stock 200r4 too weak? 8.5-1 350 stock cam 3.42 gear

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 01:33 PM
  #1  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
Arrow stock 200r4 too weak? 8.5-1 350 stock cam 3.42 gear

As the title suggests, all know a 200r4 is weak in stock form, but my combo is pretty tame. I don't have the money to swap in a manual so its pretty much the only path to OD glory.

I plan on keeping the stock cam, and want to cruise and road trip more than put slicks on and race. With an estimated 225 hp and mid 8:1 compression, would a stock unit in good working condition hold up for a while?

I dont care if it barks tires, and the motor will never be making 550 hp so a built unit seems unneeded. Hell, I'll probably never be making 275.

I have a LSD, and run slightly wide radials in back, on 3.42 gears so between the low torque motor, and high gearing, I'm thinking I might get by! Thoughts?
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 01:39 PM
  #2  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
note: searched my guts out, no one is asking about motors that make d*ck squat for hp...

also which models to seek out as being decent in stock form and usable in this application would be appreciated, that should really be on a sticky or tech page.

I have the th400 crossmember and am ready to shop.
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 05:36 PM
  #3  
cdrod's Avatar
Rodney
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,578
From: Houston, TX
Best 200-4r units

The best units are from the Buick GN, MonteCarlo SS, and Hurst Olds. These are identified by the trans tag and will have the a 2-3 letter designation:
Buick GN - BRF or BQ
Monte SS - CZF
Hurst Olds - KZF or OZ
One of these may live for a while in a low HP situation, but probably not for long if you drive it hard.
Attached Images
File Type: gif
200r4TransTag.gif (33.2 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg
88CRF1052-800x600.jpg (519.8 KB, 47 views)
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 06:55 PM
  #4  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
All 2004R trans from model year 84 and up are identical internally except for calibration. Calibration changes include valve body, servo, and governor. If you have a non-performance trans in good condition the best way to hop one up is to contact CK Performance and get his valve body package. It includes the valve body, servo and governor. He has several options depending on desired shift points.

If the TV cable is adjusted correctly, and the trans is in good condition with the correct calibration it will reliably handle 300hp. It will PROBABLY handle more, but the forward clutch housing becomes a unknown weak link. They are unpredictable when it will break.

I have covered this topic a couple times, do a search and some reading. These are good transmissions when set up right.
Old Dec 22, 2013 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
ThePackRat's Avatar
Big Daddy No Bucks
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 893
From: SW Florida
A lot 200R4's didn't even survive behind 307's.

Something to consider if you were thinking of just tossing it behind the 350 w/o beefing it up any.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 01:23 AM
  #6  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
rat vs matt: pick a side!!

one reasons my 225 hp is within reasonable use of a stock transmission

one reasons even a boat anchor can frag em.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 07:15 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by ThePackRat
A lot 200R4's didn't even survive behind 307's.

Something to consider if you were thinking of just tossing it behind the 350 w/o beefing it up any.
I've busted two behind stock pavement-ripping 140 HP VIN Y motors...
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 08:38 AM
  #8  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
With a 3.42 why not just go th350. Run a short 26. In tall drag radial at the track and a taller tire on the street like say a 275 60 15 to keep rpms down . I would not go th400 as you are trying to hit a certain et. Everyone say's a th400 will eat 25 hp. I'm testin tha theory next year. Baselining with a th400 then trying the th350 I built and see how much I speed up et. Wise.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 10:09 AM
  #9  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
I've busted two behind stock pavement-ripping 140 HP VIN Y motors...

And I have put them behind mild 455 and 403 engines. These were stock fresh from the salvage yard. Is it ideal? Probably not. But the point is, if they are set up correctly (the TV cable HAS to be right, no "close enough") and is in good condition there is no reason it wont live a happy life behind a mild 350.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 11:00 AM
  #10  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
its th350 now and i wouldnt road trip it on a bet with my 3.42's, pops 66 was a dog after he swapped in a 400 for a jetaway, the th350 he has now is way more responsive behind his hot 330

first time he ever admitted i was right (about a car thing)
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 11:04 AM
  #11  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
th350 would eat less power than an od though huh. ...just a thought but those "ideal" units seem to be out of some pretty exclusive vehicles. dont see many in junkyards. consensus would be if i just got one out of grammas caddy a basic freshening and some mods wouid be advisable even at this hp.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Get the big Trans Go reprogramming kit. It comes with a better servo and line boost valves. I used the green spring for the tv valve and gained 800 rpm full throttle shifting, before 4000 rpm, now 4800. I also changed the stator and upgraded to a 13 vane pump, some claim the 10 vane is the best. A spacer or deep pan and 700R4or 4L60E filter also helps. I have had them last behind a mild 403 and 350 with stock internals. Only reason the original 2004R went was a crappy aftermarket converter imploded.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 12:54 PM
  #13  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
4800 sounds perfect for a stock cam like mine.

how much approximately is labor to have a unit prepped professionally with this kit? honestly the th350 will be fine for a while. I have a crown vic for the interstate and i like taking back roads anyway! 3.42's do fine at 45 or 50... just not 75

Freshening a cheap one into a high end stock or slightly higher than stock spec sounds like a doable thing, and a much better idea than seeking out a rare/sought after stock unit to use as is. I'll google the kit.
Old Dec 23, 2013 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
By the time you are on your second transmission you could have built a solid one the first time. Think about it. Then you can hammer it all you want
Old Dec 24, 2013 | 11:21 AM
  #15  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
yeah. totally bro.

im not gonna build it SOLID, but some well meaning upgrades and a freshening should be ok. If i planned to add significantly more HP, had BB swap aspirations, or wanted to run slicks i'd definitely be thinking about a more substantial build.

honestly, when it comes to automatics, im not a hammer on it kinda guy though. Aside from when im trying to run someone, i usually drive like ol granny in her caddy probably did. Just tearing around town isnt really my thing and im generally pretty soft on hard parts

I'll probably put the most money into a good converter.
Old Dec 24, 2013 | 11:25 AM
  #16  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
and that kit at 135$ seems like a deal.

Can this be installed in my garage or should a pro be retained to freshen up the unit and install the kit's contents? My transmission guy passed on about 6 months after he built my camaro a nitrous minded 700r4... never did get it to him for tv cable adjustment

...chirping the tires DOES kinda have some appeal. Anyone else use this kit? What can I expect?
Old Dec 24, 2013 | 11:41 AM
  #17  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Nice firm shifts. I have chirped second on occasion, warm pavement and tires. I skipped the dual feeding direct part, it is an optional step. There can be breakage on a stock internal 2004R and I use slicks. If you are getting it overhauled, a competent shop can do it. That is what they say in the instructions, professionals only, not hard with good skills.

Last edited by olds 307 and 403; Dec 24, 2013 at 11:51 AM.
Old Dec 24, 2013 | 01:11 PM
  #18  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
If you decide to go with the 2004R, install a stator support tube in the pump. The factory ones weren't hardened, the aftermarkets are. Since the pump will be out for that, install a 10 vane rotor and hardened rings. The are factory 87 and up 700R4 pumps are 10 vane with hardened rings, my trans supplier sells them for $25 and will interchange with the 2004R.

I haven't used the trans-go kit with the servo yet, from what I have seen and read people seem to like them. The dual feed isn't recommended unless a hardened forward housing is used, the shaft will snap on the 2-3 shift.
Old Dec 24, 2013 | 11:51 PM
  #19  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
THAT is sounding like a transmission guys job. merry christmas everyone!

what is dual feed pray tell?
Old Dec 25, 2013 | 07:40 PM
  #20  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
Once the pump is removed its pretty easy to swap stator support tube. There is some technical steps needed to install the hardened rings and pump rotor, but if you can read a book its also pretty easy. If its more than you want to tackle I cant imagine a trans shop charging much to do the work.

As for the dual feed modification, for some reason Hydro-Matic decided it would be worthwhile to split the direct clutch into 2 separate chambers. One chamber (smaller of the 2) is applied in high gear, and the larger for reverse. The dual feed mod allows both chambers to be used in both high gear and reverse. This allows maximum clutch pack capacity and shift firmness, due to the added apply area of the piston. The TH400, TH350, 4L80E and the 2004R all do this, most high end shift kits do away with the separate piston chambers. Its pretty easy to do the mods internally during a overhaul. It seems to me that its a big added expense that doesn't serve much purpose.
Old Dec 25, 2013 | 08:05 PM
  #21  
odddoylerules's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 174
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
With a 3.42 why not just go th350. Run a short 26. In tall drag radial at the track and a taller tire on the street like say a 275 60 15 to keep rpms down . I would not go th400 as you are trying to hit a certain et. Everyone say's a th400 will eat 25 hp. I'm testin tha theory next year. Baselining with a th400 then trying the th350 I built and see how much I speed up et. Wise.

Cant wait to see how that works out! the 330 revs faster now, but my dad isnt ET inclined...
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 10:04 AM
  #22  
TexasT's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 158
From: Texas
In addition to the hard pump rings, get a stiff sonnax spring to put in the slide. Also get the hard Sun shell. If you plan on any type of snappy 1-2 a good carbon band is a must. Along with a bigger servo setup.
Assembly can make or break it so if tour guy can't follow the specs in the book you might want to do it yourself. Too tight it burns up, too loose it doesn't go far with out incurring wear due to loose clearance .
Old Jan 20, 2014 | 04:47 PM
  #23  
68conv455's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
I would try to find a good BRF or BQ as listed above. Make sure you get the TC with it. Don't expect it to be inexpensive.
If you pay junk $, it will likely be junk.
Old Jan 21, 2014 | 09:03 PM
  #24  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
I went hardened rings, stiffer pump spring, and 13 vane pump because I had it in a basically new 4L60E pump. These trans can be tricky to build and get the shifts where you want it.
Old Jan 22, 2014 | 06:35 AM
  #25  
Professur's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,815
From: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
If you check the online service manuals, they show how to break down and rebuilt all the common trannies. Contrary to common belief, it's not rocket science ... there's no pixie dust at work in there. Tearing one down really only takes basic tools that most gearheads already have. A little time with some 1/4" stock and a grinder and drill can fab up the $300 specialty tools in an hour. A bit of stiff wire bent in two and crimped into the end of a bit of old 1/4" copper plumbing tube all from the scrap bin does the job as a lip seal tool and costs nothing. There's plenty of information online already concerning upgrades.

Hardened parts and taking pistons into the local machine shop to be cut thinner to allow space for an additional plate are all it takes to 'toughen one up' ... of course finding the 'improved' valve bodies doesn't hurt either. These are all available and while a pro shop can make a 4r happy behind 500hp ... they're not doing anything you can't do yourself. They've just made all the mistakes already and learned from them. Things like getting that TV cable perfect.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
delta254
Transmission
27
Jun 3, 2020 03:52 PM
stocki26
Ninety-Eight
15
Apr 16, 2013 01:12 PM
drjr56
General Questions
1
Sep 9, 2012 08:05 PM
gearheads78
General Discussion
72
Jul 2, 2011 08:12 PM
jpaulwhite
Small Blocks
16
Apr 27, 2011 02:58 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:28 PM.