Engine Dyno Results!!!
#43
I should have, you're right! I just drove it for the first time tonight...wow! 40MPH stomp breaks the 295/50's loose...I guess I need some stickier tires lol!
#44
Looking good man! I guarantee you need some sticky tires lol. My hp/tq numbers are slightly lower than what you're running and without the Drag Radials and LCA relocation brackets the thought of traction is just a joke on my 275's.
#45
I didn't have the shop that did the machine work do the dyno because at the time I wasn't going to have it dyno'd, and I assembled the longblock myself. Another reason is that I wanted DaVinci to tune the carburetor and didn't want to make him drive 20 miles to the other machine shop.
Thanks Bill! I know I need them, the 295/50's I've got won't stop spinning in 2nd gear unless I let out of the throttle...and I've got Southside Machine (RIP) lower drag bars, no shocks up front (yet), and posi rear. I've got drag radials in the garage but I still need to mount them. I plan on running it in 3 weeks, we'll see if that holds.
Last edited by ah64pilot; October 14th, 2011 at 11:53 PM. Reason: Added "what I had to give them"
#46
I like your build, its just about exactly what i plan to do with my 72' supreme. I plan to make it triple black and clone it to a 71' SX, painting the 455 gold, more just because i like a gold motor better than blue, everyone has blue motors its a pretty boring color anymore honestly. Gold just stands out. I planned to have 442 grills in mine too, hurst dual gate shifter, and a very similar build in the motor cept mine will have stock high compression 69' pistons and Ga iron heads but the rest will be almost the exact same. I hope my numbers turn out close to yours! Id be bummed if not having edelbrocks killed a decent chunk of my performance haha. Also im interested in just how much performance is gained from boring it out. I almost think its more of just something to do to rebuild the block and get the cylinders working properly again than to really gain any performance. Just my 2 cents haha. Love the build, gives me great insight into my project!
#47
I like your build, its just about exactly what i plan to do with my 72' supreme. I plan to make it triple black and clone it to a 71' SX, painting the 455 gold, more just because i like a gold motor better than blue, everyone has blue motors its a pretty boring color anymore honestly. Gold just stands out. I planned to have 442 grills in mine too, hurst dual gate shifter, and a very similar build in the motor cept mine will have stock high compression 69' pistons and Ga iron heads but the rest will be almost the exact same. I hope my numbers turn out close to yours! Id be bummed if not having edelbrocks killed a decent chunk of my performance haha. Also im interested in just how much performance is gained from boring it out. I almost think its more of just something to do to rebuild the block and get the cylinders working properly again than to really gain any performance. Just my 2 cents haha. Love the build, gives me great insight into my project!
Maybe Brian or Mark will look at this and give you their recommendations. I would tend to think you'd be looking at around 425-450 hp with the setup you are contemplating depending on how much you work the heads.
#48
Stephen,
Glad you had fun at Faerman's and with Dan. I may have told you, but that is where I dyno'ed my previous SBF (I won't post the numbers ). My headers wouldn't fit the dyno, and I had to run over to Westside Performance to borrow a set - I could have used THEM to dyno the motor, and they charged less!! Then, we had to use my motor mounts, and one of them BROKE on about the 9th pull - which scared the hell out of ALL of us. Of course, *I* had to go find some other motor mounts.... I still got about 15 or so pulls that day, and got to know Dan much better.
Oh, turn that Blaster II coil to point upwards. They have a plastic membrane sealing the oil to the coils, and it has a tendency to leak, killing the coil. Those coils tend to last longer when you orient them so that the membrane is there just for backup, not being constantly used.
Lee
Glad you had fun at Faerman's and with Dan. I may have told you, but that is where I dyno'ed my previous SBF (I won't post the numbers ). My headers wouldn't fit the dyno, and I had to run over to Westside Performance to borrow a set - I could have used THEM to dyno the motor, and they charged less!! Then, we had to use my motor mounts, and one of them BROKE on about the 9th pull - which scared the hell out of ALL of us. Of course, *I* had to go find some other motor mounts.... I still got about 15 or so pulls that day, and got to know Dan much better.
Oh, turn that Blaster II coil to point upwards. They have a plastic membrane sealing the oil to the coils, and it has a tendency to leak, killing the coil. Those coils tend to last longer when you orient them so that the membrane is there just for backup, not being constantly used.
Lee
#49
Stephen,
Glad you had fun at Faerman's and with Dan. I may have told you, but that is where I dyno'ed my previous SBF (I won't post the numbers ). My headers wouldn't fit the dyno, and I had to run over to Westside Performance to borrow a set - I could have used THEM to dyno the motor, and they charged less!! Then, we had to use my motor mounts, and one of them BROKE on about the 9th pull - which scared the hell out of ALL of us. Of course, *I* had to go find some other motor mounts.... I still got about 15 or so pulls that day, and got to know Dan much better.
Oh, turn that Blaster II coil to point upwards. They have a plastic membrane sealing the oil to the coils, and it has a tendency to leak, killing the coil. Those coils tend to last longer when you orient them so that the membrane is there just for backup, not being constantly used.
Lee
Glad you had fun at Faerman's and with Dan. I may have told you, but that is where I dyno'ed my previous SBF (I won't post the numbers ). My headers wouldn't fit the dyno, and I had to run over to Westside Performance to borrow a set - I could have used THEM to dyno the motor, and they charged less!! Then, we had to use my motor mounts, and one of them BROKE on about the 9th pull - which scared the hell out of ALL of us. Of course, *I* had to go find some other motor mounts.... I still got about 15 or so pulls that day, and got to know Dan much better.
Oh, turn that Blaster II coil to point upwards. They have a plastic membrane sealing the oil to the coils, and it has a tendency to leak, killing the coil. Those coils tend to last longer when you orient them so that the membrane is there just for backup, not being constantly used.
Lee
Hey, I believe I am going to try to hit Baytown on the first week of November. I've got to get some drag radials mounted and drive it a little more before we go. I'll let you know, it would be cool to meet you in person!
#50
Did you test different valve lashes? On my solid roller SBF, I found nearly 15hp peak and 25 midrange by playing with the lash (rwhp).
Let me know about going to the track. If you still have my e-mail, that will be the best way to get ahold of me.
Lee
Let me know about going to the track. If you still have my e-mail, that will be the best way to get ahold of me.
Lee
#51
I really didn't...I set it at .020" - .022" and let it be. I guess I could have, it may have put me over 500 Kinda sad I didn't now! I've got your email, I just sent one...
Thanks for the coil tip, I'll change it around tomorrow!
Thanks for the coil tip, I'll change it around tomorrow!
#52
I am not trying to be a buzz kill...I don't know if you're going to make that kind of power with Ga heads. My true compression is 10.63:1 with IC886's that are flat top w/ 14cc valve reliefs, a .040" gasket, and 77cc Edelbrock heads. I don't know what the dish size is the '69 pistons but I know the Ga heads have large chambers. You may have a hard time getting over 10:1 compression. Also, the Edelbrocks flow just about what a lightly ported "C" head flows...the Ga's don't come close to that. You can do it, but you are going to have those heads worked considerably.
Maybe Brian or Mark will look at this and give you their recommendations. I would tend to think you'd be looking at around 425-450 hp with the setup you are contemplating depending on how much you work the heads.
Maybe Brian or Mark will look at this and give you their recommendations. I would tend to think you'd be looking at around 425-450 hp with the setup you are contemplating depending on how much you work the heads.
#53
Ah64pilot has a great build and shows how HP can be made. The Edelbrocks flow nice out of the box and have been out on the market for about 12 or so years. And a great bang for your buck.
I had the heads from my 70 w30 ported and flowed by AFR in the 90's and they flowed better than edelbrocks. However, the price of the port work was very expensive.
You will need to have your block decked, and have your heads flat milled to get a disered compression ratio, and then you may have detenation problems. As to where if you used edelbrocks you will have a lesser chance for detenation due the head being aluminum.
Good luck with your build.
I had the heads from my 70 w30 ported and flowed by AFR in the 90's and they flowed better than edelbrocks. However, the price of the port work was very expensive.
You will need to have your block decked, and have your heads flat milled to get a disered compression ratio, and then you may have detenation problems. As to where if you used edelbrocks you will have a lesser chance for detenation due the head being aluminum.
Good luck with your build.
#59
If I play with it how would I know whether or not I'm making more power? I don't trust my proprioceptive senses (seat of the pants).
#60
#62
The dyno is the most accurate method. With the engine on the stand, at a nice workable height, in a climate controlled room.... With that opportunity lost, I'd suggest the chassis dyno.
It takes more work and time on a chassis dyno, but it is more accurate and easier than doing it at the track - especially since it is hard to get more than 4 or 5 passes during a whole night in Baytown, with so many people there.
My cam card said to lash at .026/.026 (UltraDyne solid roller). After several rounds of testing, .021/.024 made more power everywhere. 0.002" either way of the intake lash (.021) and I lost several hp.
It takes more work and time on a chassis dyno, but it is more accurate and easier than doing it at the track - especially since it is hard to get more than 4 or 5 passes during a whole night in Baytown, with so many people there.
My cam card said to lash at .026/.026 (UltraDyne solid roller). After several rounds of testing, .021/.024 made more power everywhere. 0.002" either way of the intake lash (.021) and I lost several hp.
#63
The dyno is the most accurate method. With the engine on the stand, at a nice workable height, in a climate controlled room.... With that opportunity lost, I'd suggest the chassis dyno.
It takes more work and time on a chassis dyno, but it is more accurate and easier than doing it at the track - especially since it is hard to get more than 4 or 5 passes during a whole night in Baytown, with so many people there.
My cam card said to lash at .026/.026 (UltraDyne solid roller). After several rounds of testing, .021/.024 made more power everywhere. 0.002" either way of the intake lash (.021) and I lost several hp.
It takes more work and time on a chassis dyno, but it is more accurate and easier than doing it at the track - especially since it is hard to get more than 4 or 5 passes during a whole night in Baytown, with so many people there.
My cam card said to lash at .026/.026 (UltraDyne solid roller). After several rounds of testing, .021/.024 made more power everywhere. 0.002" either way of the intake lash (.021) and I lost several hp.
I'll hit you up for the chassis dyno when it's time for it I wanna get the electric fuel pump installed before I do that. I'm gonna run it like it is for now, just to get a base timeslip for it. I'm running a stock fuel pump because I don't have money right now for the electric setup and no one makes a mechanical setup that clears Edelbrocks, uh hem BRIAN TRICK!
Anyway, I hooked up the power brake booster tonight...works at cruise at least lol! And I fixed the coil like you suggested And I washed and detailed it...first time since it was painted!
#64
#65
It's a little later than expected but we will have 1/4 mile timeslips after next weekend. We are planning to go on Feb. 10 so long as the weather holds out. Look for updates after then...thanks!
Steve
Steve
#66
Steve
Good luck with the run coming up. Hopefully you won't have to put a roll cage in for any other runs if you know what I mean
I may run mine this year at MIR but need to do some suspension work first. Might need to put disc brakes up front first also. The 70 series tires in the back won't work either.
Be safe.
Good luck with the run coming up. Hopefully you won't have to put a roll cage in for any other runs if you know what I mean
I may run mine this year at MIR but need to do some suspension work first. Might need to put disc brakes up front first also. The 70 series tires in the back won't work either.
Be safe.
#67
Dan, I do too...I've got big block springs up front with no shocks and the car is still stiff as a brick. With all the aluminum up front and the fiberglass hood it doesn't move at all. I'm taking it to get a baseline, then I'll put Moroso springs and QA1 shocks on it. I've just been waiting to get it all done before I take it but I am running out of patience. I'm itching to run it!
Steve
Steve
#68
AH64 pilot, 11k is good value for that build and it will live. I got over 8K in this 455, very similar build except my E-heads are out of the box. I did have the Torker port matched to the heads though. Your in Houston? Lot of Texas guys in this forum. Maybe some of us could plan a meet?? I installed a Holley125 electric pump, this one has a built in pressure regulator, reads right at 7psi. But the BIG the THING is Your thread has got me stoked for my 425 build for the 64 post.
IMG_1271.jpg
DSCN1723-1.jpg
IMG_1271.jpg
DSCN1723-1.jpg
#69
AH64 pilot, 11k is good value for that build and it will live. I got over 8K in this 455, very similar build except my E-heads are out of the box. I did have the Torker port matched to the heads though. Your in Houston? Lot of Texas guys in this forum. Maybe some of us could plan a meet?? I installed a Holley125 electric pump, this one has a built in pressure regulator, reads right at 7psi. But the BIG the THING is Your thread has got me stoked for my 425 build for the 64 post.
#70
***I KNOW you know what I'm talking about...
#72
I have access to a Mustang Dyno,chassis dyno about 1 mile from my house.I have the engine dynoed to get a good baseline,to get it running before it goes in the car,then it goes on the chassis dyno.That way,the engine can be tuned to the exact car that it is in.This is different than a Dyno-Jet,where it just spins a drum.With the Mustang Dyno,we enter all the data possible,engine,trans,weight of car,etc.,which places a drag on the drum.This way you get the actual HP that is at the rear wheels as if you were driving the car down the raod.We are also able to make 1/4 mile passes on it.It is one of the most accurate dynos out there.My car will run in the same tenth on that dyno,as it does at the track,and when I leave,I know it's tuned the best it can be.I have also been able to make the drivability better,by looking at where the engine needed improvement.
#73
Big block springs up front? In the '60s and early '70s, guys just went w/ 6 cyl. springs up front to get the weight transfer needed. I do know there are high dollar springs and shocks out there that work well. Anything to get the power to the pavement and not "up in smoke."
#74
No, I was saying I did the front end but I put the big block springs back in because I didn't have the extra money for new springs. I'm going to run the car this Friday like it is, but will get Moroso trick springs later this month. After doing the front end last year, I wasn't exactly motivated to tear it all apart to put springs in it lol!
#75
Times aren't even worth posting...the stock fuel pump is extremely insufficient for this build. The car is nosing over going into 2nd gear and never catches up. Turning off the track and heading back into pits car has a hung idle to 1800 RPM's. Will be installing an electric fuel pump setup and heading back out.
Steve
Steve
#76
Woohoo! Nothing like a free Holley Blue 120 gph pump, regulator, and filter to get you motivated! Now all I've got to do is plumb this thing, any tips would be greatly appreciated.
Getting RobbMC 1/2" pickup w/ -10 AN fittings, plan on getting -10 AN braided hose to filter, pump, regulator, then -8 AN braided hose to carb. Good? Bad?
Steve
Getting RobbMC 1/2" pickup w/ -10 AN fittings, plan on getting -10 AN braided hose to filter, pump, regulator, then -8 AN braided hose to carb. Good? Bad?
Steve
#77
I use two #8s from cell to the filter/pump set-up. Have a bypass right after the pump that dumps back into the cell (#8 line), then #8 up to the pressure regulator which then has two #6 lines to the carb. #6 lines will more than feed the needle & seats. My pump/filter is a Magna Fuel and I went by their suggestions.
#78
I hate the Holley red/blue pumps, WAY too noisey. Mallory 140's have worked great for MANY years for me, and much less noise - but for a FREE pump....
My Falcon and my Firebird both had -8 all the way to the regulator, then -6 to the carb. My OLD Falcon motor made 545/545 on Faerman's dyno, and my current motor makes about 70 (on a chassis dyno, never been on an engine dyno) hp more - so I don't think you "need" the -10/-8 combo.
On my Cutlass project, I'm going -8 from the RobbMC pickup to the pump, then will have -6 forward and return lines - and that will also be a 500hp motor.
Also on the Cutlass, I'm using nylon-braided with push-lock fittings. Lighter, easier, a bit cheaper, and supposedly the push-lock hose stands up better to the alcohol in our fuel. I'm NOT changing out the braided stainless on my other cars until I have a problem, though!
Lee
My Falcon and my Firebird both had -8 all the way to the regulator, then -6 to the carb. My OLD Falcon motor made 545/545 on Faerman's dyno, and my current motor makes about 70 (on a chassis dyno, never been on an engine dyno) hp more - so I don't think you "need" the -10/-8 combo.
On my Cutlass project, I'm going -8 from the RobbMC pickup to the pump, then will have -6 forward and return lines - and that will also be a 500hp motor.
Also on the Cutlass, I'm using nylon-braided with push-lock fittings. Lighter, easier, a bit cheaper, and supposedly the push-lock hose stands up better to the alcohol in our fuel. I'm NOT changing out the braided stainless on my other cars until I have a problem, though!
Lee
Woohoo! Nothing like a free Holley Blue 120 gph pump, regulator, and filter to get you motivated! Now all I've got to do is plumb this thing, any tips would be greatly appreciated.
Getting RobbMC 1/2" pickup w/ -10 AN fittings, plan on getting -10 AN braided hose to filter, pump, regulator, then -8 AN braided hose to carb. Good? Bad?
Steve
Getting RobbMC 1/2" pickup w/ -10 AN fittings, plan on getting -10 AN braided hose to filter, pump, regulator, then -8 AN braided hose to carb. Good? Bad?
Steve
#79
Also I suggest installing the filter before the pump (helps save the pump). You can also use 1/2" aluminum hard line from pump to reg. Had that on my car for a few years. #10 is overkill for you (and myself). My motor produced 730 HP and #8 works just fine.
Last edited by 380 Racer; February 12th, 2012 at 07:24 AM.
#80
I was thinking -10 was 1/2" hose...-8 is what I meant. I'll go -8 from tank to filter / pump / regulator, and -6 to carb. I would like to put the regulator right next to the carb and have the -8 to regulator and then 2 -6's to the carb. I've seen a couple of setups but I'm not sure I like them. Do you guys have any pics or suggestions? Thanks!
- Steve
- Steve