330 Carb Replacement
#1
330 Carb Replacement
Rebuilding the 330 for the 65 F-85 and am about to get it back from the machine shop to put back together. I am now looking at carburetor recommendations.
Everything is being put back to factory, as much as possible, down to the cams, heads and intake but looking for a little more performance than the original Rochester 4 BBL had. Bolt on would be nice but probably not likely.
My buddy is recommending the Holly Street Avenger 570. I've seen threads on this forum that in general say go with QJet.
Recommendations?
Everything is being put back to factory, as much as possible, down to the cams, heads and intake but looking for a little more performance than the original Rochester 4 BBL had. Bolt on would be nice but probably not likely.
My buddy is recommending the Holly Street Avenger 570. I've seen threads on this forum that in general say go with QJet.
Recommendations?
Last edited by 1965F85_scholten; April 3rd, 2013 at 04:59 PM.
#2
A good running Q-Jet is hard to beat streetwise. The Holley 570 - 600 cfm is a good choice if originality does not matter as well as the Edlebrock 600 cfm is a good choice. Q-Jet and Edlebrock for the street and Holley for Street/Strip would be my opinion.
#3
My .02... If you were looking for increased performance, the time for that was during the rebuild process. Your best performance carb is the rochester for the stock setup. Any other carb will require an adapter or a manifold change and the performance increase is negligable.
#5
Why would you "put everything back to factory" and then try to gain more power by avoiding the QuadraJet, which should be able to provide all the power you need for a 330?
I second OldCutlass - If you really wanted more power, there are things you could have done during the rebuild that might have made a different carb. advantageous.
At this point, I doubt you could gain anything by using a different carb., though you could lose driveability or fuel mileage.
- Eric
I second OldCutlass - If you really wanted more power, there are things you could have done during the rebuild that might have made a different carb. advantageous.
At this point, I doubt you could gain anything by using a different carb., though you could lose driveability or fuel mileage.
- Eric
#6
Why would you "put everything back to factory" and then try to gain more power by avoiding the QuadraJet, which should be able to provide all the power you need for a 330?
I second OldCutlass - If you really wanted more power, there are things you could have done during the rebuild that might have made a different carb. advantageous.
At this point, I doubt you could gain anything by using a different carb., though you could lose driveability or fuel mileage.
- Eric
I second OldCutlass - If you really wanted more power, there are things you could have done during the rebuild that might have made a different carb. advantageous.
At this point, I doubt you could gain anything by using a different carb., though you could lose driveability or fuel mileage.
- Eric
#7
Like I said, the best all around performance your going to get out of the stock engine will be with the quadrajet. Most any other carb, with a stock manifold will require a spreadbore to squarebore adapter or a manifold change.
I would concentrate and spend my money on good flowing exaust system, gears, transmission, etc...
I would concentrate and spend my money on good flowing exaust system, gears, transmission, etc...
Last edited by oldcutlass; April 3rd, 2013 at 11:25 PM.
#8
Let's back up. If this 1965 330 has the original intake, it's a square bore intake set up for the 4GC carb. This is the one time I'd advocate an E-brock carb over a Qjet. The E-brock bolts on to the stock intake and will run well right out of the box. 600 CFM is probably all you need if everything else is stock.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
#9
Let's back up. If this 1965 330 has the original intake, it's a square bore intake set up for the 4GC carb. This is the one time I'd advocate an E-brock carb over a Qjet. The E-brock bolts on to the stock intake and will run well right out of the box. 600 CFM is probably all you need if everything else is stock.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
Crap, my apologies, yes the the 65 was a square bore.
![Embarrassment](https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums/images/smilies/redface.gif)
#10
He's got a 4-Jet (4GC). Only Chebby had the QJ in '65.
... And there are a number of aftermarket carbs which would work better than the original.
- Eric
#12
Thanks for all the great information. I really don't want to have to rebuild the 4GC. It's a piece of crap. I'll take a look at the after-market carbs. Perhaps Edelbrock. I'd rather not replace the air cleaner to after market, since the whole point was to keep everything factory as much as possible.
#13
#14
Yeah, looking around. Not finding any yet. Too bad I can't go with an adapter ring. They make them for 4 7/32 inlet to 5 1/8 air cleaner opening. Not the other way around which is what I will need.
#15
What about going with a newer factory intake (67 maybe) and Q jet that would look closer to original? I have a Q jet from a 330 but not sure if i have an intake with the divorced choke. Just a thought.
#17
I have a 66-67 air cleaner base 5 1/8 hole 17 3/4 overall diameter. That should be the same as yours. Can't say if it will clear the Ebrock choke but it might.
If you want it give me a few bucks for shipping and I will send it to you. I live in Id. so the shipping wouldn't be much.
If you want it give me a few bucks for shipping and I will send it to you. I live in Id. so the shipping wouldn't be much.
#19
I have a 66-67 air cleaner base 5 1/8 hole 17 3/4 overall diameter. That should be the same as yours. Can't say if it will clear the Ebrock choke but it might.
If you want it give me a few bucks for shipping and I will send it to you. I live in Id. so the shipping wouldn't be much.
If you want it give me a few bucks for shipping and I will send it to you. I live in Id. so the shipping wouldn't be much.
#21
More to the point, why replace your Qjet? The original carb will be "best" for a stock engine. If you have modified the engine, we need to know what was done to provide useful suggestions.
#22
Just asking you wizards cause I don't know......
#23
carb
Everyone has an opinion on carbs. I just recently (advice from someone on this forum) purchased and installed a QuickFuel 600 slayer for my 65 330 f85 and it works and responds (in my opinion) better than the Edlebrock that was on the car.
ted
ted
#24
Part store reman Qjets should be avoided, send your original to someone like Everyday Performance. Either the Quickfuel mentioned above or the Street Demon 625, second one will bolt to your manifold but might need a spacer to clear the manifold being a 3 barrel carb.
#27
As Joe said earlier in the thread,
Do you have a QuadraJet or a 4-Jet?
- Eric
Let's back up. If this 1965 330 has the original intake, it's a square bore intake set up for the 4GC carb. This is the one time I'd advocate an E-brock carb over a Qjet. The E-brock bolts on to the stock intake and will run well right out of the box. 600 CFM is probably all you need if everything else is stock.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
Edit: Be aware that the original air cleaner will not fit ANY replacement carb other than another 4GC. The 4GC has a smaller air horn than the 5 1/4" that's now standard on most 4bbls. You'll either need an aftermarket unit or a 1966 base that has the larger opening for the Qjet.
- Eric
#28
I'll also point out that the 66-67 Qjets with the cup-style lower well plugs are the only ones that have a high probability of leaking down into the engine. It is very possible that this is the problem. I suggest finding a Qjet rebuilder who has a clue, as apparently the one who rebuilt this carb the last time did not. Of course, you got exactly what you paid for.
#30
The OP from 2013 had a 65 with a 4GC. The current problem is on a 67 330. That poster resurrected the earlier thread, demostrating once again why that is a bad idea, since it leads to confusion such as this.
I'll also point out that the 66-67 Qjets with the cup-style lower well plugs are the only ones that have a high probability of leaking down into the engine. It is very possible that this is the problem. I suggest finding a Qjet rebuilder who has a clue, as apparently the one who rebuilt this carb the last time did not. Of course, you got exactly what you paid for.
I'll also point out that the 66-67 Qjets with the cup-style lower well plugs are the only ones that have a high probability of leaking down into the engine. It is very possible that this is the problem. I suggest finding a Qjet rebuilder who has a clue, as apparently the one who rebuilt this carb the last time did not. Of course, you got exactly what you paid for.
#31
The 4 barrels weren't engaging before the rebuild. And still are not. The accelerator pump is sticking now yet was not before. My hopes were only to get a little direction either for sticking with the Q-jet culture , which I have been frustrated. Or moving on to a newer ( I mean new not rebuilt ) carb technology with as good or better performance than what I have. That's all I was asking....I was not aware of a similar thread that was started but will be more aware next time. Thank You
What does "sticking" mean on the accelerator pump? Are you saying that it goes down in the bore then doesn't come back up? Or are you talking about a flat spot in acceleration, which could also be caused by improper adjustment of the secondary air valves?
I'm not trying to be critical here, but without precise information, it is not possible to perform long-distance diagnosis.
#32
How do you know that the 4 barrels aren't "engaging"? The secondaries on a Qjet are mechanically operated and open when the throttle is moved. If you are looking at the secondary air valves on TOP of the carb while revving the engine in PARK, they will NOT open. They are designed to only open as needed under load, and there is no load in neutral. There is a wrap spring that controls the rate of air valve opening that must be adjusted properly during a rebuild. There is also a dashpot that controls the rate of opening. The diaphragm in these goes bad over time. Did your free rebuild check these items?
What does "sticking" mean on the accelerator pump? Are you saying that it goes down in the bore then doesn't come back up? Or are you talking about a flat spot in acceleration, which could also be caused by improper adjustment of the secondary air valves?
I'm not trying to be critical here, but without precise information, it is not possible to perform long-distance diagnosis.
What does "sticking" mean on the accelerator pump? Are you saying that it goes down in the bore then doesn't come back up? Or are you talking about a flat spot in acceleration, which could also be caused by improper adjustment of the secondary air valves?
I'm not trying to be critical here, but without precise information, it is not possible to perform long-distance diagnosis.
Instead of a clean take off on a harder acceleration it instantly bogs down as if being robbed of gas. After the instant bog down it takes off again. I bought the rebuild kit from carburetors.com and a respectable retired mechanic offered his free services because of his love for classics. Whether he did it correctly or not I am not sure. He did tell me that the carb was worn out and that he replaced everything that came with the kit. Thank you for having patience...
#33
I should have mentioned that the 4 barrels did not and will not engage under load. That is if " under load " means stomping on the gas petal at any speed from 20 to 65 ( stomping hard ) In the morning when I go to start , the gas pedal feels stuck ( thus the sticking ) putting more pressure then unsticks it . When manually observing this action I see and feel the pump sticking then dropping down with much physical pressure( either by hand or foot
Instead of a clean take off on a harder acceleration it instantly bogs down as if being robbed of gas. After the instant bog down it takes off again. I bought the rebuild kit from carburetors.com and a respectable retired mechanic offered his free services because of his love for classics. Whether he did it correctly or not I am not sure. He did tell me that the carb was worn out and that he replaced everything that came with the kit. Thank you for having patience...
Instead of a clean take off on a harder acceleration it instantly bogs down as if being robbed of gas. After the instant bog down it takes off again. I bought the rebuild kit from carburetors.com and a respectable retired mechanic offered his free services because of his love for classics. Whether he did it correctly or not I am not sure. He did tell me that the carb was worn out and that he replaced everything that came with the kit. Thank you for having patience...
The basic carb does not "wear out". The biggest wear problem on a QJet is the bushings for the throttle shafts. As they wear, they cause a vacuum leak. Bushing replacement kits are available. The other potential problem is corrosion, which can be caused by ethanol in today's gasoline.
#34
What you have is a bad bog, and IF it's caused by the carb (there are other possible causes, like timing), then there are really two most likely causes. Either the accelerator pump is not adjusted properly or the secondary air valves are opening too quickly. If the problem is the secondary air valves, that can either be caused by an incorrect air valve wrap adjustment or a bad diaphragm, as I pointed out above. All of these are easy adjustments on the carb (or replacement if the diaphragm is bad). As for the carb being "worn out", well, you're SUPPOSED to use all the parts that come in the rebuild kit. That's kinda why you paid for them.
The basic carb does not "wear out". The biggest wear problem on a QJet is the bushings for the throttle shafts. As they wear, they cause a vacuum leak. Bushing replacement kits are available. The other potential problem is corrosion, which can be caused by ethanol in today's gasoline.
The basic carb does not "wear out". The biggest wear problem on a QJet is the bushings for the throttle shafts. As they wear, they cause a vacuum leak. Bushing replacement kits are available. The other potential problem is corrosion, which can be caused by ethanol in today's gasoline.
#35
It's unlikely that the pump is causing this problem. Try disconnecting the linkage at the carb and actuating the lever on the carb by hand. If it still is sticky, it's in the carb. If not, it's in the linkage.
#36
Thanks
#37
I will just interject that I have never heard of a QuadraJet accelerator pump physically sticking or catching.
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
#38
I will just interject that I have never heard of a QuadraJet accelerator pump physically sticking or catching.
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
![EEK!](https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums/images/smilies/eek.gif)
#39
I will just interject that I have never heard of a QuadraJet accelerator pump physically sticking or catching.
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
It's easy enough to press the accelerator pump plunger down with a screwdriver or similar tool and see whether it is catching or rough, and whether it pumps a smooth stream of fuel from the nozzles.
- Eric
I may just try a new pump first before investing in a new carb.....
#40
The carb. has to come apart and the plunger and bore have to be inspected.
The tolerances for the plunger and bore are very forgiving, and I would highly doubt that this is a problem of the wrong part.
- Eric
The tolerances for the plunger and bore are very forgiving, and I would highly doubt that this is a problem of the wrong part.
- Eric