When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Dynamic compression and online calculators explained
And why to avoid them.
it’s been a sexxy topic over the last few years to brag about your DCR knowledge online or talk about it like it’s been a secret recently discovered.
the fact is you’ll get five different DCR numbers using five different calculators. The biggest reason is the intake valve closing point used in them is mostly just a wild guess.
the only accurate ones to use are the ones that use valve on seat numbers… not an advertised#, not .050”, not .006” or an unknown, which most calculators use.
they’ll just say “intake closing ABDC”. Which means nothing unless the valve is seated. Most will add an arbitrary number to the .050” closing point , which also assumes every lobe ramp in the world has the exact same actual valve on seat closing from the .050” down
some arbitrarily add 15 degrees to the closing number within the program, some say add 20, some don’t say anything, but add it without you even knowing how much they’ve added in the program. That’s why you get all kinds of different DCR answers using different calculators
but let’s say you find a good one that actually uses valve closed timing and you get an accurate DCR number…what does it mean to you? The truth is, not much. The internet experts will say things like “oh I always shoot for a max 8.5 DCR for pump gas”. Or some other whacked out answer. what does 8.5 mean,, or 7.5, or 8.25478453?
they don’t take into account the fuel used, conditions, engine set up, combustion chamber design and its burn characteristics or resistance to detonate. Is it a bad wedge style chamber? Hemi or a very good compact small bore ?
you’ll never hear a pro engine builder talk about his DCR. If they do , it’s for a very specific combo that they have done many times and know what it can tolerate. That means nothing to any other engine build
You are not the first person to question these dynamic compression calculators. Same complaint on how they decide on the numbers and is it really accurate. I do like their non dynamic compression ratio calculator. Having the gasket bore in the equation does change the actual compression ratio somewhat.
You are not the first person to question these dynamic compression calculators. Same complaint on how they decide on the numbers and is it really accurate. I do like their non dynamic compression ratio calculator. Having the gasket bore in the equation does change the actual compression ratio somewhat.
most online static comp calculators don’t include a crevice volume input. That is usually anywhere from .6 cc to 2cc depending on the crevice to wall clearance with a .250” down dimension. Pistons with huge valve reliefs will usually have a much deeper top ring down distance which adds cc’s
stock cast pistons are about .025” smaller than the bore while forged 2618’s can be .045”
Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; Nov 9, 2023 at 02:12 PM.
Good question. Mark would know that. On this iron head motor, a .1 to 1 drop should not change it enough to cause issues.
It all adds up. That 10.2 valve relief is more like 11.2 + when calculated right.
that’s why I got a lower number than you guys when I calculated it.
what Mark should do is talk to Mahle about making that piston available with no reliefs at all. It’s a machined relief, so it’s easy to eliminate that step. It’s a 4032 material piston,, 99% of the guys wanting that material don’t need any reliefs
the old TRW/Speedpro flat tops for the 350 didn’t have any valve reliefs…anyone using those pieces of **** never had a problem with valve to piston clearance.they were similar tight fitting like the 4032’s
Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; Nov 10, 2023 at 01:20 PM.
Mark, I'm not too worried about it. The motor is together, basically need to throw on accessories, fluids, prime oil, fire and break in the cam. Slightly under 9.5, should be around 9.4 to 1. If it is only 9.3 to 1, won't mean enough to notice.
It all adds up. That 10.2 valve relief is more like 11.2 + when calculated right.
that’s why I got a lower number than you guys when I calculated it.
what Mark should do is talk to Mahle about making that piston available with no reliefs at all. It’s a machined relief, so it’s easy to eliminate that step. It’s a 4032 material piston,, 99% of the guys wanting that material don’t need any reliefs
the old TRW/Speedpro flat tops for the 350 didn’t have any valve reliefs…anyone using those pieces of **** never had a problem with valve to piston clearance.they were similar tight fitting like the 4032’s
Isn't that a small block chevy valve relief pattern ?