455 overbore limits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old December 13th, 2015, 09:40 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
shiftbyear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: So. Ca.
Posts: 651
455 overbore limits

What is the largest overbore possible on a 455 olds block? I've heard people say the cylinder walls are .300" thick. Has anyone sonic tested a standard bore 455?
shiftbyear is offline  
Old December 13th, 2015, 09:51 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by shiftbyear
What is the largest overbore possible on a 455 olds block? I've heard people say the cylinder walls are .300" thick. Has anyone sonic tested a standard bore 455?
It is my understand .125 is max if you sonic test. This maybe be wrong but i think i heard that somewhere. I doubt if there is enough wall thickness left with out hard block with .125 bore.JMO
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 13th, 2015, 12:15 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,828
Well that may be true on the thrust sides, but unless you come across a block used for a pump etc I have yet to sonic check one that has more than .180-.190 wall thickness front to back. It doesn't matter how thick the thrust sides are, you have to maintain at least .090-.100 thickness at its thinnest point. Otherwise you'll sacrifice ring seal and longevity.

Last edited by cutlassefi; December 13th, 2015 at 12:18 PM.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old December 13th, 2015, 02:55 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Well that may be true on the thrust sides, but unless you come across a block used for a pump etc I have yet to sonic check one that has more than .180-.190 wall thickness front to back. It doesn't matter how thick the thrust sides are, you have to maintain at least .090-.100 thickness at its thinnest point. Otherwise you'll sacrifice ring seal and longevity.
No reason to doubt anything in your post and very good info. I know i haven't any reason yet to go more than .06.Thanks for putting your info out there Mark.
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 13th, 2015, 09:50 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
oldsfromyell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 94
I have sonic checked all the 455 blocks I have. They all are thinnest in the 3o'clock and 9o'clock positions. They are all fairly close to each other in wall thickness. They all measure in the .180-.190 range on non thrust and upper .200 to close to .300 on the thrust. Can't remember exact thrust thickness but was thick enough was not concerned. My DX I am building measured at its thinnest .204 non thrust. Standard bore. It is now bored to 4.155 so it still has some room for at least one more bore. Always measure a block it is cheap insurance.
oldsfromyell is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 06:52 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,311
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
you have to maintain at least .090-.100 thickness at its thinnest point. Otherwise you'll sacrifice ring seal and longevity.
Mark,

Any comments on using a block filler?
joe_padavano is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 11:25 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,828
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Mark,

Any comments on using a block filler?

Yes, it will increase your oil temps due to the loss of cooling via the bottom of the cylinder. And there's no guarantee the thinnest spots will be at the bottom. Even though it'll stabilize the whole cylinder to some degree imo you're better of not doing that unless absolutely necessary.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 11:58 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Yes, it will increase your oil temps due to the loss of cooling via the bottom of the cylinder. And there's no guarantee the thinnest spots will be at the bottom. Even though it'll stabilize the whole cylinder to some degree imo you're better of not doing that unless absolutely necessary.
So these guys using block filler in a race engine application shouldn't at any bore size because of oil temps. I thought with this block filler a guy goes to a system where the oil is filtered external and cooled before returned. So to keep oil temps down.
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 01:14 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,828
hard to understand that post Neeley.
But I'm guessing you're questioning about oil temps on race engines? If so it's normally not a problem, they normally don't run long enough.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 01:32 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
hard to understand that post Neeley.
But I'm guessing you're questioning about oil temps on race engines? If so it's normally not a problem, they normally don't run long enough.
Well Mark i guess you are being sarcastic! Could you point out which part of my post was hard to understand? The post i made was about a racing engine!You were suggesting not to do this block filler at a max bore.So what are you saying a street motor? To never use block filler unless necessary in a street platform. At one time on ROP there were a few street cars using block filler to the water pump holes. Now you are saying block filler on a race engine is fine? I am just trying to understand!
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 02:37 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
455 block overbore

Originally Posted by shiftbyear
What is the largest overbore possible on a 455 olds block? I've heard people say the cylinder walls are .300" thick. Has anyone sonic tested a standard bore 455?
The largest overbore possible varies from block to block. Sonic checking is your friend & must be done prior to boring. Consult with an experienced Olds specific engine builder prior to deciding on your final bore. Also carefully weigh the pros & cons of big overbore for your application.


Now, since Mark takes pleasure in accusing me of being vague and muddying the water, I will specifically answer the original question.


My 524 BBO uses a 4.280" bore. That is 0.155" over standard bore. I am not aware of any 455 build that uses a bigger bore than 4.280". Perhaps one of the engine builders does but I do not.


I AM NOT TELLING YOU THAT YOU CAN DO THIS TO ANY GIVEN 455 BLOCK BECAUSE YOU CAN'T.


I DO NOT ADVOCATE OR RECOMMEND THAT YOU TRY TO REPLICATE A 4.280" BORE ON A 455 BLOCK.


I hope I answered your question and also hope I haven't offended some others by providing that answer.......


Oh....and Mark.....have a nice day.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 02:50 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
507 olds says his old block was block filled just below water pump holes!
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 05:04 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,828
You can use block fill in anything, it'll raise oil temps that's all. That's all I said, plain and simple.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 05:20 PM
  #14  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
You can use block fill in anything, it'll raise oil temps that's all. That's all I said, plain and simple.
Brian 507 told me he used a stand alone exterior filter and a cooler. He was one i was referring to as a street car but there are others. You also said it was hard to understand my post.I ask you to explain!
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 05:25 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Mark,

Any comments on using a block filler?
Joe do you have any?I would like to hear your take on this.
wr1970 is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 05:34 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,828
Originally Posted by wr1970
So these guys using block filler in a race engine application shouldn't at any bore size because of oil temps.
"Shouldn't at any bore size" Don't understand that.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old December 14th, 2015, 06:02 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
wr1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,574
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
"Shouldn't at any bore size" Don't understand that.
Mark i thought anything over a .06 sonic test and if you block fill it would be more than a 468 ci. Were you digging bug crap out just to be sarcastic? Do you see a need for block filler at 468 ci or less?
wr1970 is offline  
Old January 5th, 2016, 11:05 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
madmax442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Barre,VT
Posts: 621
I'll answer for Mark........nope!
madmax442 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
oldsonharmont
Big Blocks
15
March 14th, 2014 09:47 PM
Chesrown 67 OAI
General Discussion
2
March 27th, 2013 09:32 AM
oddball
Small Blocks
1
October 24th, 2011 08:43 AM
Gunfreak25
Transmission
8
January 26th, 2011 06:08 PM
Jetstarjockey
Small Blocks
4
May 24th, 2006 02:12 PM



Quick Reply: 455 overbore limits



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:35 AM.