Toro Oil Pan?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 09:37 AM
  #1  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Toro Oil Pan?

Anyone have one for sale? They have an additional 1 qt capacity. I think I still have the factory crank scrapers but need the pan. Thanks j.blusnavage@att.net
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:22 AM
  #2  
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,515
From: South River, New Jersey
for what it is worth...

Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Anyone have one for sale? They have an additional 1 qt capacity. I think I still have the factory crank scrapers but need the pan. Thanks j.blusnavage@att.net

I too was looking for a toro pan because of the extra quart capacity and stock looks then I read this posting
http://people.ucalgary.ca/~csimpson/Tech/Toropan.html

what I went with is a "stock" oil pan from MILODON #30765 which holds 5 qts plus filter, ( it doesn't say it on the site, but I called and confirmed this and after it was installed 6 qts filled my engine and the correct level on the dip stick)

the pan is very well made and looks virtually stock.
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:28 AM
  #3  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Nice info, I will prob go that route.
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 10:46 AM
  #4  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
Better would be to take the Toro pan, cut out the hump or flatten it with a piece of pipe and a hammer after heating with a rosebud tip on an acetylene torch, add front and rear baffles. Best would be to start with a Toro pan to get the scraper, bend it to get enough but not too much clearance to the crank and rods, weld on a new sump and baffles to increase capacity. Toro depth is same as the milodon 7 qt pan; 8 qt is an inch lower and an inch below the crossmember at the same time. I like the scraper, but the easiest is the Milodon pan and if you plan on the high volume Melling 22HV oil pump you should get at least 7 qt capacity, particularly if over 5000 rpm is to be seen.
Old Jun 24, 2010 | 01:15 PM
  #5  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,225
From: Edmond, OK
I have a Milodon pan on my 455 and it works great. Don't waste time and money on the Moroso pan.
Old Jul 23, 2010 | 07:29 PM
  #6  
hamm36's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 651
From: Dallas
I have a Toro Pan with the square windage try, deeper pick up tube, and two main bolts (Mon-dumbo) said would work for the tray. And the hump has been worked out. That was the way I got it. All I did was clean it up, and paint it. I went stock with my build, so I used the stock pan. PM me if interested.

Last edited by hamm36; Dec 30, 2010 at 08:05 PM.
Old Jul 25, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #7  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Thanks for the offer but I too have decided to go the stock route on my 67 project after thinking things thru.
Old Jul 27, 2010 | 04:45 AM
  #8  
507OLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,814
From: Erie,PA
The Toro pan does not live up to the hype.You need to get the oil away from the crank.The tighter belly area does the exact opposite.This has been proven on a few different engines,on a dyno,with ONLY the oil pan swap.Each engine made more power without the Toro pan.Anywhere from 7HP to 15HP.The higher-winding engines will benefit more without one.Use a stock style pan,or an aftermarket Moroso or Milidon pan,if you want more capacity.Both of these aftermarket pans have the same belly shape as the stock pan.They just have a deeper sump with some baffles in the sump area.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bob Kelso
Parts For Sale
1
Apr 9, 2012 01:17 PM
longboardguy
General Questions
0
Jul 1, 2009 09:57 PM
FixinIt
Parts Wanted
2
May 19, 2008 05:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:34 PM.