4-speed Transmission Question
#1
4-speed Transmission Question
Is there a 4-speed manual transmission made for olds that can live behind a 455 producing 600 lbs. of torque, or is the TKO 600 the only option?
I have a 69 olds cutlass project car that I'm building which was originally a 350 olds powered motor and a 4-speed manual transmission. The original engine and transmission are both gone. I thought about putting a stoutly built 200-4r behind the 455, but I wanted the fun factor of shifting gears manually. My motor is at the machine shop ready to be rebuilt. However, they cannot balance my rotating assembly until I decide on a manual or automatic transmission to either balance a flywheel or flexplate and install the pilot bearing in the crankshaft.
Also, the car currently has 3.08 gears in it which is fine for me since this will be mostly a street car. Any advice or input provided would be much appreciated.
I have a 69 olds cutlass project car that I'm building which was originally a 350 olds powered motor and a 4-speed manual transmission. The original engine and transmission are both gone. I thought about putting a stoutly built 200-4r behind the 455, but I wanted the fun factor of shifting gears manually. My motor is at the machine shop ready to be rebuilt. However, they cannot balance my rotating assembly until I decide on a manual or automatic transmission to either balance a flywheel or flexplate and install the pilot bearing in the crankshaft.
Also, the car currently has 3.08 gears in it which is fine for me since this will be mostly a street car. Any advice or input provided would be much appreciated.
#2
I have the TKO. Used to have a Muncie M-20. I really like the TKO. Close ratio with an overdrive. I can take the car anywhere. IMO the 200 will have to be beefed to live behind that motor. I think the cost will be about the same except for the fact with the manual you already have the parts. You would have to buy additional parts if you went auto. I think this is a slam dunk in favor of the TKO.
#3
Hey I saw your your YouTube video of you cruising around having a little fun on the street with your best friend in the back seat. AWESOME! That's what I'm looking forward to!
You mind if I ask you a few questions on your TKO install?
You mind if I ask you a few questions on your TKO install?
#4
Autogear and other Muncie trans aftermarket suppliers have upgraded cases, midplates, gears, etc. They'll have info on ratings.
Note a lot of a trans rating is based on 1st gear. The higher numeric 1st gear number, the lower the rating.
Note a lot of a trans rating is based on 1st gear. The higher numeric 1st gear number, the lower the rating.
#7
I'm leaning towards the TKO 600. The only thing that I have for the transmission is the clutch pedal assembly and the crossmember. I have a few questions for anyone who's willing to help:
What should I do to the crankshaft to accept a manual transmission. It's an automatic crankshaft? I know they make a pilot bearing that you can press inside the crankshaft to accept a manual transmission, but I've searched and read bad things about the bearing spinning or coming apart.
What flywheel should I get? I saw one from PRW that seems reasonably priced.
What clutch/pressure plate for street application would you guys recommend?
And finally, are any of you in the KC metro area?
#8
He's a thread, with drawings, pertaining to drilling the crank for a manual transmission: https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-question.html
#9
Both engines are externally balanced, but with differing counterweighting on the damper and flywheel; 64-7 is one type, 68-up the other. Jerico with road race sliders will hold up and you can get up to 3.29 first ratio.
#11
Since the 455 is externally balanced, I can have my current rotating assembly w/ flexplate balanced and later down the line get the flywheel balanced just like the flexplate?
#12
Is there a 4-speed manual transmission made for olds that can live behind a 455 producing 600 lbs. of torque, or is the TKO 600 the only option?
I have a 69 olds cutlass project car that I'm building which was originally a 350 olds powered motor and a 4-speed manual transmission. The original engine and transmission are both gone. I thought about putting a stoutly built 200-4r behind the 455, but I wanted the fun factor of shifting gears manually. My motor is at the machine shop ready to be rebuilt. However, they cannot balance my rotating assembly until I decide on a manual or automatic transmission to either balance a flywheel or flexplate and install the pilot bearing in the crankshaft.
Also, the car currently has 3.08 gears in it which is fine for me since this will be mostly a street car. Any advice or input provided would be much appreciated.
I have a 69 olds cutlass project car that I'm building which was originally a 350 olds powered motor and a 4-speed manual transmission. The original engine and transmission are both gone. I thought about putting a stoutly built 200-4r behind the 455, but I wanted the fun factor of shifting gears manually. My motor is at the machine shop ready to be rebuilt. However, they cannot balance my rotating assembly until I decide on a manual or automatic transmission to either balance a flywheel or flexplate and install the pilot bearing in the crankshaft.
Also, the car currently has 3.08 gears in it which is fine for me since this will be mostly a street car. Any advice or input provided would be much appreciated.
Last edited by ccdriver; July 26th, 2013 at 04:28 AM.
#13
I've had a TKO-600(.64 overdrive) in my '68 for 3 years now.....No complaints. runs like a swiss watch. Yes you have to cut the trans tunnel(at least I did to keep proper driveshaft angle) I went with the hydraulic clutch release and couldn't be happier.
Get the crank drilled properly for the pilot bearing....just in case.
I'm running 3.73's on my 468 and it gets 15+ mpg hwy in OD.
Food for thought
I am wary about that SS700 trans.....no feedback on it yet
Get the crank drilled properly for the pilot bearing....just in case.
I'm running 3.73's on my 468 and it gets 15+ mpg hwy in OD.
Food for thought
I am wary about that SS700 trans.....no feedback on it yet
#15
So tell me exactly what I need to do about the crankshaft. I have a nodular iron "CN" stamped crank. Should I get the bronze bushing or a roller bearing? The issue or issues that must be addressed is the depth of the relief area in the back o the crankshaft so the input shaft of the transmission doesn't bottom out and installing the bearing or bushing in the back of the crankshaft, right?
I think I get the depth issue. Drill about 1/2" into the back is the crank. However, does the bushing/bearing just press into the back of the crank or is there machining that need to be done for the bearing/bushing to fit? Also, I've heard there were auto crankshafts that were machined to receive the pilot bearing/bushing. Is this true or myth?
I think I get the depth issue. Drill about 1/2" into the back is the crank. However, does the bushing/bearing just press into the back of the crank or is there machining that need to be done for the bearing/bushing to fit? Also, I've heard there were auto crankshafts that were machined to receive the pilot bearing/bushing. Is this true or myth?
#16
So tell me exactly what I need to do about the crankshaft. I have a nodular iron "CN" stamped crank. Should I get the bronze bushing or a roller bearing? The issue or issues that must be addressed is the depth of the relief area in the back o the crankshaft so the input shaft of the transmission doesn't bottom out and installing the bearing or bushing in the back of the crankshaft, right?
I think I get the depth issue. Drill about 1/2" into the back is the crank. However, does the bushing/bearing just press into the back of the crank or is there machining that need to be done for the bearing/bushing to fit? Also, I've heard there were auto crankshafts that were machined to receive the pilot bearing/bushing. Is this true or myth?
I think I get the depth issue. Drill about 1/2" into the back is the crank. However, does the bushing/bearing just press into the back of the crank or is there machining that need to be done for the bearing/bushing to fit? Also, I've heard there were auto crankshafts that were machined to receive the pilot bearing/bushing. Is this true or myth?
Last edited by ccdriver; July 31st, 2013 at 03:21 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Delmont 88 425
Cars For Sale
4
January 9th, 2011 12:28 PM
fast67vellen2o
Parts For Sale
0
December 28th, 2010 11:32 AM
fast67vellen2o
Parts For Sale
0
September 27th, 2010 12:18 PM