350 camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 12, 2014 | 06:51 PM
  #81  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
They where not s/s they ran in different stock classes F/S ect etc but I don't think they shared the same of the rules the s/s guys did. There is some guys in the "pure stock" classes and on bias ply's I think a 68 ram rod ran 13.0's . I asked this question years ago but im still curious as to what guys did back in the day running the stock classes with he w31's .
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 06:23 AM
  #82  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by joesw31
captjim. I remember watching them run 12.70s.
That's a good number, that would be an honest 350 HP plus.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 07:43 AM
  #83  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
You can get 350hp out of a 350 as mentioned, and by the way the factory did it.
My point was, in answer to the op, that he wasn't going to make 350hp and over 400tq as desired with his combination. That being a stock intake, his current heads, the cam recommended by gearman and stock exhaust manifolds. I think that would be stretch at the very least.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 07:46 AM
  #84  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Just to clarify, I do not think that getting 350 HP out of a 350 Olds is difficult, that is only 1 HP per CI. My last 355 probably made that (ported heads, 10.25 to 1, 227/233 cam) but since I never ran or dyno'd it, cant say for sure. But making 350 HP using today's fuel and keeping decent manners and fun to drive is a bit more challenging.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 09:30 AM
  #85  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
Jim was that the voodoo cam ? I think that's what I'm running now .
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 10:26 AM
  #86  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
Jim was that the voodoo cam ? I think that's what I'm running now .
YES, 60803 IIRC?? Ran great, nice idle. A tad noisy, Mark HATES them! LOL

Last edited by captjim; Sep 13, 2014 at 11:23 AM.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 10:41 AM
  #87  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,395
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by joesw31
My understanding is that the 325 HP was low, and changing the timing and metering rods, they got somewhere between 345 and 350 HP.
One of the Dave's on ROP (Hilea maybe?) once posted that his W-31 dynoed 360 hp @ 6500 and was still increasing, but they didn't get readings above that for some reason I can't remember. He said the factory rating of 325 hp @ 5400 RPM was correct but the engine kept making power well beyond that.

Too bad all that info was lost in one of the forum crashes.

Last edited by Fun71; Sep 13, 2014 at 10:49 AM.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 11:25 AM
  #88  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Fun71
One of the Dave's on ROP (Hilea maybe?) once posted that his W-31 dynoed 360 hp @ 6500 and was still increasing, but they didn't get readings above that for some reason I can't remember. He said the factory rating of 325 hp @ 5400 RPM was correct but the engine kept making power well beyond that.

Too bad all that info was lost in one of the forum crashes.
Pretty sure he posts here, too. Hard to believe it kept pulling beyond 6500 with stock manis, but I believe you.
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 04:04 PM
  #89  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
Nevermind jim I think I have the next one up lol. I think that's the one I wanted and I decided to just go as big as I could .
Old Sep 13, 2014 | 08:56 PM
  #90  
Barry Jones's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 114
What did I miss ?
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 08:24 AM
  #91  
76olds's Avatar
Hookers under Hood
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 3,543
From: Ontario, Canada
Just the usual "CAM POPPER" question.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 10:35 AM
  #92  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,395
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by captjim
Pretty sure he posts here, too. Hard to believe it kept pulling beyond 6500 with stock manis, but I believe you.
If you mean exhaust manifolds, then likely no. I remember him posting that Olds didn't bother with a unique exhaust manifold for the W-31 as the intended engine application was (open?) headers for drag racing and the engines were set up for that, and Olds expected the factory manifolds would get tossed in the trash.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 11:06 AM
  #93  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Fun71
If you mean exhaust manifolds, then likely no. I remember him posting that Olds didn't bother with a unique exhaust manifold for the W-31 as the intended engine application was (open?) headers for drag racing and the engines were set up for that, and Olds expected the factory manifolds would get tossed in the trash.
That makes more sense.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 03:56 PM
  #94  
jag1886's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,275
From: Boise ID
Originally Posted by GEARMAN69
Barring any more snarky comments I am done too.
Thank God and Greyhound you're gone. Go whack a mole on a Pontiac sight.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 06:30 PM
  #95  
GEARMAN69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,484
From: ENNIS TEXAS
Originally Posted by jag1886
Thank God and Greyhound you're gone. Go whack a mole on a Pontiac sight.
Still here friend, your quite the contributor yourself.

Last edited by GEARMAN69; Sep 14, 2014 at 06:34 PM.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 06:33 PM
  #96  
Barry Jones's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 114
Originally Posted by GEARMAN69
Still here A hole
Really ???? Is this what you bring to the forum ?? That is very sad.
Old Sep 14, 2014 | 07:31 PM
  #97  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,475
From: Poteau, Ok
Ok everyone, lets lighten up a bit before it gets out of hand.
Old Sep 15, 2014 | 09:58 AM
  #98  
JohnnyBs68S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,647
From: Ft. Wayne, IN
For grins and giggles, I'd like to see all of those vintage road tests on 350" LeMans and Chevelles running in the 13s bone stock.
Old Sep 15, 2014 | 10:34 AM
  #99  
oldzzy's Avatar
wait.... what....
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 817
From: London Ont Canada
Originally Posted by JohnnyBs68S
For grins and giggles, I'd like to see all of those vintage road tests on 350" LeMans and Chevelles running in the 13s bone stock.
Old Oct 3, 2014 | 10:12 AM
  #100  
74sprint's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 122
From: Winnipeg
OP is a Twit

Personally I think both GEARMAN69 & cutlassefi are correct in there suggestions. I also think the real twit is the OP, he supplied no real worth while information other than 69 F85 with a 350. With all the information that is available here and on the internet, he can't even help himself. Not to mention that if he was really sincere he would have contacted a cam manufacturer to get his answer. The OP is so lazy he thinks that swapping a cam into an engine he knows nothing about will some how magically give him 350hp and 400tq. These are the type of guys that when they ask you a question like that, you tell them to put a stock big block in it and they will get everything they want. You can have Hp or gas mileage, pick one and only one. If they want to keep their motor and are really sincere about modifing their engine, you tell them to get their heads flowed and then come back, lots don't come back.

As for all the numbers I've seen being tossed around here, to me they are all subjective and provide for no real baseline to help this twit out. He could have at least opened his hood and told us what heads he had on his motor. Who knows, maybe after all these years maybe someone stuck a 307 in his car. Guys put yourselves in the shoes of a cam tech on the phone trying to help this guy, did he supply you with enough information too even give an educated answer?

Oh GEARMAN69 welcome to the calmer and friendlier Olds website, as compared to ROP. I’m sort of in the same shoes as you, I have a 74 Pontiac Ventura with a 455 Olds. Time wise rebuilding or building engine on the side I have done mostly BBOs. I have also worked on small engines to 3,000hp locomotives and everything in between. As for racing, the last 19 years have mostly been working on 800-2,000hp BBCs in the Top-Sportsman classes, but I have also worked on Chrysler, Ford, Pontiac, and imports for extra cash. Now that I’m semi-retired it’s nice to finally get back to my own Olds.

Cheers
Ray
Old Oct 4, 2014 | 11:56 PM
  #101  
80 Rocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 383
Originally Posted by captjim
And, IMO, stock heads won't get to an honest 350 HP.
Remember that 84 Delta I did a motor for years ago (2007?), and I posted the build on ROP, and it became an epic bashfest? That had stock #4 heads, small valves, no porting. 10.3:1 compression, in a 355......the car was full dress which was probably 3700-3800lbs. I went 12.74 @ 103mph in it. That's not 350hp, but pretty damn close.

Anyways, that car sat in a garage all this time.....up until a few days ago. It's now at my shop. I bought it for a friend (he owes me for it).

The car is gutted now so it obviously went on a diet. Anyways, knowing what I know now......I wanna see some 12.3x timeslips from it with the engine in its current state.

The car is very streetable.

Last edited by 80 Rocket; Oct 4, 2014 at 11:59 PM.
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 03:54 AM
  #102  
RocketV8's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 145
From: Mora, Sweden
Originally Posted by 80 Rocket
Remember that 84 Delta I did a motor for years ago (2007?), and I posted the build on ROP, and it became an epic bashfest? That had stock #4 heads, small valves, no porting. 10.3:1 compression, in a 355......the car was full dress which was probably 3700-3800lbs. I went 12.74 @ 103mph in it. That's not 350hp, but pretty damn close.

Anyways, that car sat in a garage all this time.....up until a few days ago. It's now at my shop. I bought it for a friend (he owes me for it).

The car is gutted now so it obviously went on a diet. Anyways, knowing what I know now......I wanna see some 12.3x timeslips from it with the engine in its current state.

The car is very streetable.
Yeah, I remember looking at that build while planning my 330. Impressive. Would you care to share some details, memory is a little foggy...
Old Oct 5, 2014 | 10:18 AM
  #103  
Warhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,012
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by RocketV8
Yeah, I remember looking at that build while planning my 330. Impressive. Would you care to share some details, memory is a little foggy...
Many remember that, and it was an inspiration to many on both sites. Some cried foul.
Anyways, power is in the combination, and how well all of it works together. Have a starting point, and (hating this term) "upgrade" from there.
I feel that you must have a fresh set of good heads and a good working air pump below them before many other upgrades, and too many (maybe I am assuming the OP also) just want to cam it up for power increase. The cam will come, but one must ascertain what they have before they start ordering parts.
The results usually put everyone's ego's in check.
JMO
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jimmy Jo
Small Blocks
2
Aug 22, 2014 09:21 PM
Jimmy Jo
Small Blocks
2
Jul 27, 2014 07:20 PM
oldzy
Small Blocks
18
Jun 1, 2011 05:02 PM
HARDLUCK88
Small Blocks
15
Jul 29, 2009 06:08 PM
mrstevek79
Small Blocks
0
Apr 30, 2008 04:25 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 AM.