T50 bell housing confirmation needed please.

Old Sep 23, 2020 | 04:11 PM
  #1  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
T50 bell housing confirmation needed please.

I found this post by Oldsmobile Joe on gbodyforum.com and was hoping someone can confirm his information for me.

"olds bell housing are all the same, they are a BOP housing with a dual transmission bolt pattern. the first pattern is for traditional muncie/saginaw/t5. the second pattern is for the ford HD 3speed trans that was offered back in the 60's. both of my t50 equipped cutlasses have this bell housing."

I am trying to make a transmission selection for a 260-455 swap. Five speed OD was the first choice but I really do not want to cut the floor and I am still not sure if it would be an issue in the 73-77 cars. Maybe an M-20 to go with the current 2.73 rear end? This will be a stock 455 cruiser.

Thanks in advance

Last edited by JPinAZ; Sep 23, 2020 at 04:37 PM.
Old Sep 23, 2020 | 04:27 PM
  #2  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
Originally Posted by JPinAZ
I found this post by Oldsmobile Joe on gbodyforum.com and was hoping someone can confirm his information for me.

"olds bell housing are all the same, they are a BOP housing with a dual transmission bolt pattern. the first pattern is for traditional muncie/saginaw/t5. the second pattern is for the ford HD 3speed trans that was offered back in the 60's. both of my t50 equipped cutlasses have this bell housing."

I am trying to make a transmission selection. Five speed OD was the first choice but I really do not want to cut the floor and I am still not sure if it would be an issue in the 73-77 cars. Maybe an M-20 to go with the current 2.73 rear end? This will be a stock 455 cruiser.

Thanks in advance

many bell housings have the dual pattern for muncie or ford, not all have it
Old Sep 23, 2020 | 04:38 PM
  #3  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by RetroRanger
many bell housings have the dual pattern for muncie or ford, not all have it
Do you know it the T50 and Muncies are the same? Hoping to reuse the original for now.
Old Sep 23, 2020 | 06:42 PM
  #4  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
Originally Posted by JPinAZ
Do you know it the T50 and Muncies are the same? Hoping to reuse the original for now.
it lookslike its the same as the muncie

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ission-110340/

heres a pic i took off the internet of a dual pattern BH ford pattern in blue muncie in orange. I think if you look at your bell in the car you should be able to tellif it has the ford pattern on it



Old Sep 24, 2020 | 03:05 PM
  #5  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Thank you
Old Sep 24, 2020 | 05:13 PM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,857
From: Northern VA
The T50 and even the original GM T5s all use the Muncie bolt pattern to the bell. What I don't know is if the diameter of the pilot on the bearing retainer that really locates the trans in the bell is the same. That's really more important than the bolt pattern - you can always drill more holes. It's the bearing retainer that locates it.
Old Sep 24, 2020 | 08:00 PM
  #7  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The T50 and even the original GM T5s all use the Muncie bolt pattern to the bell. What I don't know is if the diameter of the pilot on the bearing retainer that really locates the trans in the bell is the same. That's really more important than the bolt pattern - you can always drill more holes. It's the bearing retainer that locates it.
You are talking the pilot bearing in the crank, correct? Not the throw out or fork pivot.
Old Sep 25, 2020 | 05:12 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,857
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by JPinAZ
You are talking the pilot bearing in the crank, correct? Not the throw out or fork pivot.
Neither. I'm talking about the input shaft bearing retainer on the front on the trans that fits into the large hole in the bellhousing. THAT'S what locates concentricity of the trans to the engine.
Old Sep 25, 2020 | 07:19 AM
  #9  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Got it

Old Sep 27, 2020 | 12:33 PM
  #10  
Funkwagon455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,847
From: Aledo, Texas
Aside from the obvious engine to trans alignment concerns, the g-body bells have an oddly shaped throw out bearing fork which positions the pivot ball lower in the bell housing. When I converted my ‘82 Regal in ‘99, I used a steel Lakewood scattershield and had to fill, drill and machine the necessary holes to accommodate everything. The TKO five speed held up just fine with a GN 8.5” ring and is almost certainly the most impressive upgrade I had ever done to the car. I’m sure that I would have been lucky to have gotten half as much when I sold it, had it still been a TH350.
Old Sep 27, 2020 | 01:20 PM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,857
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Funkwagon455
Aside from the obvious engine to trans alignment concerns, the g-body bells have an oddly shaped throw out bearing fork which positions the pivot ball lower in the bell housing.
The OP has a 1977 A-body with the factory 260/T50 combo. It's the normal A-body bell.
Old Sep 27, 2020 | 02:11 PM
  #12  
Funkwagon455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,847
From: Aledo, Texas
Whoops, I clearly missed that!🙄
Old Feb 28, 2026 | 11:09 AM
  #13  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Neither. I'm talking about the input shaft bearing retainer on the front on the trans that fits into the large hole in the bellhousing. THAT'S what locates concentricity of the trans to the engine.
Moving forward on the tremec install. I have been talking to joe at https://dederichsmotorsports.com/ and he believes there are two different bell housings used with the T50. One was used for the 4/6 cylinder engines and one for the V8. He believes the V8 bell housing has the correct opening and will work with the TKX. We will find out soon.
Old Feb 28, 2026 | 11:38 AM
  #14  
Funkwagon455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,847
From: Aledo, Texas
It will work just fine. You might need to create a relief or opening to accommodate the shifter housing on the TKX. Otherwise it’s pretty much a straight shot. You are going to LOVE this investment!!👍
Old Feb 28, 2026 | 12:30 PM
  #15  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by Funkwagon455
It will work just fine. You might need to create a relief or opening to accommodate the shifter housing on the TKX. Otherwise it’s pretty much a straight shot. You are going to LOVE this investment!!👍
That is good news. Being that the car is a 442 it has bucket seats and no console so hopefully it will be easy if needed. When I did have the transmission out of this car the hole for the shifter looked like someone cut it
with a jig saw on the line.


Old Feb 28, 2026 | 04:33 PM
  #16  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by Funkwagon455
It will work just fine. You might need to create a relief or opening to accommodate the shifter housing on the TKX. Otherwise it’s pretty much a straight shot. You are going to LOVE this investment!!👍
Hoping to use the OE bell housing and Z bar set up. I think it might be a fairly easy swap. The only concerns are crossmember, shifter/location and driveshaft.
Old Feb 28, 2026 | 04:58 PM
  #17  
Funkwagon455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,847
From: Aledo, Texas
Crossmember will likely be shifted one hole forward on the frame.. The driveshaft replacement is a given both for additional length as well as marrying a 31 spline Ford inspired yoke to your GM drivetrain.. Not difficult, not overly expensive considering the price point of the gearbox.. I used a standard 1350 joint on the front and the factory 3RL joint on the rear on a 3” tube. No special adapters, 3/4 ton truck grade. Super dumb,,…. Super FUN!!🤩

Last edited by Funkwagon455; Feb 28, 2026 at 05:03 PM.
Old Feb 28, 2026 | 05:04 PM
  #18  
JPinAZ's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 161
Originally Posted by Funkwagon455
Crossmember will likely be shifted one hole forward on the frame.. The driveshaft replacement is a given both for additional length as well as marrying a 31 spline Ford inspired yoke to your GM drivetrain.. Not difficult, not overly expensive considering the price point of the gearbox..
Driveshaft is a no brainer. It should go smooth but I am hoping I am not jinxing myself.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rpinnt
Parts Wanted
0
Feb 16, 2016 06:41 PM
Nilsson
Transmission and Driveline
5
Jan 23, 2015 10:02 PM
oldspower_68
Big Blocks
0
Mar 23, 2012 02:18 PM
ozoneblue
General Discussion
0
Jan 23, 2011 05:42 PM
ozoneblue
Parts Wanted
0
Aug 21, 2007 05:59 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 PM.