Which Small Block Olds is Better

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 5, 2008 | 04:52 PM
  #1  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
Which Small Block Olds is Better

If you wanted to build a "warmed over daily driver" small block Olds for a '78 Cutlass, which one of these two motors would be the better choice (explanations welcomed):

'69 Olds 350 with #5 heads

Olds 403 with #5 heads
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:25 AM
  #2  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,224
From: Edmond, OK
If you are just building a daily driver you might be happier with the 403. It has a little bit more displacement and you will run the same heads on either engine so that won't be an issue. The big isssue with 403s is that they have windowed mains so it makes it more difficult to rev them higher. However, if you are just going to have a weekend warrior you probably won't red line the engine often.

Then again, I have heard 403s have cooling issues since they have siamese cylinders. This can be overcome with a radiator and fan in good working condition though.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 11:12 AM
  #3  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
Olds64,
Thanks for your input. If I went with the 403, I'd pick a torque cam in the 1400-4800 RPM range. I'd strive for a compression in the 9.5 to 1 or 10.1 range in order to keep things "pump-gas friendly". The #5's would allow me to achieve that compression easily. Thank you.

78cutlass
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 04:47 PM
  #4  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,224
From: Edmond, OK
Well, don't base your decision solely on what I say. The 350 has merits too. Keep this post near the top and I am sure you will get alot more opinions. It is always good to get as much info as possible.
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #5  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by Olds64
........ The big isssue with 403s is that they have windowed mains ........
I have also heard that. In reality, it would depend what power level is being discussed.



For a "warmed over daily driver" windowed mains should not be an issue.

........ Then again, I have heard 403s have cooling issues ........
I have only heard that from one person. Looks like you have the 403 confused with a 400 Chev.

Norm
Old Feb 6, 2008 | 11:38 PM
  #6  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
88 Coupe,
I'd be content with 350 HP/350 FT LB TQ Olds small block motor as a daily driver. I think the '69 W-31 350, which was the "top dog" 350 motor, was a 325 HP/360 TQ motor. The regular '69 4-barrel 350 was about 310 HP/390 TQ! For a street driven car I'd be more interested in having a torquey motor than anything else, especially with the fact that a '78 Cutlass isn't a light car.

Last edited by 78cutlass; Feb 6, 2008 at 11:47 PM.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:03 AM
  #7  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by 78cutlass
88 Coupe ........
78cutlass.

Originally Posted by 78cutlass
........ I'd be content with ........
I do not know anything about all those numbers, and I certainly do not need BOLD fonts, to aid my reading comprehension.

Originally Posted by 78cutlass
........ For a street driven car I'd be more interested ........
I'm sure you will be happy with whatever you choose.

Originally Posted by 78cutlass
........ a '78 Cutlass isn't a light car.
Thank you for telling me, but I already know how heavy it is.

Now, what was your point?

Norm
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 04:55 AM
  #8  
f-85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,507
From: Paw Paw,IL 61353
Damn Norm somebaody having a bad day? Or you probably already know that.


Josh
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 05:23 AM
  #9  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,224
From: Edmond, OK
However, if you are just going to have a weekend warrior you probably won't red line the engine often.
Thus he won't have to worry about the windowed mains.

I have heard 403s have cooling issues
Key words being "I have heard." If you really want to know where I heard then you can go over to Oldspower.com and do some reading. Those guys there seem to know their stuff.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 06:22 AM
  #10  
tonycpe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 126
From: Cheboygan, Michigan
the people at oldspower seem to have problems installing a rear view mirror.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #11  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
Hmm, which one will I use:

'69 Olds 350 with #5 heads

Olds 403 with #5's

I think I'll build the '69 as a "warmed-over daily driver" for my '78 Cutlass
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:24 PM
  #12  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by tonycpe
the people at oldspower seem to have problems installing a rear view mirror.
That's not nice! It's funny, but not nice!!!

Couple of things. First, those high torque 350s are high compression engines, in the 10.25 to 1 range, not really practical on today's pump gas. Second, as far as Oldsmobiles go, a 78 Cutlass is about the LIGHTEST car they made. I am no great 403 fan, but for a mild build it will work fine. Do your research on pistons and heads, you can easily end up with too much CR using the #5s. Personally, if I was going to do a 403, I would use the 4A head and the KBs, cr ends up around 9.6, perfect for pump gas. The 4As already have 1/2" bolt holes, correct dowel pin sizes, and big intake valves. A little work on the exhaust and you are good to go. If it is your first build, IMHO the 350 is easier and a little more forgiving.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 01:58 PM
  #13  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
a 403 build sure sounds tempting. I'll need to find one first.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 02:01 PM
  #14  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
captjim, you brought up some good points....
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 02:07 PM
  #15  
78cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
78cutlass
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 134
From: Florida
I agree, a compression ratio of about 9.5 to 1 or 9.6 as you mentioned would be perfect for a street car.
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 07:58 PM
  #16  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by f-85
........ somebaody having a bad day? ........
No.

I sent a simple reply, to a message with my name on it, followed by a question regarding its content. If it did not have my name on it, I would have ignored it.

What did you read into my post, that I did not write into it?

Norm
Old Feb 7, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #17  
88 coupe's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,212
From: Southern CA
Originally Posted by Olds64
........ Key words being "I have heard." ........
Kinda like when a "redneck" starts his story with "y'all ain't gonna believe this s**t".

Originally Posted by Olds64
........ you can go over to Oldspower.com and do some reading ........
Been there, done that.

You can go over to Real Oldspower.com and do some reading.

Originally Posted by Olds64
........ Those guys there seem to know their stuff.
Key words being "seem to know".

Originally Posted by tonycpe
the people at oldspower seem to have problems installing a rear view mirror.
Nuff said.


Norm
Old Feb 8, 2008 | 05:23 AM
  #18  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,224
From: Edmond, OK
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bocoogto
General Discussion
33
Aug 26, 2023 06:09 PM
TicTocTach
Parts For Sale
1
Jan 31, 2014 10:19 AM
193072olds
Big Blocks
3
Feb 20, 2013 09:47 AM
Wyze
General Discussion
40
Sep 2, 2010 07:24 PM
citcapp
Small Blocks
5
Jan 31, 2009 04:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:37 AM.