403 Stock Intake v.s. Edelbrock 3711/2711 Performer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 31st, 2009 | 11:39 PM
  #1  
thechomp89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
403 Stock Intake v.s. Edelbrock 3711/2711 Performer

I am currently rebuilding a 403 and I'm wondering what are the performance advantages of using the Edelbrock Performer over the stock intake. I've heard that the Performer is basically a lighter copy of the Olds intake, if that's the case then the only thing I'm sacrificing is a few extra pounds.

I also plan on removing the EGR valve, would it be better to buy the Edelbrock 2711 (which offers no EGR spot) or is it just as effective to block it off on the existing manifold.

Any answers would be super duper awesome

Thanks
Old November 1st, 2009 | 05:47 AM
  #2  
70 cutlass s's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 1,489
From: KY
The Edelbrock will add about 5 to 10 HP better air flow into the engine. Also you have more choices of carbs. that you can use. If you don't plan on using a EGR than get the 2711.
For most people it is a mater of money, because they just look cool when open the hood, and any extra HP is always a plus.
Old November 1st, 2009 | 08:37 AM
  #3  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,004
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by thechomp89
I am currently rebuilding a 403 and I'm wondering what are the performance advantages of using the Edelbrock Performer over the stock intake. I've heard that the Performer is basically a lighter copy of the Olds intake, if that's the case then the only thing I'm sacrificing is a few extra pounds.

I also plan on removing the EGR valve, would it be better to buy the Edelbrock 2711 (which offers no EGR spot) or is it just as effective to block it off on the existing manifold.

Any answers would be super duper awesome

Thanks
Not sure what you're total set up is going to be but unless you have a real tall gear and low compression, I'd seriously think about the RPM. I had a regular Performer on my 350 with a 3.73 gear. Then switched to the RPM, ran better overall with no noticeable loss in low end. Plus you have more Cubic inches than I have as well.
Old November 1st, 2009 | 09:58 AM
  #4  
Eightupman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,190
From: Leasburg, NC
PM sent.
Old November 1st, 2009 | 01:11 PM
  #5  
thechomp89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
Pm replied to
Old November 1st, 2009 | 10:37 PM
  #6  
thechomp89's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5
I'm wondering would a A-4 intake from an Olds 307 fit the 403? And if it did how would the stock aluminum intake perform.
Old November 27th, 2009 | 10:35 AM
  #7  
79Birdman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by thechomp89
I'm wondering would a A-4 intake from an Olds 307 fit the 403? And if it did how would the stock aluminum intake perform.

The A4 intake will fit on the 403. you need to make sure that you get the A4 and not the A5 though, the A4 has bigger runners from what I understand. I am rebuilding the 403 in my T/A and am going to be using the A4 intake on my engine. I am doing it because I want the better flow over the stock one and the stock look. I am trying to build a sleeper so I wanted an intake that doesn't say Edelbrock or anything on it, but still has great performance.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
rcdynamic88
Parts Wanted
1
September 3rd, 2013 10:53 PM
Tony72Cutlass'S'
Small Blocks
6
July 12th, 2011 06:29 AM
agtw31
Parts For Sale
4
May 27th, 2009 08:35 AM
74omega
Parts For Sale
0
December 27th, 2008 06:02 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 AM.