Biggest valves in 5A heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 06:38 PM
  #1  
brownbomber77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,606
From: Bradenton, FL
Biggest valves in 5A heads

I found the article months ago but can't find it now. Olds 307 5A heads. What's the biggest valve you can stuff in there without hitting the water jacket?? My machinist says he remembers reading somewhere that 1.875 was the biggest intake and the exhaust was just fine at 1.624. Who actually knows, if anyone??? I got a guy stuffing a 403 in a G body but wants the 5A heads.


Scratch the above. It's going in a 307, real bad miscommunication. Anyway, I finally got a hold of a Mondello book....and it's true. 1.875/1.624

Last edited by brownbomber77; Dec 15, 2015 at 12:23 PM.
Old Oct 23, 2015 | 10:20 PM
  #2  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,432
From: Phoenix, AZ
5A heads on a 403? Why? They were barely adequate on the 307 engine.
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 04:08 AM
  #3  
brownbomber77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,606
From: Bradenton, FL
They're going to be ported....irrelevant. We're not looking for principle. Looking for facts here. Ha. its to look stock in a G body with a 403. So. What are the biggest valves you can stuff in a 5A head?
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 07:42 AM
  #4  
83hurstguy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,434
From: Chicago
I had 1.875/1.56 in my 307 heads with the bowls blended to the 1.875 intakes... It's been 6 years, so I can't remember much more details than that.

Dale has a cross-section head picture in his EMC thread here, you can get an idea of where the thin spots on the exhaust ports are... it's behind the guide... I'm not sure the 1.62 is going to gain you much based on that picture, that's just my .02...

http://highperformanceolds.com/phpbb....php?f=14&t=90
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 07:54 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,815
From: Northern VA
All SBO heads use the same valve center-to-center spacing as the BBO heads. That means that 2.070/1.625 valves should fit just fine. With the large 403 bores, shrouding won't be a problem. The bigger question is, can you port them enough for the 403 without hitting water? The 5A heads are from Oldsmobile's "lightweight" motors, so there is much less cast iron than in older heads. Personally, I'd start with BBO heads on a 403, since these heads worked fine on a 400 BBO. Ports are much larger to start with. Use flattop pistons to get the CR where it needs to be with the 80cc heads.
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 08:54 AM
  #6  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
I have a feeling he's trying to hide the 403 either from someone he's trying to race, or from the state EPA.
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 10:40 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,815
From: Northern VA
The big "403" on the sides of the block will likely be more of a problem than the head casting letter. Besides, Chris Witt can help with that.
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 03:36 PM
  #8  
brownbomber77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,606
From: Bradenton, FL
The primary concern is making it look like a 307. And yes, if it were an option, big block heads would be on the table first.
Old Oct 24, 2015 | 09:57 PM
  #9  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,432
From: Phoenix, AZ
As stated above, use the Chris Witt method and use BBO heads. Grind off the casting letter and make a 5A in its place using epoxy or the like to disguise them.
Old Oct 25, 2015 | 06:39 AM
  #10  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,129
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Looks like Dale used 2.02" intake and 1.56" exhaust. I have those heads stock on my 350 in my 94 4x4. They run out of steam fast, would need a lot of work to flow any decent number.
Old Oct 25, 2015 | 07:22 AM
  #11  
70cutty's Avatar
Beer Connoisseur
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,092
From: Daly City, California
I have 2.07 1.71 in my #6 heads, I don't think you can go any bigger than that.
Old Oct 25, 2015 | 08:12 AM
  #12  
brownbomber77's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,606
From: Bradenton, FL
I'll be back with how it performs. They're just going on a low mileage 403. The bottom end isn't coming out yielding the big combustion chambers with a thicker head gasket pretty weak. Thanks for the replies, and yes I saw the 2.02 valves but it appears like it is shrouded and they only installed a seat. From the cutout, it looks like it would cut into a water jacket if pushed any farther than the seat.
Old Oct 26, 2015 | 06:39 PM
  #13  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,129
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
I wonder if W31, 2"/1.625" valves would fit without issue? Hope it works out.
Old Oct 27, 2015 | 01:56 PM
  #14  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
. The bigger question is, can you port them enough for the 403 without hitting water? The 5A heads are from Oldsmobile's "lightweight" motors, so there is much less cast iron than in older heads. Personally, I'd start with BBO heads on a 403, since these heads worked fine on a 400 BBO. Ports are much larger to start with. Use flattop pistons to get the CR where it needs to be with the 80cc heads.
As is usual, Joe poses a reasonable question. In this application, the over-sized valves will grossly out flow the port, so what is the point?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
misterthews
Wheels and Tires
1
Sep 6, 2011 11:14 AM
gunmetal71
Wheels and Tires
4
Aug 17, 2010 03:54 PM
vairtom
Wheels and Tires
0
Aug 1, 2010 12:09 PM
jeffreyalman
General Discussion
8
Jan 18, 2010 04:40 PM
Pitbull2o08
442
1
Jan 16, 2008 07:38 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:40 PM.