Rebuilding 7028251 Quadrajet for 350

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 09:10 PM
  #1  
yeahbuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
Rebuilding 7028251 Quadrajet for 350

Looking to replace my current 7028250 and I got my hands on a pretty nice condition 7028251 Quadrajet that needs a rebuild. I know it was made to go on the 400/455 so my question is, what would I be required to do in order to get it to 350 specs? I heard that the jets are larger for the 251 vs 250? Thanks
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 06:58 AM
  #2  
bccan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,733
From: West Hartford, CT
http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofcrb.htm#Carbs

According to carb calibration table, primaries are the same w/ both carbs 71/49. Different secondary rods - AT vs AU.
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 08:36 PM
  #3  
yeahbuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
Would I run into performance issues I this carb on a 350 without changing the secondary rods? Other than poorer gas mileage.
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #4  
Rickman48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
A larger cam, stall convertor, and steeper gears would take advantage of the richer mixture @ WOT!
If you're not going to be 'pounding' on it, you should be fine!

Make sure you check the primary throttle shaft - wear gives you a vacuum leak!
Old Oct 19, 2010 | 09:08 PM
  #5  
yeahbuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
Originally Posted by Rickman48
If you're not going to be 'pounding' on it, you should be fine!
I use it as my daily driver. I like to punch it here and there but who doesn't. Consider myself light-footed about 80% of the time. I just dont want to run into anything that could be avoided while rebuilding.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 06:11 AM
  #6  
Rickman48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
Rich is better than lean - you're good to go!
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 08:58 AM
  #7  
bccan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,733
From: West Hartford, CT
Rich is safer but response generally mushy if the secondaries are too rich - a long drawn out drone "wooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOO," but not a lot of response. If secondaries are closer to correct/lean, response will be quicker & much more noticeable "wooOOOOAAAAAHHHH!" It will certainly work w/ what you have but you might want to hunt down some "AT" or "CL" sized rods & swap them in. http://www.oldspower.com/vb/showthread.php?t=32057 will provide a table of secondary rods, find AT & CL on second page. Power tip size is .667" (vs "AU" rod's .527"), larger is leaner & you want a long or medium tip length. AT or CL is the best choice as there is a "hole" in increments w/ the long or medium tip right in the range that would probably work best for you. I have hit that same hole on a carb I'm dialing in for my kid's red car in sig.
Very easy to do (1 min job), if switch is done, you may find a slightly tighter air door adjustment will be needed to prevent a bog. That adjustment is also very simple & quick (1 min job) If you are unfamiliar, search around & procedures should be outlined.

While editing I just saw Bill's comment about Pwr Piston spring - good point! Do you have the ability/willingness to do some disassembly? You need to pop the top off carb to make this change & you would need a lighter spring & maybe a gasket. You may have a pretty rich idle if this detail is not attended to.

Last edited by bccan; Oct 20, 2010 at 09:19 AM.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 09:09 AM
  #8  
BILL DEMMER's Avatar
Just the facts...
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,259
From: THE GREAT WIDE-OPEN
what may bite you is the power piston spring, the 251 spring is much stiffer and will likely over-richen your primary mixture. the 250 uses a 7036019 spring which has a cut-in point roughly half of the 7037734 used in the 251.

everybody always overlooks this critical detail.


bill
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 09:43 AM
  #9  
yeahbuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
Originally Posted by bccan
Rich is safer but response generally mushy if the secondaries are too rich - a long drawn out drone "wooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOO," but not a lot of response. If secondaries are closer to correct/lean, response will be quicker & much more noticeable "wooOOOOAAAAAHHHH!" It will certainly work w/ what you have but you might want to hunt down some "AT" or "CL" sized rods & swap them in. http://www.oldspower.com/vb/showthread.php?t=32057 will provide a table of secondary rods, find AT & CL on second page. Power tip size is .667" (vs "AU" rod's .527"), larger is leaner & you want a long or medium tip length. AT or CL is the best choice as there is a "hole" in increments w/ the long or medium tip right in the range that would probably work best for you. I have hit that same hole on a carb I'm dialing in for my kid's red car in sig.
Very easy to do (1 min job), if switch is done, you may find a slightly tighter air door adjustment will be needed to prevent a bog. That adjustment is also very simple & quick (1 min job) If you are unfamiliar, search around & procedures should be outlined.

While editing I just saw Bill's comment about Pwr Piston spring - good point! Do you have the ability/willingness to do some disassembly? You need to pop the top off carb to make this change & you would need a lighter spring & maybe a gasket. You may have a pretty rich idle if this detail is not attended to.
Great info thank you very much! Just what I was looking for. I plan on buying a rebuild kit, CL secondary rods, accellorator pump and float from quadrajetparts.com. They dont carry specific power piston springs. Any idea where I would be able to find one? Is it something I am going to be removing while rebuilding anyway? Thanks again
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 11:14 AM
  #10  
bccan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,733
From: West Hartford, CT
The power piston springs typically come in a 4 pack of different tensions which correspond to your engine's vacuum demand/production(chicken/egg). You can test them & find one that is lighter than what comes out of there. Check your choke pull off (little vacuum can near choke linkage) & make sure it is good before ordering parts. This would be apart when you go through it, under the primary power piston that has the primary rods hanging off it.

Bill - Do you have any vacuum specs that correspond to the OE spring part #'s?

Last edited by bccan; Oct 20, 2010 at 11:51 AM.
Old Oct 20, 2010 | 05:57 PM
  #11  
BILL DEMMER's Avatar
Just the facts...
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,259
From: THE GREAT WIDE-OPEN
if you want a rochester 7036019, i can supply it.
iirc, the cut-in point is 8" HG. the 7037734 cuts-in about 14" HG.


bill

Last edited by BILL DEMMER; Oct 20, 2010 at 05:59 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2010 | 01:02 AM
  #12  
yeahbuddy's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 913
Thank you everyone who posted.

I had one more question. I purchased this carb from someone who has no knowledge of its history. Its overall condition based on looks alone is cleaner/better shape than the QJet that is currently running on my car. If I were to want to test it before rebuilding, should I just blow compressed air through the whole thing? Or possible spray everything with carb cleaner? Thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jetstar 88
General Discussion
4
Sep 3, 2011 08:24 AM
JIM'S w30
Parts Wanted
0
Mar 11, 2011 04:29 PM
yeahbuddy
Cutlass
5
Oct 11, 2010 05:53 PM
agtw31
Parts For Sale
1
Aug 11, 2009 07:16 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 AM.