TH 400 Tag questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 15, 2025 | 06:54 PM
  #1  
67VistaBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 127
From: New Milford,PA
TH 400 Tag questions

I've been searching previous TH 400 related posts trying to find info on my latest quest for Olds knowledge.
On my VC, the ID tag reads: OA-67 3596, it's mated to a 4Bbl 330. I believe they're original to the '67 VC but haven't figured out what the 'series' is listed in the CSM.
             OA-67  3596
OA-67 3596

There are 3 sets of numbers listed; 3465, 3855, 3865. What does that pertain to?

My other question pertains to getting a new OA stencil / decal to go on the plate.
Does anyone reproduce them?

Last edited by 67VistaBlue; Dec 15, 2025 at 06:59 PM.
Old Dec 16, 2025 | 02:21 AM
  #2  
HydraMatic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 147
From: Northern New England
The numbers 3465, 3855, 3865 are body style broadcast codes.

Here is a photograph of page 2 from the 1967 Oldsmobile Inspector’s Guide that summarizes the body codes.

Broadcast code 3465 is a F-85 standard V-8 Station Wagon, 3 seat extended.

Broadcast code 3855 is a F-85 Custom Wagon, 2 seat extended.

Broadcast code 3865 is a F-85 Custom Wagon, 3 seat extended.

Extended refers to the Vista Cruiser.

This information is also available on the first few pages of the 1967 Chassis Service Manual.

When you have the opportunity post some more photos of your Oldsmobile for us . . .


1967 oldsmobile inspectors guide


body style codes
Old Dec 16, 2025 | 03:41 AM
  #3  
Hairy Olds's Avatar
Shoveling Snow
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,729
From: Yoder-Hey-Land
I do not make a decal for your trans and I don't know of anyone that does.


Old Dec 16, 2025 | 05:19 AM
  #4  
67VistaBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 127
From: New Milford,PA
Thank you for the info. The car is apart for winter improvements / maintenance.
I'm having almost as much enjoyment working on it as compared to driving it (mental therapy).
Almost done replacing leaking seals / gaskets and tail shaft bushing



Last edited by 67VistaBlue; Dec 16, 2025 at 05:52 AM.
Old Dec 16, 2025 | 05:29 AM
  #5  
67VistaBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 127
From: New Milford,PA
Hopefully I'll find a source for the stencil / decal. That's a nice cosmetic detail.
Old Dec 17, 2025 | 09:00 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
That trans is not a TH400. It is a TH375, which is the low-strength version of the TH400. It uses reduced clutch counts and the smaller Jetaway-sized output shaft. The TH375 was only built in the long tail version and was used behind small blocks in heavy, long wheelbase cars like the VC and the Delmont 88. Look at the bottom of the tailhousing. It will say 375 THM.



Old Dec 17, 2025 | 09:11 AM
  #7  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,698
Joe, was Jetaway not available in wagons?
Old Dec 17, 2025 | 09:27 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
The shorter wheelbase flattop wagons used the Jetaway until the TH350 was released in mid-1969. The long-wheelbase Vista was heavier. It used a long-tail HD Jetaway in 1964-66. The TH375 was used starting in 1967 for small block Vistas.
Old Dec 18, 2025 | 07:21 AM
  #9  
67VistaBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 127
From: New Milford,PA
Joe,
I looked under the tailshaft housing, no indication of a TH 375 (see photos). I did see a date code (66).
When I ordered a tailshaft bushing and seal for a TH 400 and it was identical to the old ones.
You know a lot more than me, I just ***-umed it was a 400 and got lucky with the parts?



work in progress

Old Dec 18, 2025 | 10:19 AM
  #10  
Vintage Chief's Avatar
Running On Empty
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 25,951
From: Earth
The tail shaft demonstrates what appears to be 8623734. I suppose the only way to be definitive is to validate the spline count? TH375 typically was 27 spine while TH400 typically was 32 spline, I believe? Post #3 from Hairy Olds doesn't show that tail shaft #, although many discussions in several forums demonstrate 8623734 as having belonged to a TH400. Not an area I have much knowledge.





Old Dec 18, 2025 | 02:07 PM
  #11  
67VistaBlue's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2024
Posts: 127
From: New Milford,PA
It's 32 splines. So at this point I'm guessing it's a 400.
For my application a 375 would have been just fine, as long as it works and nothing leaks.
Thanks again for everyone's input.
Ed
Old Dec 20, 2025 | 10:47 AM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 67VistaBlue
It's 32 splines. So at this point I'm guessing it's a 400.
For my application a 375 would have been just fine, as long as it works and nothing leaks.
Thanks again for everyone's input.
Ed
If the TH400 output bushing and seal fit, it is a TH400. The TH375 uses the smaller TH350-sized bushing and seal. I wonder if it's an original trans or not. Unfortunately, 8623734 is the casting number for the tail housing. That won't show up in the parts book or PIM. The part number will be different because it would be the assembly that included the bushing and seal.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
srq442
Cars For Sale
13
Sep 6, 2023 07:21 PM
yellowrocket
Transmission
1
Jul 15, 2019 02:18 AM
rand5204
Transmission
4
Mar 10, 2019 02:24 PM
barnfind
Vintage Oldsmobiles
11
Jun 17, 2017 06:20 AM
Hairy Olds
Parts For Sale
0
Jan 9, 2009 06:32 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:30 AM.