Question on rear suspension 1967 Cutlass Supreme

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 20th, 2013, 02:38 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
H8D-67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 73
Question on rear suspension 1967 Cutlass Supreme

Was killing some more spiders on my new 67 Cutlass Supreme and noticed it looked like it had coilovers in the rear. I figure this isn't factory and maybe previous owner replaced standard springs but they are in there too. Anybody have any insight on these coilovers and maybe if I should just throw in some normal shocks. Cant get a part # off of them yet. Heres a pic.

2013-08-20142402_zps51117a89.png
H8D-67 is offline  
Old August 20th, 2013, 02:41 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,096
If they seem to work ok and the rear height is to your liking then keep em...
Oldsmaniac is offline  
Old August 20th, 2013, 02:57 PM
  #3  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
+1.

They're called "helper springs" or "helper shocks." They're intended to fix low ride height from sagging rear springs.
If you remove them, your rear will probably sink.

The only thing wrong with having them is that if you ever want to install a new set of shocks, you will lose that extra boost, so you will probably need to get new springs at the same time.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old August 20th, 2013, 02:59 PM
  #4  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,053
Those are coil assist shocks, they were a substitute for air shocks. BTW you can still buy them new.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old August 20th, 2013, 03:01 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,432
Actually, I'd be wondering about all the wetness that photo shows. There's dampness on the differential cover, on the axle, on that connecting arm above the differential, and on that vent line coming off the gas tank. Or is that all just undercoating?
jaunty75 is offline  
Old August 20th, 2013, 03:20 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
H8D-67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 73
Hmm, the ride height seems actually a little high for my taste. I guess eventually when I get the rims/tires I want ill swap em out with new springs/shocks to drop it properly. Thanks for the help guys!

Originally Posted by MDchanic
+1.

They're called "helper springs" or "helper shocks." They're intended to fix low ride height from sagging rear springs.
If you remove them, your rear will probably sink.

The only thing wrong with having them is that if you ever want to install a new set of shocks, you will lose that extra boost, so you will probably need to get new springs at the same time.

- Eric
H8D-67 is offline  
Old August 20th, 2013, 03:21 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
H8D-67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 73
Haha dont worry the dampness was from me, I sprayed the crap out of the undercarriage with spider killer because i had a black widow problem when I got it.


Originally Posted by jaunty75
Actually, I'd be wondering about all the wetness that photo shows. There's dampness on the differential cover, on the axle, on that connecting arm above the differential, and on that vent line coming off the gas tank. Or is that all just undercoating?
H8D-67 is offline  
Old August 21st, 2013, 10:41 AM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,237
The problem with helper shocks (and air shocks) is that the frame attach points for the shocks are not designed to carry the full weight of the car. Get correct shocks and new springs, or at least get Air Lift bags that go inside the springs and put the load into the spring pockets in the frame, which ARE designed to carry the weight of the car.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old August 21st, 2013, 11:38 AM
  #9  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,053
I've never had any issues with those type of shocks and frame damage. I agree with the issues with air shocks.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old August 21st, 2013, 11:51 AM
  #10  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,237
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
I've never had any issues with those type of shocks and frame damage. I agree with the issues with air shocks.
And again, this is proving a negative (like proving that deer whistles work). They fact that you personally never used overload shocks with stiff enough springs over a long enough period of time to fatigue the attach points just makes you lucky. As a structures engineer, I can tell you that this eccentric loading is not what the shock attach points were designed to carry. I have fatigue-cracked a frame at this location.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old August 21st, 2013, 11:58 AM
  #11  
Old School Olds
 
tru-blue 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marble Falls TX
Posts: 9,029
Needs to be a sticky.

Well then.
There you go.
Thanks Joe.
tru-blue 442 is offline  
Old August 21st, 2013, 01:09 PM
  #12  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
And again, this is proving a negative (like proving that deer whistles work).
... And you won't see any elephants walking down your street any time soon either.

You can thank me at your leisure for my constant finger snapping that keeps them away.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old August 21st, 2013, 01:20 PM
  #13  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,053
Deer whistles don't work?????
oldcutlass is online now  
Old August 21st, 2013, 04:14 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
jag1886's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Boise ID
Posts: 1,275
I sold hundreds of sets of those when I worked in a parts store back in the 70's and 80's never had any problems with them. Most of them where for people using there car to pull a camper or boat to keep the car level and they normally made the rear of the car sit a little high when not towing.
jag1886 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djl
The Newbie Forum
21
July 5th, 2015 06:40 PM
dprestia
Suspension & Handling
17
October 20th, 2014 07:34 PM
Tburg7810
Suspension & Handling
18
September 26th, 2014 11:03 AM
LoganMiller68
General Questions
3
March 12th, 2012 10:44 AM
JSGD1966
Chassis/Body/Frame
1
December 5th, 2007 01:23 PM



Quick Reply: Question on rear suspension 1967 Cutlass Supreme



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 PM.