone would want to stick with the iron heads is to keep the car original, or the challenge of running good numbers with a iron headed Olds. There is also the cool factor there is a 9 sec c head engine thread on ROP right know.

Last edited by Bernhard; November 12th, 2013 at 09:32 AM.
Bernhard is offline  
Old November 12th, 2013, 09:51 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
brownbomber77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,471
For those of us who port our own heads...it still kills me, my machinist doesn't charge much, so even with new valves, springs, locks, retainers, studs, and guide plates, I'm still in $800 in heads....but I'm cheap....arrrgh....whyyy do they have to make a cheap alternative??? haha
brownbomber77 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dynamic63
General Discussion
3
April 23rd, 2014 08:43 PM
Mongoose
Parts For Sale
11
March 24th, 2014 01:54 PM
Wise Performance
Parts For Sale
9
December 27th, 2013 01:17 PM
joepenoso
Big Blocks
21
November 23rd, 2011 01:13 PM
RATCHETMASTER
Small Blocks
3
October 29th, 2011 06:27 PM



Quick Reply: Iron vs Ported aluminum



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:45 PM.