1970 California Cutlass 350 question.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 1st, 2014, 12:27 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
1970 California Cutlass 350 question.

Hey Guys, been looking for another car for a while here on the site and locally, bought one last week. It appears to be a completely unmolested car as far as the body and majority of the engine is concerned. Car is powered by a Rocket 350. Now remember this was/is a California car, manufactured in the Fremont plant and all the emissions control equipment seems to be there and functioning. Since the car will never need smog i want to improve performance by removing/plugging the "smog" systemwhere possible. Now the car has a Performer manifold and a Holley 600 cfm carb with part #40480 stamped on it, I assume these were not factory options and were aftermarket installed? The car has the original Air Cleaner set up and a small "air cannister" in the front passenger side with three vacumn lines, two of which which lead up to a "T" that is threaded to a threaded intake manifold plug etc, etc. What is the cleanest, easiest way to bypass and clean up the system and maybe gain a little more performance? Thanks for all input.

Last edited by Fummins; June 1st, 2014 at 12:34 PM.
Fummins is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 12:35 PM
  #2  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,269
Originally Posted by Fummins
Hey Guys, been looking for another car for a while here on the site and locally, bought one last week. It appears to be a completely unmolested car as far as the body and majority of the engine is concerned. Car is powered by a Rocket 350. Now remember this was/is a California car, manufactured in the Fremont plant and all the emissions control equipment seems to be there and functioning. Since the car will never need smog i want to improve performance by removing/plugging the "smog" systemwhere possible. Now the car has a Performer manifold and a Holley 600 cfm carb with part #40480 stamped on it, I assume these were not factory options and were aftermarket installed? The car has a small "air cannister" in the front passenger side with three vacumn lines, two of which which lead up to a "T" that is threaded to a threaded intake manifold plug etc, etc. What is the cleanest, easiest way to bypass allmthis mess? Thanks for all input.
Before you start ripping stuff out, you might want to understand what it does and how it affects the car.

The canister you mention is the evaporative emissions canister. It simply recovers gasoline vapors that would otherwise be vented to the atmosphere and returns them to the carb to be burned. Not exactly detrimental to the car or your wallet.

The only other piece of emissions equipment on your car is Transmission Controlled Spark (TCS). This is a system that disables distributor vacuum advance in all gears except high (third if you have an AT). TCS is supposed to reduce NOx emissions. Personally I'd bypass it and simply connect the distributor to manifold vacuum.

There are no other emissions systems on the car to speak of.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 12:59 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Thanks Joe, nothing removed yet, thats why I posted here first. Learned that lesson a long time ago lol. So your opinion is that a California car vs a Non California car of the same year and equipment would perform the same?
Fummins is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 01:11 PM
  #4  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,269
Originally Posted by Fummins
Thanks Joe, nothing removed yet, thats why I posted here first. Learned that lesson a long time ago lol. So your opinion is that a California car vs a Non California car of the same year and equipment would perform the same?
In 1970, the only difference between a CA car and a 49 state car was the evaporative emissions canister, which has no effect on performance. The TCS was used on all cars that year.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 02:54 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
In 1970, the only difference between a CA car and a 49 state car was the evaporative emissions canister, which has no effect on performance. The TCS was used on all cars that year.
Thanks Joe, much appreciated.
Fummins is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 04:58 PM
  #6  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,071
Congrats on your purchase.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 05:23 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Congrats on your purchase.
Thanks Eric, shes a dandy and clean as I have ever found one. Twilight Blue with old school Cragar SS wheels, kinda makes me giddy looking at her lol
Fummins is offline  
Old June 1st, 2014, 08:01 PM
  #8  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,071
You know the drill by now...pictures.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2014, 01:53 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
You know the drill by now...pictures.
Well since you asked....lol
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
cut 1.jpg (52.7 KB, 50 views)
File Type: jpg
cut2.jpg (52.8 KB, 45 views)
File Type: jpg
cut3.jpg (37.6 KB, 41 views)
Fummins is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2014, 02:38 PM
  #10  
Oldsmobile enthusiast
 
s i 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 689
That looks like a fun one to drive and tinker with.
s i 442 is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2014, 04:40 PM
  #11  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Originally Posted by s i 442
That looks like a fun one to drive and tinker with.
It is so far.....lol
Fummins is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2014, 05:37 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Redog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 3,145
Nice looking car
Redog is offline  
Old June 3rd, 2014, 08:16 PM
  #13  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,071
Very nice!
oldcutlass is offline  
Old June 4th, 2014, 03:26 AM
  #14  
car nut farmer
 
71rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SE KS
Posts: 596
Pretty car. Looks good with those Cragers.
71rocket is offline  
Old June 4th, 2014, 03:59 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
BLUE72RAGTOP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 117
Good score. I like it!
BLUE72RAGTOP is offline  
Old June 5th, 2014, 05:14 PM
  #16  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Fummins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Northern California
Posts: 133
Thanks Guys, been freshening the motor up, she just keeps running better! Of course I had a BB 4 spd in my last Cutlass so it takes a little getting used to lol
Fummins is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldspackrat
General Discussion
11
April 2nd, 2014 10:28 PM
VinMichael
Parts For Sale
2
February 21st, 2013 08:27 PM
leepear
General Discussion
6
July 11th, 2011 12:08 PM
pcard
Cars For Sale
0
July 8th, 2011 11:38 AM
Taz
Cars For Sale
11
June 18th, 2008 03:26 AM



Quick Reply: 1970 California Cutlass 350 question.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:32 PM.