rocket 350 cam!
#2
You do not have enough compression to go very aggressive on the cam, IMO. Any cam big enough to "Thump" will probably make the car a dog. Something in the .450/205 neighborhood would be an upgrade, but it will still sound fairly stock.
#4
Ahh actually Jim if you put in a single pattern with small duration on a tight lobe sep you'll get good throttle response, maybe a little tone and it shouldn't be a dog. However it will run out of steam on the other end, but it can be done.
#6
Hey Kenny,
I can grind you one. Even the smallest Thump'r has too much duration for that compression ratio but the lobe sep is right.
I'd do something around a 210 or so on a 106ish lobe sep, you'll hear it a little and have decent throttle response, as long as everything else is o.k.
I can grind you one. Even the smallest Thump'r has too much duration for that compression ratio but the lobe sep is right.
I'd do something around a 210 or so on a 106ish lobe sep, you'll hear it a little and have decent throttle response, as long as everything else is o.k.
#16
I'd probably do a 106+4 and following the general rule of thumb;
The tight lobe sep will build pressure down low(106). Along with that the early intake closing (106+4 means in on a 102 intake centerline) will help do the same.
Now you add some overlap from the tight lobe sep and you get a little tone. Keep the lift in check to assist in the velocity of the incoming charge and there you go. Will it sound like a 10.0:1 455 with a big roller? Of course not, but it should have an increase in low end torque and overall power.
Hope this helps.
Last edited by cutlassefi; September 5th, 2011 at 06:15 AM.
#17
I just tore down my '70 Rocket 350, planning to stroke the crank to 3.5, bore about .098 over. I am interested in a custom CAM to go along with this set-up. I have the original heads on it, adding headers, port & polish heads and intake manifold.
What would you do for a cam?
What would you do for a cam?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post