Moog springs #5390 or #5450?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 8th, 2012 | 04:08 PM
  #1  
Fummins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 133
From: Northern California
Moog springs #5390 or #5450?

Im doing a motor/trans swap from 350/350 to big block 4spd on my 1969 Cutlass, seemed like the logical time to rebuild the UCA/LCA and sway bar bushing. My old springs measure right at 17.25 tall unsprung. Moog as you know has two offerings that im considering, the 5390 and the 5450. While i believe the 5390's will work im considering the 5450's as well. My car has 18" nittto lo profile tires on the front and im concerned about rubbing with the 5390 since it has a lower unsprung height out of the box (16.63) than my 43 year old springs (17.25). The 5450 is even shorter at 15.63. The 5450 shows loaded height at 12" and the 5350 is 11" loaded. The ride quality is definitely a concern as i dont want my fillings rattled loose over every bump in the road. My sense is the 5450 is the way to go. Any one been in my shoes on this? Thanks
Old October 8th, 2012 | 04:53 PM
  #2  
Fummins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 133
From: Northern California
I should also add that the 5390 Shows a spring rate of 336# which is more than the stock springs i took out.....
Old October 8th, 2012 | 05:51 PM
  #3  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
I put the 5450s in my driver SBO 350 all stock it rides nice , I also added a 1.25" fr sway bar and 1" rear sw bar at the same time.

future plans call for a BBO and from what ive read the BBO is +50lbs on the SBO...so really not to far apart
Old October 8th, 2012 | 07:05 PM
  #4  
Fummins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 133
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by RetroRanger
I put the 5450s in my driver SBO 350 all stock it rides nice , I also added a 1.25" fr sway bar and 1" rear sw bar at the same time.

future plans call for a BBO and from what ive read the BBO is +50lbs on the SBO...so really not to far apart
Nice. No chop to the ride? So the front dosent want to roll over on hard accel/braking in corners? Did the rear sway bar make a noticeable difference performance wise?

Last edited by Fummins; October 8th, 2012 at 07:09 PM. Reason: More detail
Old October 8th, 2012 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
RetroRanger's Avatar
72 Olds CS
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
Originally Posted by Fummins
Nice. No chop to the ride? So the front dosent want to roll over on hard accel/braking in corners? Did the rear sway bar make a noticeable difference performance wise?

I dont really hammer on it hard but I do drive it. I put on over 2k in the last year. It rides and handles well compared to a stock 40 yo suspension in good condition.

I really only drove it home unregistered before adding the sw bars so I cant say I was even exceeding the speed limit before
Old October 9th, 2012 | 12:22 PM
  #6  
Fummins's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 133
From: Northern California
Originally Posted by RetroRanger
I dont really hammer on it hard but I do drive it. I put on over 2k in the last year. It rides and handles well compared to a stock 40 yo suspension in good condition.

I really only drove it home unregistered before adding the sw bars so I cant say I was even exceeding the speed limit before
Understood, thanks for your info.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kbdecatur
Suspension & Handling
1
January 9th, 2013 04:16 PM
doc
Parts For Sale
5
March 30th, 2012 09:41 PM
RetroRanger
Suspension & Handling
11
October 3rd, 2011 08:07 AM
JeremyTA
Suspension & Handling
5
May 16th, 2011 07:29 PM
defiant1
Suspension & Handling
3
April 16th, 2011 11:34 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:23 PM.