307 Exhaust manifolds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
307 Exhaust manifolds

I know the 85s are the better of the 307, but how would that compare to a set of headers. Anyone have real numbers?

This is a stcok 350 in an 84 Cutlass.

Thanks.

sb
Old Feb 8, 2010 | 07:55 PM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
Manifolds are no comparison to headers. Olds manifolds are rather restrictive from the get go.
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #3  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Ok.

I have built LOTS of mopars. I've even built a few fords. I've had the opportunity to drive them back to back with manifolds and with headers. To be honest, every time I did the swap to headers, I felt like I spent a lot of $$$ and time (especially on the mopars they suck for putting in headers!!!!) for very little return. In fact, the last 5 Mopars I built I used the cast iron manifolds. These included 3 slant sixes, a 318 and a high compression 400.

If this in not the case with Oldsmobiles, I'll spend the $80 extra (and time?) to put headers on over the cost of the JY cast iron manifolds.

Talk me into it.

sb
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 05:21 AM
  #4  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,225
From: Edmond, OK
What other modifications have you done to the engine? If you don't have an aftermarket intake manfiold, high quality SBO heads, an aftermarket cam, and good carburetor then headers would be a waste of money IMHO. Of course, if you want to do all of these mods to your SBO then headers are a good place to start. You will gain decent HP and have a difference in the exhaust tone.
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 06:15 AM
  #5  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Good point Olds 64.

All those mopars listed in the earlier post had more into them than this 350 does...the slants all had oversize valves, significant porting, milled for high compression, Erson 270* cams and at least a stock 2bbl or holley 350, 2200 stall converter backed by a 3.55-4.10 gear. The 318 had oversize valves, bored .060 over, 214* @ .50 cam, high compression pistons, 625 cfm 4bbl, AM intake (single plane), 2500 stall convertor backed by a 3.55 gear. The 400 was milled .100 for compression, AM 4bbl intake (dual plane), mild after market cam (don't remember specs), backed by 3.21 gear.

The only aftermarket (high performance) parts on this olds build are: "high performance" distributor, 2500 stall converter, FANCY summit transmission (WAAAY more transmission than needed), and as soon as I get the exhaust put on, 3.42 gears in the rear end.

Otherwise it is completely stock short block with 5a heads, factory 4bbl intake, and stock replacement parts. Will I one day build a bigger & better motor? Maybe. The 403 I was looking at is GONE. So, for now, I will keep my rescued 350.

sb
Old Feb 9, 2010 | 09:52 PM
  #6  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Headers on a 140 horsepower motor is definitely not worth the aggravation.
5a heads came on 307 motors, not 350's.
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 05:51 AM
  #7  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Sorry. 3a heads....wait...a stock 350 Olds makes 140HP?

Wow.

sb

Last edited by 80_cutlass; Feb 13, 2010 at 07:11 AM. Reason: correction
Old Feb 10, 2010 | 11:25 AM
  #8  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
No. I think the lowest rating was either 175 or 180 HP. 140 was the 307.
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 09:26 AM
  #9  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Either way, it's still sad lol.
You don't even start having fun until about 300 horse.
Old Feb 11, 2010 | 01:51 PM
  #10  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Well. I need to get this one moving under its own power and find a motor to build on the side. We'll see.

sb
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 07:23 AM
  #11  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Any ideas if these will fit my G-body cutlass?

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ds-shield.html

Thanks.

sb
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 11:17 AM
  #12  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
The exhaust wouldn't bolt up because the outlet on the passenger side manifold has the wrong angle on it.
If you are having a custom exhaust made they can be made to work.
Old Feb 15, 2010 | 01:36 PM
  #13  
80_cutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 197
From: Poteet, TX
Cool.

sb
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
djchunter
Parts Wanted
2
Jan 22, 2015 06:09 PM
Mred355
Parts Wanted
6
Dec 27, 2013 05:23 AM
carbonf00tprint
Small Blocks
20
Nov 4, 2012 07:53 AM
84oldsDelta88
Small Blocks
6
Dec 9, 2009 07:01 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:15 PM.