350 rocket 1971

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 28th, 2011, 08:52 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
350 rocket 1971

Hi! I have that engine and i would like to know couple things about it: How much power it has? 7A heads, cleaned and sanded etc, headers and howard cam, 204/214 @ .050 and 750cfm qjet and olds _ 16 _ intake. ? Engine builder says 300hv and 500nm, true? Is that good engine? Mild cam? Second question: _ 16 _ intake or edelbrock performer which is better? Engine is on light a-body cutlass.

Last edited by Karpov; February 28th, 2011 at 10:04 AM.
Karpov is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 09:40 AM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by Karpov
Hi! I have that engine and i would like to know couple things about it: How much power it has? 7A heads, cleaned and sanded etc, headers and howard cam, 204/214 @ .050 and 750cfm qjet and olds 5 intake. ? Engine builder says 300hv and 500nm, true? Is that good engine? Mild cam? Second question: 5 intake or edelbrock performer which is better? Engine is on light a-body cutlass.
OK, 500 nm (about 370 ft-lb to the rest of us) is probably about right. Are the heads 7A or 7A? These are different castings. The 7A heads were used on the 1985-90 roller cam 307 motors and have tiny ports that are not conducive to building horsepower. The 7A heads were used on 1972 350s and are perfectly good small block Olds heads.

If by "5" intake you mean the aluminum A5 intake, that's not even good as a doorstop. It's designed only to match the tiny ports on the 7A heads. If you really have the 1972 7A heads, definitely get rid of it and use a Performer or Performer RPM.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 09:48 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Thanks for quick answer! Heads are 7a, 70's. Intake 5A (edit, it was 16), "OLDSMOBILE" text on top. Can i straight bolt on performer ? How about cam?

Last edited by Karpov; February 28th, 2011 at 10:05 AM.
Karpov is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 10:02 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
i remembered totally wrong. 16 intake with olds text. Thats my intake. Now whats the power?
Karpov is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 12:56 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,891
Performer or Performer RPM will bolt right on if you have 7a's.

What's the gear, tranny, stock converter? What are your intentions? Gotta know that before we recommend a cam.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 03:36 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Performer or Performer RPM will bolt right on if you have 7a's.

What's the gear, tranny, stock converter? What are your intentions? Gotta know that before we recommend a cam.
3.08, th200r4. I cant change cam, i just wanna know is my cam piece of... That engine is just rebuilted
Karpov is offline  
Old February 28th, 2011, 05:03 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,891
For your combination that cam on a tighter lobe sep would have been better but it doesn't really matter now.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 08:09 AM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
okay! How about 16 intake? Is it good or not?
Karpov is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 01:18 PM
  #9  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Torque number is probably wrong. I've had my 71 350 (has # 7 heads) on the dyno once, after installing the Edelbrock (Phoney) Power Package. Highest TQ #s at the rear wheel was 260.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 01:24 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by 71 Cutlass
Torque number is probably wrong. I've had my 71 350 (has # 7 heads) on the dyno once, after installing the Edelbrock (Phoney) Power Package. Highest TQ #s at the rear wheel was 260.
How about hp on your engine?
Karpov is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 01:40 PM
  #11  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
At the rear wheels...sad...218.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 02:05 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by 71 Cutlass
At the rear wheels...sad...218.
Ouch! Is that same power package serie who promises 1500$ +400hv in many engine but without edel heads? what is your guess hp and tq on crankshaft etc?
Karpov is offline  
Old March 1st, 2011, 02:19 PM
  #13  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
It was the 397 HP Power Package from many years ago. As far as guessing HP & TQ, add the usual losses of 15-20 percent.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old March 2nd, 2011, 07:46 AM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
how about the 16 intake? Do i keep it or buy edelbrock?
Karpov is offline  
Old March 2nd, 2011, 09:07 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Aceshigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,202
Originally Posted by 71 Cutlass
Torque number is probably wrong. I've had my 71 350 (has # 7 heads) on the dyno once, after installing the Edelbrock (Phoney) Power Package. Highest TQ #s at the rear wheel was 260.
Are you serious ??
I wonder what the hell is in my 1970 350's rebuild then.
I dyno'd out at ~240hp/325ft lbs @ the wheels.

Only thing I know is I have an RPM intake, #6 heads,
updated valvetrain, and a 750cfm edelbrock that's
dumping too much fuel in. But no idea what cam.

Last edited by Aceshigh; March 2nd, 2011 at 09:11 PM.
Aceshigh is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2011, 04:51 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
You have to remember not all dynos are created equal.
380 Racer is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2011, 05:12 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
71supreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Portland Maine
Posts: 362
"You have to remember not all dynos are created equal." x2...

There is a great article on this in last months Hot Rod magazine!

I am not familiar with the 16 intake. Is it an Olds factory production piece? Is it cast Iron, or Aluminum?

From your references to hv and nm, I am guessing you are not in the states, correct? Where in the world are you?
71supreme is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2011, 10:30 AM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by 71supreme
"You have to remember not all dynos are created equal." x2...

There is a great article on this in last months Hot Rod magazine!

I am not familiar with the 16 intake. Is it an Olds factory production piece? Is it cast Iron, or Aluminum?

From your references to hv and nm, I am guessing you are not in the states, correct? Where in the world are you?
Heh. My scrappy language reweals me better than units that i use Am i right? Im from finland. Gasoline pays allmost 2$ liter, heh. 16 intake was 74-77 4V i think, alu maybe? There is egr.
Karpov is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2011, 04:44 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
71supreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Portland Maine
Posts: 362
hehe, your lanquage is fine, and better than many Americans! I will be so glad when gas settles down! Ugh!

If your intake is aluminum, keep it. There aren't many options for Olds 350 intakes, and the biggest advantage seems to be the weight savings versus cast iron.

Opinions on the EGR vary, and i don't know much about them. my 71 doesn't have egr. If the car it's going in is a 71, you can block that space with a simple plate. Many places sell them.
71supreme is offline  
Old March 3rd, 2011, 11:12 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Karpov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by 71supreme
hehe, your lanquage is fine, and better than many Americans! I will be so glad when gas settles down! Ugh!

If your intake is aluminum, keep it. There aren't many options for Olds 350 intakes, and the biggest advantage seems to be the weight savings versus cast iron.

Opinions on the EGR vary, and i don't know much about them. my 71 doesn't have egr. If the car it's going in is a 71, you can block that space with a simple plate. Many places sell them.
Egr is plated! How much gallon pays now in states?
Karpov is offline  
Old March 4th, 2011, 04:32 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
71supreme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: South Portland Maine
Posts: 362
"Egr is plated!" - excellent

Fueling up here in Maine is between 3.25 and 3.75 per gallon (close to $1 per litre) Doestnt sound too bad to you I'm sure, but we are used to something closer to $2.50 per gallon, and it seems headed to $4.00 if things don't settle down in the mid-east.
71supreme is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BlueBeast
Small Blocks
1
August 20th, 2015 07:28 AM
Zrzoun
General Discussion
32
July 28th, 2015 11:59 AM
Olds442redberet
Parts For Sale
0
September 6th, 2014 06:24 PM
BigTrav
Small Blocks
17
December 3rd, 2012 05:24 AM
68ragtop
Parts For Sale
0
March 1st, 2009 08:54 AM



Quick Reply: 350 rocket 1971



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 AM.