looking for some advice for setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 13th, 2013, 05:40 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hawks70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Macedon,NY
Posts: 137
looking for some advice for setup

Mainly want to know what cfm Carb and torque converter will help me get most from this setup. Its a rebuilt 350. Stock bore and stroke .the heads are being milled to compensate for thicker head gaskets , all new seats and parts. I'll be using the original 350 trans rebuilt with a shift kit put in. I have a later model factory 4 barrel intake I plan to use in place of original 2 barrel set up and am switching to a hei distributor. The car has a 3:42 rear gear. Attached is a pic of my spec sheet for the cam. What do you guys think? Any input appreciated. Thanks for your help.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
20130113_082447.jpg (195.4 KB, 48 views)
hawks70 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 05:49 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,788
If it were me... if your just building a cruiser, a quadrajet, or you would have to adapt a squarebore carb. I'd run a 1800-2200 rpm converter. A good set of headers or just plain ol duals with stock manifolds.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 09:04 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
How much compression are you going to end up with? I hope it's at least 10:1 with that cam.

I would use a 3000 stall with that cam. Peak torque is going to be around 4000 rpm.

That cam closes the intake valve really late, causing you to lose cylinder pressure at low rpm.It is a very old design and was optimized for ch3vys. Why don't you get a more modern cam? You don't want that much exhaust duration and the LSA should be alot tighter. It will just work better.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 09:42 AM
  #4  
Hot Rod Has Been
 
krooser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 339
I would use a different cam too... or at least install that one a few degrees advanced to get the peak power down in a usable rpm range.

OK..... I stand corrected... I read the cam card sideways...

Last edited by krooser; January 14th, 2013 at 09:10 AM.
krooser is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 09:54 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
The peak hp should come in around 5000 rpm. That cam has a narrow power band.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 11:35 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hawks70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Macedon,NY
Posts: 137
Thanks for the info. Guess I should have asked more questions before I bought the cam. I guess I'll just run it with the little bit of advance.see what I think of it. Just gonna be a sunny day cruiser anyway...
hawks70 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:13 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
WTF are you guys looking at? That is just the old generic 204/214 cam. I had one in an 8 to 1 engine and it ran fine.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:41 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
Sure, it will run fine, but you'll be leaving alot of power on the table and mileage will suffer.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:44 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by analogkid455
Sure, it will run fine, but you'll be leaving alot of power on the table and mileage will suffer.
I don't get what you are saying. That is a VERY mild cam, it won't breathe at all at 5,000 and certainly does not need 10.1 compression. It would not even run on pump gas. Are you sure you are looking at the specs right? .448 and .472 lift?? 114 lobe sep
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 12:52 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
Yep. With the 280/290 duration and the wide 114 LSA the intake valve closes at 70 degrees ABDC (seat timing). Dynamic compression ratio will be 7.5:1 with 10:1 static compression.


After looking at it a little closer they grind 4 degrees advance in it and then they want you to advance it 4 more degrees, so with that installed position 9.5:1 is about as much as you want with iron heads.

At 8:1 your leaving 30 hp and 30 tq on the table.

Also your right Jim, it will peak at 4500 rpm at that point with 8 degrees of advance.

Last edited by analogkid455; January 13th, 2013 at 01:20 PM.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:20 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by analogkid455
Yep. With the 280/290 duration and the wide 114 LSA the intake valve closes at 70 degrees ABDC (seat timing). Dynamic compression ratio will be 7.5:1 with 10:1 static compression.
Erik, the duration @ .050 is 204/214, you are reading the card wrong. The 280/290 is @ .006 liftThis is the old genereric Performer cam that has been around forever. It is lazy, but has been used for years on mild 350s.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:36 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
I know, just saying, to get the most out of it, 8:1 CR will leave power on the table. What cranking pressure are you getting in yours? Do you run 87 octane?
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:41 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by analogkid455
I know, just saying, to get the most out of it, 8:1 CR will leave power on the table. What cranking pressure are you getting in yours? Do you run 87 octane?
You are dead wrong on this and I'm not goping to argue with you. You are simply mis-reading the card. I can't believe a guy with your experience did not recognize this cam right away. It is a VERY mild cam meant for stock small blocks with low compression and stock converter and gears.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:47 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Maybe this will help,
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ed...ake/oldsmobile

"Edelbrock's Performer-Plus cam and lifter kits are designed for optimum torque from the low-end to the mid-range. They feature smooth idling cams for daily drivers, trucks, vans, RVs, and 4x4s. They offer improved throttle response and torque"
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:48 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
I'm not arguing, Jim. You know me. I am not like that.

I have dealt with this cam before, also. But I guess comparing it to better cams I feel it isn't very good. The stock cam worked better for me with low compression.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:49 PM
  #16  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,788
It's basically an rv cam, I recommended 1 level over stock on the converter. It will perk his 350 up a bit and run fine with stock heads.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 01:57 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by analogkid455
I'm not arguing, Jim. You know me. I am not like that.

I have dealt with this cam before, also. But I guess comparing it to better cams I feel it isn't very good. The stock cam worked better for me with low compression.
I agree it isn't the best one out there, but to say it needs 10 to 1, a 300 stall, and that the power range is at 5000 is just plain wrong. You mis read the card.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 02:05 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
analogkid455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 38
I corrected myself and said it would peak around 4500 rpm. Depending on the rest of the combo.

I have used a 2500 stall with this cam and it was soft down low.
analogkid455 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 02:42 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
OldSchoolMuscle71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 143
so the performer cam is a decent step up from stock? will it work with 2.56's or 3.08's with stock converter?
OldSchoolMuscle71 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 02:55 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMuscle71
so the performer cam is a decent step up from stock? will it work with 2.56's or 3.08's with stock converter?
Stock is .400 and 194 @ .050, so yes, it is a step up. But, I agree with Erik that there are a lot better came out there.
captjim is offline  
Old January 13th, 2013, 03:08 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
OldSchoolMuscle71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 143
do u recommend upgrading the cam when it comes time to pull out the motor for upgrades? I figure I can do it all right the first time instead of just adding parts and hoping for more power. Its still my daily driver. So far all I have done is long tubes, H pipe, and exhaust. Hopefully pertronix, 3.08 posi, performer manifold and quadrajet or eddy 600 will wake it up and give it more pep in its step. I had the car dyno's at school and it put out 130 HP w/ 223 ft. lbs This was dont before I had the exhaust work done so those numbers reflected bone stock with a minor exhaust leak on the passenger side, single exhaust, and I dont think the carb was tuned properly (2bbl)
OldSchoolMuscle71 is offline  
Old January 14th, 2013, 08:10 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by OldSchoolMuscle71
do u recommend upgrading the cam when it comes time to pull out the motor for upgrades? I figure I can do it all right the first time instead of just adding parts and hoping for more power. Its still my daily driver. So far all I have done is long tubes, H pipe, and exhaust. Hopefully pertronix, 3.08 posi, performer manifold and quadrajet or eddy 600 will wake it up and give it more pep in its step. I had the car dyno's at school and it put out 130 HP w/ 223 ft. lbs This was dont before I had the exhaust work done so those numbers reflected bone stock with a minor exhaust leak on the passenger side, single exhaust, and I dont think the carb was tuned properly (2bbl)
You should probably start a new thread and you will get more replies.
captjim is offline  
Old January 14th, 2013, 09:12 AM
  #23  
Hot Rod Has Been
 
krooser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 339
Originally Posted by krooser
I would use a different cam too... or at least install that one a few degrees advanced to get the peak power down in a usable rpm range.

Update.... OK..... I stand corrected... I read the cam card sideways...
krooser is offline  
Old January 30th, 2013, 11:28 AM
  #24  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hawks70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Macedon,NY
Posts: 137
OK. Lots of info here. Next week I get the heads back. They did new seats, new valves, new springs cause the stockers won't work with this cam. . Also new rockers cause the old ones were pretty worn.they slightly milled the heads and have convinced me to go with either a set of Cometics or Flat Out head gaskets instead of the thicker Feel pros that came with the kit I bought. I have another question.....will the original throttle cable for the two barrel setup work with the quadrajet? Thanks......

Last edited by hawks70; January 30th, 2013 at 11:32 AM. Reason: stupid auto correct....
hawks70 is offline  
Old January 30th, 2013, 12:19 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,891
Originally Posted by hawks70
OK. Lots of info here. Next week I get the heads back. They did new seats, new valves, new springs cause the stockers won't work with this cam. ......
Yes they will, you'd just need to measure the pushrod length because of the milled heads and valve job.
And the way I read it at 4atdc that's an intake centerline of 106 or 8 degrees advanced from the get go. That cam would do better as a single pattern on a 108 in at 104. Like it is it'll probably be laaaaaazy.
And you'll have another quandry. As you advance the cam to close the intake earlier, you'll also be opening the exhaust earlier. For a low compression low rpm application that's a no-no.

Last edited by cutlassefi; January 30th, 2013 at 12:26 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old January 30th, 2013, 02:30 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Just throwing this out there but one inexpensive option (if it is still an option) is to go through Rock Auto or Advanced and get the stock 307 442 cam. I don't recall the specs but I believe it is around 204 and .440.

Edit: found it at RockAuto, $245 with chain and gears
Kit Contents Part NumberDescriptionQuantitySize ChoicesCS-651Camshaft1 HT-951Lifter16Standard OnlyKT3-498SA3Timing Set - 3 Pc.1 55-403BPrelube1

Last edited by captjim; January 30th, 2013 at 02:34 PM.
captjim is offline  
Old March 1st, 2013, 04:30 PM
  #27  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hawks70's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Macedon,NY
Posts: 137
I may just have to. Course now I'll probably have to change the valve springs and all that again too cause they were set up to run with that cam?
hawks70 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
daspin
The Newbie Forum
13
May 11th, 2015 04:37 PM
STR-8_CHARGIN
Parts Wanted
3
January 24th, 2013 05:40 PM
cutlass xombie
General Discussion
4
January 13th, 2012 02:04 PM
RAMBOW
General Discussion
7
July 26th, 2011 07:28 PM
olds_man_75455
General Questions
2
November 29th, 2009 07:19 PM



Quick Reply: looking for some advice for setup



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:34 PM.