Q-JET or 1405

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 29th, 2018, 04:10 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jmcdona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9
Q-JET or 1405

I just finished installing an Edelbrock 2711 Performer intake on my 71 Cutlass Supreme 350. When I ordered the intake I also ordered a 1405 carb. When I installed the intake I decided to put the Q-Jet on initially for testing, so that I can determine if the 2711 itself is an improvement.

Anyway, after test driving the engine runs great, - a definite performance enhancement. So my question is; - will the 1405 be a performance improvement over the Q-Jet, or will the difference be marginal? The 1405 is still in the box, so I can return it with no problem. Or, are there any other carbs (Holly of some model) that's recommended?

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated!
jmcdona is offline  
Old March 29th, 2018, 04:51 AM
  #2  
72 Olds CS
 
RetroRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
I've run both carbs. From purely a driving standpoint, not a quantified performance standpoint, run the qjet.

My 1405 started ran idled fine it had an odd hesitation if I turned sharply left while heading downhill, but it was a perfectly fine driving car.

The qjet starts runs drives idles fine and has much crisper off idle acceleration.
RetroRanger is offline  
Old March 29th, 2018, 05:05 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
AZ520's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 163
I would return the 1405 and at least get the newest design with annular boosters. 1905 avs2 is the one you want. A properly tuned Q-jet is hard to beat so you might just stick with it.
AZ520 is offline  
Old March 29th, 2018, 05:28 AM
  #4  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,980
Have you gone through the Qjet thoroughly yet? The fuel filter housing leaks and the throttle plates get worn on pretty much EVERY Qjet since they're 30+ years old now. IF you haven't done these repairs then plan to before too long.

That Edelbrock carburetor might be the way to go. It will definitely give good driveability.
Olds64 is online now  
Old March 29th, 2018, 06:11 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jmcdona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 9
Thanks for the feedback

I'd say my Qjet is tuned pretty well because it's very responsive - no hesitation, and i'm currently really happy with the overal performace of my 350. I was just wondering if the 1405 would be a significant enough improvement to warrant replacing the Qjet. Looks like the 1405 is going back, - I wouldn't mind recouping some of the money that I've been putting into this project anyway!

That's funny, - i just noticed the the fuel filter is leaking slightly on the line side - good call! A little yellow teflon tape should do the trick

Thanks,
John
jmcdona is offline  
Old March 29th, 2018, 06:17 AM
  #6  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,980
The only way to repair the fuel filter housing correctly is to buy a special kit with a tap and heli-coil style insert. You can have it done by some of the carburetor specialty houses seen on the internet. It isn't a cheap repair and it isn't a cheap kit.

In the past there were new fuel filter housings available with 2 gaskets. They were a Dorman part. You might be able to find one on Ebay.

The teflon tape would probably seal the leak but be carefu. You don't want to cause problems. If the teflon tape shreds it could end up clogging a jet or something.
Olds64 is online now  
Old March 29th, 2018, 03:12 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,850
The only way to compare ANY 2 carbs is to make sure they’re both tuned correctly via a wideband O2. Otherwise it’s apples to grapefruits.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old April 1st, 2018, 06:35 AM
  #8  
elB
Registered User
 
elB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: E TN
Posts: 18
I'll also add that if you've set them both up properly there will be little to no difference in fuel economy or power. The quadrajet will offer better cold weather manners and drive-ability, but a lot of people are really attracted to shiny new stuff.

And teflon tape on the threads of the inlet will not seal it properly and will make things worse. It either needs the seal replaced or the threads and sealing surfaces cleaned up.
elB is offline  
Old April 2nd, 2018, 05:23 AM
  #9  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,980
FWIW, sometimes folks will remove the fuel filter and use JB weld to permanently attach the fuel filter housing to the carburetor. This is sort of "hill billy," but it stops the leak. You just need to make sure you run an aftermarket fuel filter before the carburetor.
Olds64 is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bansheeman6100
Parts For Sale
4
February 21st, 2015 08:14 AM
mike623
Small Blocks
5
April 12th, 2012 08:19 PM
Tony72Cutlass'S'
Small Blocks
6
July 12th, 2011 05:29 AM
billykissell
Big Blocks
16
March 31st, 2011 04:17 AM
Schober Motorsports
Parts For Sale
0
February 22nd, 2010 05:02 AM



Quick Reply: Q-JET or 1405



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:07 AM.