The Newbie Forum The place where you should introduce yourself. Do not ask technical questions here, use the site forum sections.

1967 genuine 442 or a Clone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:25 AM
  #1  
sslider02's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 1
From: Fort Collins, CO
1967 genuine 442 or a Clone?

Hi There, I was winning bidder on a 442, and I am planning on picking it up on Friday 8/22, so I look forward to learning more about the cars and people on this site soon. However I am now thinking that perhaps this is a clone. any opinions/feedback is much appreciated! (at minimum it appears the dash may be from a prior year with a 2 speed tranny because the tranny indicator shows DL instead of DSL?) Thank you! Brent
http://www.ebay.com/itm/390906643655...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:36 AM
  #2  
allyolds68's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 5,507
From: Seneca Falls, NY
I think this is what the 67 experts are going to want to look at:


Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:42 AM
  #3  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
I'd like to see which "numbers" "match."

Did they provide any documentation whatsoever that this is an original car? (None is mentioned in the listing).

Rough values of 1967 Cutlass Supreme convertibles in pretty condition,
without 4-4-2 package: $10-14,000 and
with 4-4-2 package: $25-35,000

Welcome to ClassicOlds.

- Eric
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:48 AM
  #4  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Being a Fremont built car, the body tag will not document it as a 442. The seller claims twice that it has the original engine, misidentified as the L69 which is the Tri-Carb motor. The seller should be asked for proof of this. Of course this should have been asked before the purchase. The POP would contain proof the car was a 442 and the pretty much that the engine is original. Or not.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by MDchanic
I'd like to see which "numbers" "match."
Took the words right out of my mouth. Once again, Oldsmobile didn't start stamping the block and trans with a VIN derivative until the 1968 model year, so there are NO numbers that "match" on a 67.

There are, however, many more things in this ad that scream "danger Will Robinson"...

Originally Posted by ebay seller speed.sports
This Oldsmobile has the matching correct L69 V8 with a 3 speed Turbo-Hydramatic transmission. The L69 was rated at 350 hp and 440tq from the 400CI engine.
Uh, no. The L69 was the 1966-only 3x2 bbl setup. It was NOT available from the factory in the 1967 model year, so I am struggling to understand how this is "matching correct." Do you see any "L69" RPO code in the 1967 SPECS booklet:



Now, 350 HP was the factory rating for the L78 442 option engine:



The dash also bothers me. The TH400 was only available on a real 442 in 1967. Lesser Cutlii got the two speed Jetaway. Was the dash on this car changed, or the engine and trans?

Naturally, this car has every option known to mankind. How many were added during the restoration (or cloning), and how well was the work done.

And finally, I got a real kick out of this:

Only 103117 miles
and this:

The Cutlass 442 is with equipped with luxury like options
"Luxury LIKE"?????

As noted, only the cowl tag can prove the reality of the car - assuming it isn't a Fremont car, at which point you're on your own.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:59 AM
  #6  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by wmachine
Being a Fremont built car, the body tag will not document it as a 442. The seller claims twice that it has the original engine, misidentified as the L69 which is the Tri-Carb motor. The seller should be asked for proof of this. Of course this should have been asked before the purchase. The POP would contain proof the car was a 442 and the pretty much that the engine is original. Or not.

I notice the heads do not have provisions for smog plumbing and being a Fremont car I would think they should at least be drilled, tapped and plugged?????????????

Good looking car anyway.

Henry
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:03 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 66400
I notice the heads do not have provisions for smog plumbing and being a Fremont car I would think they should at least be drilled, tapped and plugged?????????????
A.I.R. was only required on cars sold in the state of CA. Fremont built cars sold in other western states, which did not require A.I.R.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:10 AM
  #8  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Has any money changed hands yet?

- Eric
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:13 AM
  #9  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
A.I.R. was only required on cars sold in the state of CA. Fremont built cars sold in other western states, which did not require A.I.R.

In 1966 Fremont assembled cars for out of state deliveries do have drilled, tapped and plugged heads and and also received the tall oil filler tube. I have 3 Fremont 66's that are so equipped. I'm just not sure about the 67 model year.

Henry
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
For some reason, the first time I opened the ebay ad, I didn't get all the photos to load, so now I've seen the cowl tag (NATURALLY it's a Fremont car...) and the black plates. Of course, if the car was delivered to, say NV, then brought back to CA in 1968, it would still have gotten black plates, so jury is out on the lack of A.I.R.

Note also that the crank and water pump pulleys have three grooves, but only two are being used. And clearly the engine has been rebuilt at some point, given how shiny the freeze plugs are.

Other points are the late model 12SI alternator and the red junction block on the LH inner fender (that looks like the one in my 93 Allante). Of course, the big 442 emblem on the radio delete plate isn't factory, either (and both the emblem and the delete plate are available as repros).

It's a nice looking car, however.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:17 AM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 66400
In 1966 Fremont assembled cars for out of state deliveries do have drilled, tapped and plugged heads and and also received the tall oil filler tube. I have 3 Fremont 66's that are so equipped. I'm just not sure about the 67 model year.

Henry
Didn't know that, thanks.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 09:31 AM
  #12  
DJS70cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 317
From: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Has any money changed hands yet?

- Eric
I'm not sure.....but it sounds like the deal is done.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 10:31 AM
  #13  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Took the words right out of my mouth. Once again, Oldsmobile didn't start stamping the block and trans with a VIN derivative until the 1968 model year, so there are NO numbers that "match" on a 67.
Though there is still plenty to question on this car, there *are* engine numbers to match in '67. On the POP is the engine unit number. The V2xxxxxG series is unique to the 442, also. So the POP would be able to verify a 442 *and* a "numbers matching" engine if someone is inclined to use that totally oblique term. Sure it means for certain only the head where the number is, but the VIN on the block means only the block is. But there is a number to match to something in '67.
My money is the seller not having a clue, as are most that use the term "Numbers matching". To me when someone uses that term, it means "I don't know".
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 11:03 AM
  #14  
hurst68olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,580
From: Las Vegas, NV
FWIW: my Fremont built Feb. '67 Cutlass Supreme , delivered NEW to Las Vegas, NV 330 4bbl has drilled/tapped/plugged heads.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 11:59 AM
  #15  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,799
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wmachine
Though there is still plenty to question on this car, there *are* engine numbers to match in '67. On the POP is the engine unit number. The V2xxxxxG series is unique to the 442, also. So the POP would be able to verify a 442 *and* a "numbers matching" engine if someone is inclined to use that totally oblique term. Sure it means for certain only the head where the number is, but the VIN on the block means only the block is. But there is a number to match to something in '67.
My money is the seller not having a clue, as are most that use the term "Numbers matching". To me when someone uses that term, it means "I don't know".
Agreed, but I don't see a P-O-P anywhere in all those photos.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 03:55 PM
  #16  
lemoldsnut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,345
From: Redmond, Oregon
I have had several Fremont cars some with and some without drilled heads. So, not sure that is all true. Some of which were veryifed original cars.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 05:38 PM
  #17  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
It does have the fuel return line and it is not an AC car, it has the Turbo 400 trans. I am leaning toward a real 442. If no $$ exchanged hands yet I would think twice and see if more concrete proof can be had. I would never trash the PRNDSL for a mint PRNDL dash bezel.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 05:56 PM
  #18  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Ok, the bulb just went on. Someone installed the Rally Pack and could not find the correct shift bezel so installed the PRNDL one. My 67 TC had this same setup and I am sure it is a realTC with 400 Eblock and Turbo 400 trans.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 07:57 PM
  #19  
hurst68olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,580
From: Las Vegas, NV
based on what's shown in the auction:
At a minimum it's a Cutlass Supreme 330 4bbl Jetaway convertible in triple-black
Next possibility is Cutlass Supreme 400 2bbl TH400 "turnpike cruiser" convertible in triple-black
Top of the heap it's a Cutlass Supreme 400 4bbl TH400 "442" convertible in triple black

? extra belt groove on crank & water pump pulleys would drive air-pump
?? picture of the engine before rebuild shows the correct curved air-pump oil fill tube
??? head date shown is 104 (Friday, 4/14) or 204 (Sunday, 7/23) if it's a '67 calendar year head, neither is correct for the car, maybe the drilled heads went away a long time ago

things to check:
casting date on block
code & date on the TH400
rear axle w/sway bar & boxed control arms - What's the code on the axle?
dates on exhaust manifolds

The price the auction ended at seems appropriate for a "clone" & a steal if an authentic 442!
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:03 PM
  #20  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,025
The PRNDSL "dial" is attached to the chromed plastic bezel, so it could be kept even if the bezel were changed.
Old Aug 17, 2014 | 08:06 PM
  #21  
hurst68olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,580
From: Las Vegas, NV
besides the WHEELS the SHIFT INDICATOR and the poorly placed 442 EMBLEM on the radio delete plate (is that an original or reproduction with the sink spots where the screw bosses are?) - there are no "red flags" ..... does that make it an authentic 442 or a clone?

is that a 390390 intake & is there a date on them?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
danlf4
Cars For Sale
1
Nov 1, 2014 06:12 PM
txrob779
Cutlass
83
Feb 10, 2014 04:49 PM
pbarney
Cars For Sale
0
Dec 29, 2013 12:20 PM
jeffreyalman
Parts For Sale
0
Jan 26, 2013 08:17 AM
<Newbie>
Big Blocks
1
Jan 3, 2005 04:47 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:33 AM.