403 Build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 6th, 2016, 02:13 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
403 Build

Thought I'd post this.
Been at the dyno all weekend. Did a 403 (it was given to me as a basket case) and a 455, both with iron heads, both with RPM intakes.
There have been numerous posts here asking if it's ok to use big block heads on a 403 without a loss of tq etc. Typically Joe P has stated "why not"? "Olds used those heads on a 400 big block so it only makes sense".
Well, as usual he's correct. I'll post the dyno sheet but here are the build specs;

.039 over 403, KB 6cc piston, .020 in the hole
N crank
4 main halo
Stock rods
C heads, 2.07/1.68 with just a clean up but no bowl work
221/228@.050 on a 112, in at 107 Custom Lunati Hyd Roller
5/16 one piece restricted pushrods
HS 1.6 rockers
9.0:1
QF 750 Slayer
Performer RPM intake matched to the heads
Accel HEI 30* Timing
1 3/4 Flowtech headers
Melling HV pump with purple spring

451hp@5600/512tq@3600. Run on 91 octane pump gas.

It pulled and revved great all the way thru. Stopped at 30* only because it made more power than I thought it would and it had stock rods.

Thanks Guys.

Last edited by cutlassefi; November 6th, 2016 at 02:23 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 02:22 PM
  #2  
72 Olds CS
 
RetroRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
Wow good numbers
RetroRanger is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 04:57 PM
  #3  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,337
Holy tire smoke, Batman! Very nice. About the only thing I would have done differently would have been a forged 330 crank.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 05:26 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
Pretty impressive. How'd the 455 compare? Seems to always be trash talking between the 403 and 455 fan club...
83hurstguy is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 06:56 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
Originally Posted by 83hurstguy
Pretty impressive. How'd the 455 compare? Seems to always be trash talking between the 403 and 455 fan club...
This is more why you hear about people trashing 403's. Granted this was most likely WAY overpowered to cause this type of failure.

http://www.jsmachineoldsmobile.com/403CARNAGE.html
svnt442 is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 07:16 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Question and comment

No aftermarket rods? I thought you did not use stock rods on your builds?

Regardless that is a great build. Congrats. Perfect engine for the 77-79 F body cars and the plethora of G body cars. Imagine a 79 HO or an 80 442 with that engine in place of the stock 350 yet everything bolts up as it should.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old November 6th, 2016, 07:22 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
For what's in it that's pretty impressive, good job.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 05:01 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
Thanks Trip.
Here's the dyno sheet.
Dave- you're right I don't use stock rods. But this was on a bit of a budget because the guy got screwed to begin with. Plus imo the sb rod is stronger than the bb rod, to a point.
I'll post the 455 dyno sheet over in the big block section.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
403 dyno sheet.JPG (96.4 KB, 94 views)

Last edited by cutlassefi; November 7th, 2016 at 05:19 AM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 05:39 AM
  #9  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,925
I am willing to bet that 403 made more torque considering the peak was at the start of the graph at 3400 rpm! Very nice, I will be getting you to do a custom cam for my 424ci 403 based motor down the road. Only a 4 main Halo as well, hopefully it holds up with that serious twist.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 08:33 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
ELY442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 1,945
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Thought I'd post this.
Been at the dyno all weekend. Did a 403 (it was given to me as a basket case) and a 455, both with iron heads, both with RPM intakes.
There have been numerous posts here asking if it's ok to use big block heads on a 403 without a loss of tq etc. Typically Joe P has stated "why not"? "Olds used those heads on a 400 big block so it only makes sense".
Well, as usual he's correct. I'll post the dyno sheet but here are the build specs;

.039 over 403, KB 6cc piston, .020 in the hole
N crank
4 main halo
Stock rods
C heads, 2.07/1.68 with just a clean up but no bowl work
221/228@.050 on a 112, in at 107 Custom Lunati Hyd Roller
5/16 one piece restricted pushrods
HS 1.6 rockers
9.0:1
QF 750 Slayer
Performer RPM intake matched to the heads
Accel HEI 30* Timing
1 3/4 Flowtech headers
Melling HV pump with purple spring

451hp@5600/512tq@3600. Run on 91 octane pump gas.

It pulled and revved great all the way thru. Stopped at 30* only because it made more power than I thought it would and it had stock rods.

Thanks Guys.
Just for curious, what jets and air bleeds did you have?
ELY442 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 09:51 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
GEARMAN69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 1,414
Very Nice results ! LIKE
GEARMAN69 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 10:40 AM
  #12  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,925
Just curious Mark, what is the cam lift on this motor?
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
Just curious Mark, what is the cam lift on this motor?
I believe .542. Jets were 76/84 I believe. Didn't change any air bleeds so whatever the carb came with was fine.
By the way, look at the oil pressure. Std pan, restricted pushrods. That's all you need at this level. Although you'd probably pick up a few more hp with a deep pan not filled all the way.

Last edited by cutlassefi; November 7th, 2016 at 01:49 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 02:22 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,781
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
By the way, look at the oil pressure.
I think I would need a new gauge that went 20 psi higher than what I currently have.
Fun71 is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 03:33 PM
  #15  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
Originally Posted by Fun71
I think I would need a new gauge that went 20 psi higher than what I currently have.

Lol! I use 20W-50 high zinc in everything to start with. Sometimes I change it to something lighter, sometimes I don't, depends on the clearances in the engine being dynoed.
This one could go 10W-30 in the winter, 10W-40 in the summer. Probably pick up a few hp in the process.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 04:20 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Oldcoyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 92
Lsa 112

This is VERY interesting! Thanks for posting.
Curious why you chose 112 vs say, 110.
Oldcoyote is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 04:40 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
Originally Posted by Oldcoyote
This is VERY interesting! Thanks for posting.
Curious why you chose 112 vs say, 110.
He wanted good street manners. The 112 will help that. But it also depends on the lobes being used for both the intake and exhaust. Lift was .542/.536 with 1.6 rockers.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 05:18 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Mr Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Tinley Park, IL
Posts: 817
If this build had aftermarket rods and retained the stock crank, what RPM would you comfortably pull it to?
Mr Nick is offline  
Old November 7th, 2016, 05:55 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,829
It's really not the rpm per se. It's where it makes power and how much. It also had stock rod bolts. That whole scenario just doesn't give me that warm fuzzy feeling.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old November 9th, 2016, 09:14 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
marcar1993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: CNJ
Posts: 279
Wow that's impressive!
marcar1993 is offline  
Old November 10th, 2016, 02:01 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Oldcoyote's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 92
Favorite heads?

This was obviously quite successful. Of the iron heads, which do you now prefer for the 403, big block heads or 350 small block? Or is it too soon to say.
Thanks

Last edited by Oldcoyote; November 10th, 2016 at 02:22 PM. Reason: 350
Oldcoyote is offline  
Old November 11th, 2016, 05:02 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Pete403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 12
Thanks Mark, from basket case to beast. I appreciate all the time, work and extra miles you went to make this right knowing I got screwed the first time around. I am glad I was introduced to you and you were able to fit this into your schedule and help me out. Much more HP/TQ than you originally told me and I know it was done right this time. People cannot say enough good things about you on this site and I agree.
Thanks again,
Pete
Pete403 is offline  
Old November 17th, 2016, 02:09 PM
  #23  
4 Barrels of Laughs
 
quaddriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: I moved to pittsburgh so I can be near Primantis
Posts: 405
holy crap.

I mean like wow.

I would have never believed it. it did this without the bottom end becoming a semi attached rotating mass of junk?

how much would one of these cost? it would be a nice fit in a 78 regency...be able to bark with the base hemi chargers....

question... .039 over? why such an odd size or a misprint?
quaddriver is offline  
Old November 17th, 2016, 02:18 PM
  #24  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,337
Originally Posted by quaddriver
how much would one of these cost?
You can buy this particular motor for a very reasonable price.

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...ile-403-a.html
joe_padavano is offline  
Old November 17th, 2016, 02:55 PM
  #25  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,925
Originally Posted by quaddriver
holy crap.

I mean like wow.

I would have never believed it. it did this without the bottom end becoming a semi attached rotating mass of junk?

how much would one of these cost? it would be a nice fit in a 78 regency...be able to bark with the base hemi chargers....

question... .039 over? why such an odd size or a misprint?
The .024 and .039" oversize are due matching up with 460 Ford ring sizes.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
88hurstolds
Parts For Sale
4
January 20th, 2020 11:39 AM
CMP
Major Builds & Projects
0
September 24th, 2011 10:11 PM
W403
Small Blocks
9
August 25th, 2011 12:11 PM
82ctls
Small Blocks
3
May 27th, 2011 07:25 PM
gold66
Small Blocks
17
April 27th, 2008 03:00 PM



Quick Reply: 403 Build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:46 AM.