425 rods in a 455?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 30th, 2018, 05:06 PM
  #1  
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
 
73aussie455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
425 rods in a 455?

Hi all, I had a pretty decent look for this info but couldn't find any. I'm sure it must be here somewhere and if someone would like to post a link to it, that's all I really ask.

I'll just say I'm not going to do this, curious is all.
I've read the 425 rods are about 1/2"ish longer center to center than 455 rods.
Is it possible to install these on a 455 crank and into a 455 block with available aftermarket pistons? I guess pistons would need to have the pins closer to the top so as not to crash spectacularly into the heads?
Seems like a way to stroke the 455 with available parts if possible.

Again, I have no idea if this is possible, or if the 425 rods have the same big end journal size as the 455 crank or if it isn't a whole lot of work to get them to fit etc.

There would also be other considerations I'm sure, and if it was that easy lots of people would have already done it.

I'm sure someone has thought about this before though, just can't find where.
73aussie455 is offline  
Old January 30th, 2018, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Kennybill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Braceville, Ohio
Posts: 1,972
People have use 455 crankshaft, 425 rods with Pontiac pistons.
Kennybill is offline  
Old January 30th, 2018, 08:07 PM
  #3  
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
 
73aussie455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
Thanks kennybill, that setup in a 455 block?

sounds easy but i'm sure there would be a few mods to do for rod clearance etc.

any idea how many more cubes that gives, i guess 40 odd ci.
73aussie455 is offline  
Old January 30th, 2018, 11:32 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
Gerald Nickels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 1,964
The best reason they put 425 parts in a 455 block is a better cam selection at 39 deg. Some say the 455 parts will not fit in a 425 block. I have never tried it. The 455 block has clearance on the bottom of cylinders for rods. The 425 does not have clearance.
Gerald Nickels is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 12:36 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
android 211's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 321
Longer rods move the torque peak up about 500 rpm. Longer rods reduce cylinder wall loading. Longer rods increase dwell time at TDC and theoretically decrease ping and improve breathing. To do this you must sit down and calculate compression height and deck height of the piston. Consult your machinist.
android 211 is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 04:05 AM
  #6  
Phantom Phixer
 
Charlie Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Apopka, FL
Posts: 4,775
Originally Posted by 73aussie455
Seems like a way to stroke the 455 with available parts if possible.


No, the stroke is determined by the crankshaft ( The distance the rod journal is from the crank centerline) .
Longer rods will change rod angularity , which has some performance advantages . If you can get the right pistons .
Charlie Jones is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 06:36 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,861
Correct advice above. 455 rods are 6.7", 425 rods are 7" center to center. No change in displacement, but other effects are as noted in above posts.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 09:22 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,892
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
Correct advice above. 455 rods are 6.7", 425 rods are 7" center to center. No change in displacement, but other effects are as noted in above posts.
Correct.
And to make the statement that a longer rod “will raise the power peak 500rpm” is unfounded. I did a couple of builds with the longer 7.00 rod and Pontiac style piston. Apples to apples it was about a 200 rpm difference, not 500. Another inaccuracy is that the long rod reduces the chance of detonation, not true. Actually quite the opposite, think about why.
However a longer rod MAY lend itself to smoother running but that’s somewhat of an objective observation.
Finally, the last bit of bad info is that many have said the 425 “ will wind higher”. Again apples to apples, it’s not because of the longer rod. An engine of less displacement will rpm higher as compared to a larger one if they both share the same intake and exhaust flow. It takes more air to feed the larger displacement, hence it’ll run out of steam sooner.

Last edited by cutlassefi; January 31st, 2018 at 12:51 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 10:38 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Kennybill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Braceville, Ohio
Posts: 1,972
Henry "Smokey" Yunick always said to put in the longest rod possible. He felt the piston would dwell at TDC longer and produce a tad more hp. He was always looking for an advantage no matter how small. He was quite successful. Kind of like "watching your pennies and the dollars will take care of themselves."
Kennybill is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 03:39 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,182
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Finally, the last bit of bad info is that many have said the 425 “ will wind higher”. Again apples to apples, it’s not because of the longer rod. An engine of less displacement will rpm higher as compared to a larger one if they both share the same intake and exhaust flow. It takes more air to feed the larger displacement, hence it’ll run out of steam sooner.
But with apples to apples component weights, etc, a shorter stroke engine will rev faster due to the shorter axis of rotation. A good example is how a figure skater spins faster when the arms and legs are pulled in towards the body (conservation of angular momentum).
Fun71 is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 04:39 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,892
There are lots of things that enhance throttle response, rotating weight, compression, intake flow, and so on. Rod length/stroke has little to nothing to do with that.
I've had lots of 455's on the dyno that had excellent throttle response, and a couple of 425's. And I can tell you that different cams, pistons, intakes, carbs and a whole bunch of other stuff effects that. Again rod length is pretty much inconsequential.
P.S. my dyno guy does a lot of mountain motors, 858c.i. BBC. With 15.0:1 compression they rev with the best of them and make 1800hp with no power adders. And they have strokes of over 5.00". Go figure.

Last edited by cutlassefi; January 31st, 2018 at 04:44 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 04:39 PM
  #12  
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
 
73aussie455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
thanks guys and as always Good points above.
I guess I thought this would increase capacity but of course a stroker crank would be needed to get the piston to travel further down at the bottom of the stroke to increase capacity.

Yes I didnt quite have the brain in the right mode thinking about this.
73aussie455 is offline  
Old January 31st, 2018, 04:46 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,892
Originally Posted by Gerald Nickels
The 455 block has clearance on the bottom of cylinders for rods. The 425 does not have clearance.

Yes it does, the cylinders in a 425 block are actually about 3/8" shorter than a 455 block, hence why they don't have notches, don't need them.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 1st, 2018, 06:49 AM
  #14  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,723
Originally Posted by 73aussie455
I guess I thought this would increase capacity but of course a stroker crank would be needed to get the piston to travel further down at the bottom of the stroke to increase capacity.
Rod length has nothing to do with displacement, and a longer stroke requires a SHORTER rod, not a longer one. That's why the 455 has a rod that's 0.3" shorter than the one in the 425.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old March 27th, 2019, 09:37 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Davenalkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 2
Ive done it almost to fire it up soon

Originally Posted by Kennybill
Henry "Smokey" Yunick always said to put in the longest rod possible. He felt the piston would dwell at TDC longer and produce a tad more hp. He was always looking for an advantage no matter how small. He was quite successful. Kind of like "watching your pennies and the dollars will take care of themselves."
Davenalkie is offline  
Old March 28th, 2019, 05:16 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: St. Paul Minnesota
Posts: 4,144
What have you done ?
OLDSter Ralph is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jplee6770
General Questions
13
February 6th, 2018 09:44 AM
KenOlds442
General Questions
2
January 23rd, 2018 12:03 PM
Jaybird
Parts Wanted
11
April 23rd, 2012 04:50 PM
40 Olds
General Discussion
9
March 22nd, 2012 06:31 AM
olds425
Big Blocks
3
May 6th, 2010 07:22 AM



Quick Reply: 425 rods in a 455?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:00 PM.