307 Intake on my 71 350?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 04:40 AM
  #1  
Sturgeon's Avatar
Thread Starter
71 Cutlass Supreme
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
From: Rochester, New York
307 Intake on my 71 350?

It appears that I have an intake manifold from a mid 80's 307 installed in my 71 Cutlass Supreme's 350 block (with a Edelbrock 1405 600 cfm carb). Anyone have thoughts on how this would impact performance? The ID# on the manifold is 22528212. What would you recommend as a better performance combination?
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 05:59 AM
  #2  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,963
From: Central Missouri
You can go here to see what is says http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofinm.htm
May you allready have.....

It has smaller ports, so it would lower the total performance potential.

Good thing is, its aluminum, so your saving weight. For a street car, its not hurting you a great deal. Obviously you want more power. Now, unless you want to spend some coin, you could get the Edelbrock peroformer, or locate one of the desirable factory ones from a w car. By the way, they are being reproduced now.
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 08:34 AM
  #3  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Meh. I wouldn't worry about it if it's just a regular driver.
I put an edelbrock performer on my daily driver for kicks one day and didn't notice a spit of difference, except that I was short on lunch money for a while.
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 09:29 AM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,771
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Sturgeon
It appears that I have an intake manifold from a mid 80's 307 installed in my 71 Cutlass Supreme's 350 block (with a Edelbrock 1405 600 cfm carb). Anyone have thoughts on how this would impact performance? The ID# on the manifold is 22528212. What would you recommend as a better performance combination?
The early 80s A4 intake is a good replacement for an iron SBO intake. Good size ports and comparable breathing in a lightweight package. The late 80s A5 isn't even a good doorstop.
Old Oct 7, 2007 | 02:11 PM
  #5  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,209
From: Edmond, OK
I put an edelbrock performer on my daily driver for kicks one day and didn't notice a spit of difference.
I have also heard that the Edelbrock performer doesn't do much for HP. The Performer RPM might be a better choice.
Old Oct 8, 2007 | 07:29 AM
  #6  
Sturgeon's Avatar
Thread Starter
71 Cutlass Supreme
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
From: Rochester, New York
Thanks for the feedback... I was shopping for a daily driver when I bought my car, but I wound up with a beautiful body restoration... great chrome, great black paint, new top. Really looks incredible, so now I'm afraid to drive it as much as i planned to.

I'll be dropping some money into door panels to finish the interior, then I was thinking about maybe $1Kish in engine improvements (maybe headers, etc) to get a better sound and a bit more performance. Right now I'm trying to understand exactly what I have under the hood... I bought the car for the body, even though it drives without issue.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
falconsfan
Small Blocks
9
May 14, 2015 05:47 AM
carbonf00tprint
Small Blocks
20
Nov 4, 2012 07:53 AM
fast67vellen2o
Parts For Sale
0
Oct 24, 2010 06:11 PM
Beeterolds
Parts For Sale
0
Dec 27, 2008 10:07 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:09 PM.