425 rods in a 455?
#1
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
425 rods in a 455?
Hi all, I had a pretty decent look for this info but couldn't find any. I'm sure it must be here somewhere and if someone would like to post a link to it, that's all I really ask.
I'll just say I'm not going to do this, curious is all.
I've read the 425 rods are about 1/2"ish longer center to center than 455 rods.
Is it possible to install these on a 455 crank and into a 455 block with available aftermarket pistons? I guess pistons would need to have the pins closer to the top so as not to crash spectacularly into the heads?
Seems like a way to stroke the 455 with available parts if possible.
Again, I have no idea if this is possible, or if the 425 rods have the same big end journal size as the 455 crank or if it isn't a whole lot of work to get them to fit etc.
There would also be other considerations I'm sure, and if it was that easy lots of people would have already done it.
I'm sure someone has thought about this before though, just can't find where.
I'll just say I'm not going to do this, curious is all.
I've read the 425 rods are about 1/2"ish longer center to center than 455 rods.
Is it possible to install these on a 455 crank and into a 455 block with available aftermarket pistons? I guess pistons would need to have the pins closer to the top so as not to crash spectacularly into the heads?
Seems like a way to stroke the 455 with available parts if possible.
Again, I have no idea if this is possible, or if the 425 rods have the same big end journal size as the 455 crank or if it isn't a whole lot of work to get them to fit etc.
There would also be other considerations I'm sure, and if it was that easy lots of people would have already done it.
I'm sure someone has thought about this before though, just can't find where.
#3
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
Thanks kennybill, that setup in a 455 block?
sounds easy but i'm sure there would be a few mods to do for rod clearance etc.
any idea how many more cubes that gives, i guess 40 odd ci.
sounds easy but i'm sure there would be a few mods to do for rod clearance etc.
any idea how many more cubes that gives, i guess 40 odd ci.
#4
The best reason they put 425 parts in a 455 block is a better cam selection at 39 deg. Some say the 455 parts will not fit in a 425 block. I have never tried it. The 455 block has clearance on the bottom of cylinders for rods. The 425 does not have clearance.
#5
Longer rods move the torque peak up about 500 rpm. Longer rods reduce cylinder wall loading. Longer rods increase dwell time at TDC and theoretically decrease ping and improve breathing. To do this you must sit down and calculate compression height and deck height of the piston. Consult your machinist.
#6
Longer rods will change rod angularity , which has some performance advantages . If you can get the right pistons .
#8
And to make the statement that a longer rod “will raise the power peak 500rpm” is unfounded. I did a couple of builds with the longer 7.00 rod and Pontiac style piston. Apples to apples it was about a 200 rpm difference, not 500. Another inaccuracy is that the long rod reduces the chance of detonation, not true. Actually quite the opposite, think about why.
However a longer rod MAY lend itself to smoother running but that’s somewhat of an objective observation.
Finally, the last bit of bad info is that many have said the 425 “ will wind higher”. Again apples to apples, it’s not because of the longer rod. An engine of less displacement will rpm higher as compared to a larger one if they both share the same intake and exhaust flow. It takes more air to feed the larger displacement, hence it’ll run out of steam sooner.
Last edited by cutlassefi; January 31st, 2018 at 12:51 PM.
#9
Henry "Smokey" Yunick always said to put in the longest rod possible. He felt the piston would dwell at TDC longer and produce a tad more hp. He was always looking for an advantage no matter how small. He was quite successful. Kind of like "watching your pennies and the dollars will take care of themselves."
#10
Finally, the last bit of bad info is that many have said the 425 “ will wind higher”. Again apples to apples, it’s not because of the longer rod. An engine of less displacement will rpm higher as compared to a larger one if they both share the same intake and exhaust flow. It takes more air to feed the larger displacement, hence it’ll run out of steam sooner.
#11
There are lots of things that enhance throttle response, rotating weight, compression, intake flow, and so on. Rod length/stroke has little to nothing to do with that.
I've had lots of 455's on the dyno that had excellent throttle response, and a couple of 425's. And I can tell you that different cams, pistons, intakes, carbs and a whole bunch of other stuff effects that. Again rod length is pretty much inconsequential.
P.S. my dyno guy does a lot of mountain motors, 858c.i. BBC. With 15.0:1 compression they rev with the best of them and make 1800hp with no power adders. And they have strokes of over 5.00". Go figure.
I've had lots of 455's on the dyno that had excellent throttle response, and a couple of 425's. And I can tell you that different cams, pistons, intakes, carbs and a whole bunch of other stuff effects that. Again rod length is pretty much inconsequential.
P.S. my dyno guy does a lot of mountain motors, 858c.i. BBC. With 15.0:1 compression they rev with the best of them and make 1800hp with no power adders. And they have strokes of over 5.00". Go figure.
Last edited by cutlassefi; January 31st, 2018 at 04:44 PM.
#12
Acceleratii maxim rapidus
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Great Southern Taxland...
Posts: 369
thanks guys and as always Good points above.
I guess I thought this would increase capacity but of course a stroker crank would be needed to get the piston to travel further down at the bottom of the stroke to increase capacity.
Yes I didnt quite have the brain in the right mode thinking about this.
I guess I thought this would increase capacity but of course a stroker crank would be needed to get the piston to travel further down at the bottom of the stroke to increase capacity.
Yes I didnt quite have the brain in the right mode thinking about this.
#13
#14
Rod length has nothing to do with displacement, and a longer stroke requires a SHORTER rod, not a longer one. That's why the 455 has a rod that's 0.3" shorter than the one in the 425.
#15
Ive done it almost to fire it up soon
Henry "Smokey" Yunick always said to put in the longest rod possible. He felt the piston would dwell at TDC longer and produce a tad more hp. He was always looking for an advantage no matter how small. He was quite successful. Kind of like "watching your pennies and the dollars will take care of themselves."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KenOlds442
General Questions
2
January 23rd, 2018 12:03 PM