Name shame (?)...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
auto_editor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got wood? I do! (an '89)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 310
From: Southeast Michigan
Name shame (?)...

Every now and then I get hooked on an idea for a feature/article that I can't let go but can't really "research" either.

But (hopefully) I can get the latest one figgered out with your assistance (as you're the most qualified group I know):

Why was the Aurora seemingly allergic to Oldsmobile badging?

Not only was there no "Oldsmobile", but they even deleted their then-new "speared-oval". In fact, they even went to far as to create a "wiggly A" logo for the engine cover!

Wikipedia says "As a symbol of its clean break from other cars in the lineup, the Aurora bore no Oldsmobile badging or script save for the radio/CD/cassette deck and engine cover."

[Wikipedia dropped the ball on that last one, BTW. Their own photo of the 4.0-liter engine clearly shows the A and NOT an Olds logo. ]



How did they expect to sell these cars? If you saw one, and really liked it, you'd have no idea who made it (and therefore to which dealership you should go to get your own).

I just can't get my head around it. So, here's your chance to be a real, live "expert source" for a real, live journalist (for whatever that's worth).

I'm counting on you... don't fail me now!
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 06:13 PM
  #2  
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
"me somebody" site member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Same deal with my 1998 Intrigue...only said "Oldsmobile" on the radio.
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 06:32 PM
  #3  
QMaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 486
From: Bloomfield, MI
They left the Oldsmobile name and symbol off because the brand management marketing geniuses hired from Proctor & Gamble, and most of the business media insisted that Oldsmobile's problem was that people associated the name Oldsmobile with old people. That is also why the cars had no name ties to Olds history. The marketing folks could not get their heads around the need for good product, mostly because their big egos had them believing that they could sell anything with effective marketing. Turns out that they were wrong.
They should have called the Aurora "Toronado" or "98", and offered it with "W" coded options packages, at the same time resurrecting Olds' history and performance heritage. They probably would have sold more cars and Olds might still be around. The Intrigue should have been the "Cutlass".
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 06:46 PM
  #4  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
I've had the impression that the P&G folks and the "Oldsmobile is for old people" thing were two different things from two different eras (so to speak) of GM. :twocents:

Oldsmobile was trying to shed their stale image, and calling the Aurora "Toronado" would have been a mistake in my opinion.
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 08:41 PM
  #5  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Aurora Document

This was probably sent to everyone interested in buying the Aurora in '98 Anywho it's interesting to me and signed by Darwin Clark Oldsmobile's GM at the time
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
Aurora Doc.jpg (42.8 KB, 91 views)
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 09:23 PM
  #6  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,472
From: Muskegon, Mi.
The downside to that, is if yoy saw one on the road, and liked it, how would you know where to buy one? I have been into AutoWeek and other car mags for decades, so I would have read about it, and known about it, but how would the average consumer know? I always thought that it was dumb, if not insulting to leave the name off of the car.
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 10:49 PM
  #7  
72 cutlass455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 682
From: Colton Ca
When I was a young kid I thought Oldsmobile's were for African Americans all I seen was the ads from the coach and how well they built them a the luxury of the cars.
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 12:37 AM
  #8  
lazy394's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 413
From: Adelaide south Australia
seems about the same time Toyota did Lexus and Mazda did Eunos etc.
Toyota was the only one that pulled it off.

My 2 bobs worth
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 04:30 AM
  #9  
QMaster's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 486
From: Bloomfield, MI
Thinking about it, I believe that Diego is correct. I think that the P&G brand management debacle came after Olds tried to shed it's stale image. But I do not believe that forgetting all of your heritage and history, and not branding your product without your brand is an effective way to ressurect the brand. i believe that this was a mistake. The Oldsmobile they wanted to forget was the Olds of the late 80's /early 90's if I remember correctly. Back when they insisted on slapping the Cutlass name on everything, and the Toronado was downsized to ridiculous proportions.
Without a doubt, they damaged the brand and model names with some poor product and marketing. Whether or not Toronado and Cutlass as models could be saved is debatable, but not having the Olds name on the Aurora was not an effective way to resurect the brand. All water under the bridge now...
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 05:37 AM
  #10  
slantflat's Avatar
Always room for one more
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 8,952
From: Georgia
I saw an Aurora pre-production car at the Chicago Auto Show, oh whenever it was first introduced to the public. Kind of a dark cinnamin brown if I recall, and if you looked closely between the tail lights, you could see the Rocket symbol under a coat of gloss black paint.
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 07:50 AM
  #11  
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 11,798
From: Plano, TX
In small relation to this, my Caddy has NO Cadillac name badge anywhere outside. Just a logo on the front and back (which is obsure). I have had several people ask me what it was.
I get the feel that GM thought that their high level cars should be recognised by only appearance and a logo. Whatever...
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 09:00 AM
  #12  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Lady72nRob71
I get the feel that GM thought that their high level cars should be recognised by only appearance and a logo.
Well Mercedes has nothing but "Daimler-Benz" on the "Check-Mark" sticker in the corner of the windshield, Volkswagen doesn't say it anywhere that I know of, and BMW only says "BMW" within the logo.

I think they're trying to look German.
Trouble is, that just points up exactly how German they aren't.

Kinda like white kids walking down the street in baggy pants with neck chains and their baseball caps on sideways

- Eric
Old Sep 22, 2012 | 09:54 AM
  #13  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
If you read the small print under the Aurora name it says "Made Exclusively For Oldsmobile By General Motors"
Old Oct 7, 2012 | 11:49 AM
  #14  
auto_editor's Avatar
Thread Starter
Got wood? I do! (an '89)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 310
From: Southeast Michigan
A little more fuel for the fire...

The Aurora stepped onto the world stage as the Indy 500 pace car for 1997 with no Olds badging in sight...





But then in 2001 they stopped treating it like a bastard stepchild and the Olds name and logo were emblazoned across the whole hood!





What changed? Why did Olds decide to boldly label the pace car and yet continue to NOT label the ones they were selling to the public?

[And how ironic is the 1997 image of the badgeless car posed in front of iconic Olds pacers of yore? Was that an attempt at adding "Oldsmobile-ness" subconsciously?]

What a waste. Being the provider of pace cars is VERY expensive, with costs that make Superbowl commercial prices look like pocket change. I can see using brand "minimalism" on an iconic vehicle like the Corvette, but NOT mass-marked car like these.

So what number coffin nails were these?...
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 05:27 AM
  #15  
Randy T.'s Avatar
Aurora Olds Mo.
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
From: Springfield, Missouri
Originally Posted by TripDeuces
If you read the small print under the Aurora name it says "Made Exclusively For Oldsmobile By General Motors"
That is referring to the engine, not the car.
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 05:40 AM
  #16  
Randy T.'s Avatar
Aurora Olds Mo.
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6
From: Springfield, Missouri
Original poster. It's a simple explanation, the car is not an Oldsmobile Aurora, it is an Aurora by Oldsmobile. It does say Oldsmobile on the radio.

I can also tell you at the 100 year Oldsmobile mark, the early '97 Auroras have a little Oldsmobile emblem below the Aurora name on the rear panel. I have one of these panels.

five711.jpg
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 06:57 AM
  #17  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Diego
I've had the impression that the P&G folks and the "Oldsmobile is for old people" thing were two different things from two different eras (so to speak) of GM. :twocents:

Oldsmobile was trying to shed their stale image, and calling the Aurora "Toronado" would have been a mistake in my opinion.
Originally Posted by QMaster
Thinking about it, I believe that Diego is correct. I think that the P&G brand management debacle came after Olds tried to shed it's stale image. But I do not believe that forgetting all of your heritage and history, and not branding your product without your brand is an effective way to ressurect the brand. i believe that this was a mistake. The Oldsmobile they wanted to forget was the Olds of the late 80's /early 90's if I remember correctly. Back when they insisted on slapping the Cutlass name on everything, and the Toronado was downsized to ridiculous proportions.
Without a doubt, they damaged the brand and model names with some poor product and marketing. Whether or not Toronado and Cutlass as models could be saved is debatable, but not having the Olds name on the Aurora was not an effective way to resurect the brand. All water under the bridge now...
John is essentially correct. This was also the era the *all* of the automakers were afraid to look different so the cars, logos, etc. all looked alike for the most part. But Oldsmobile suffered from horrendous marketing that resulted from GM's ineptness (and ultimate plan to phase out Olds) and the injection of divisional marketing that was generic consumer marketing that had no idea of the automobile market. John Rock was the last semblance of any true leadership that Olds had, and he found out he was pretty much emasculated by GM. Shedding their image has been one of the biggest mistakes that GM has and continues to make.
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 03:20 PM
  #18  
Rocketowner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,393
From: Tennessee
I am and always have been a huge Oldsmobile fan but they made several terrible decisions ,such as putting Chevrolet engines in Delta and other Oldsmobiles without knowledge to loyal customers, that placed confidence in Oldsmobile for building a superior product,and not informing the public at all before making this move!That could be compared to buying a Lincoln and finding out later that it had a Pinto engine. Huge mistake! (Name Shame) Larry
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 05:29 PM
  #19  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Oldsmobile was trying to shed their stale image
============

Good idea, look how that killed Mopar when they brought back that stupid "Hemi" name. Outmoded stale outdated crap. Oh, wait, they sold millions of them.

God forbid they educate people on the Olds name, history, etc. Recall and introduce to newcomers the concept of a 442 and what that meas.... back when it meant something.

But, I am not an educated brand manager.

Hemi.

Still milking that cow.
Old Sep 24, 2014 | 05:48 PM
  #20  
popeye1978's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 28
The most-successful companies are not necessarily the best run, just the least-poorly run

I wonder if any instructors of business leadership and/or marketing ever use the story of Oldsmobile as a case study

- Denys
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldstata
General Discussion
401
Feb 23, 2022 03:24 PM
HonestDave
General Discussion
20
Oct 7, 2013 06:45 AM
ROCKET VAPOR
Parts For Sale
7
Jun 26, 2012 01:28 PM
a64olz
General Discussion
3
May 30, 2010 07:03 PM
BlueBlock350
Small Blocks
7
May 22, 2008 01:51 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 AM.