General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

64 Old Engine & Transmission ID

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 01:34 PM
  #1  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
64 Old Engine & Transmission ID

Hello friends, Here's an Oldsmobile trivia question for you. I have a friend in Slovakia who is nuts for old American cars and trucks and he's fortunate to have enough money to indulge in his hobby.

He has a 64 Olds Delta 88 convertible that has transmission troubles. He bought a rebuild kit, but I guess his Slovakian mechanic didn't do the job right. Anyway, he wants me to buy him a rebuilt transmission here and ship it to him there.

The problem is that neither he nor I know what kind of transmission he has. I've taken a photo of both the engine and transmission. I hope that one of you guys can identify it. Please let me know.

By the way, I am personally restoring a 71 Vista Cruiser. I plan to post the project and I'm sure I'll have some questions for you guys as time goes on.

Thanks,
Kurt Lammon
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
64-Olds-88.jpg (54.4 KB, 33 views)
File Type: jpg
transmission-64-Olds.jpg (54.5 KB, 37 views)
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 04:12 PM
  #2  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,192
From: southeastern Michigan
First of all, he can't have a 1964 Delta 88 as there is no such thing. The Delta name was first used by Oldsmobile in 1965. If he's been going around telling people he needs a transmission for a '64 Delta 88, maybe that's why he's been having trouble finding one.


He more likely has a Dynamic or Super 88. The automatic transmission on the full-size (except Jetstar 88) 1964 Oldsmobiles was the Hydramatic.

Last edited by jaunty75; Oct 21, 2010 at 05:15 PM.
Old Oct 21, 2010 | 05:16 PM
  #3  
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
"me somebody" site member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Sorry, Jaunty, I was able to quote your orignal (see below) before you could correct it. Stick to spell-check, haw haw!


Originally Posted by jaunty75
He more likely has a Dynamic 88.
I must conclude that the car is a Super 88, based on the Starfire pie plate (assuming its correct), as the Starfire engine was option in the Super but not the Dynamic in 1964.

Originally Posted by jaunty75
The standard-equipment automatic transmission on the full-size (except Jetstar 88) 1964 Oldsmobiles was the Hydramatic.
I do not believe an automatic transmission was "standard equipment" on the Super or the Dynamic. Being that its an auto, the original equipment transmission would be the roto-hydramatic, also known as the "slim-jim" (the term "hydramatic" is frankly a bit too vague).
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 05:33 AM
  #4  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
Thanks for info

I'm sure you guys are right about the model designation. The main thing is what kind of transmission is it? According to information I found on Wikipedia, it says: "The Super Turbine 300 (Jetaway) was introduced for the 1964 model year as a replacement for the earlier Buick Dynaflow and Oldsmobile/Pontiac Roto Hydramatic transmissions. It was the only automatic offered on GM A platform cars (Buick Skylark, Oldsmobile Cutlass, and Pontiac Tempest) through 1966, and was available on the full-sized Buick LeSabre and Oldsmobile Jetstar 88/Delmont 88 as a cheaper alternative to the three-speed Turbo-Hydramatic "

So the way I read this, there are three possible transmissions for the 64 "Dynamic 88"? Can you guys tell the type based on the photo of the pan?

Thanks, Kurt
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 05:43 AM
  #5  
jaunty75's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 15,192
From: southeastern Michigan
Originally Posted by kurtlammon
and was available on the full-sized Buick LeSabre and Oldsmobile Jetstar 88/Delmont 88 as a cheaper alternative to the three-speed Turbo-Hydramatic "

So the way I read this, there are three possible transmissions for the 64 "Dynamic 88"? Can you guys tell the type based on the photo of the pan?
I don't think this is correct. I owned a '64 Jetstar 88 for five years back in the '90s, and I had all the manuals and sales literature. In all the time I owned the car and was working on it, I never came across anything that said that anything other than the two-speed Jetaway was available for that car if you wanted an automatic transmission. The three-speed Hydramatic was not available on the Jetstar 88. It WAS available on the Jetstar I, which was a sort of a down-scale version of the Starfire and offered for, I think two years ('64 and '65).

Remember, Wikipedia isn't perfect, and I think it's mistaken in this case.


On the other side of that coin, the two-speed Jetaway was NOT available on the other full-size '64 Oldsmobiles. It was a Cutlass/F-85 transmission, and it was available on the full-size Jetstar 88 only because the Jetstar 88 was the low-cost, full-size Oldsmobile that year and was able to be "low-cost" because it used the Cutlass/F-85 engine, drivetrain, and brakes.
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 10:06 AM
  #6  
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
"me somebody" site member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Originally Posted by jaunty75
I don't think this is correct. I owned a '64 Jetstar 88 for five years back in the '90s, and I had all the manuals and sales literature. In all the time I owned the car and was working on it, I never came across anything that said that anything other than the two-speed Jetaway was available for that car if you wanted an automatic transmission. The three-speed Hydramatic was not available on the Jetstar 88. It WAS available on the Jetstar I, which was a sort of a down-scale version of the Starfire and offered for, I think two years ('64 and '65).

Remember, Wikipedia isn't perfect, and I think it's mistaken in this case.


On the other side of that coin, the two-speed Jetaway was NOT available on the other full-size '64 Oldsmobiles. It was a Cutlass/F-85 transmission, and it was available on the full-size Jetstar 88 only because the Jetstar 88 was the low-cost, full-size Oldsmobile that year and was able to be "low-cost" because it used the Cutlass/F-85 engine, drivetrain, and brakes.
kurtlammon, the ROTO-Hydramatic transmission (nicknamed "slim jim") that is in your friend's car is a FOUR speed (though some will insist that its stirctly a three speed, with a variable vane torque multiplier in the fluid coupling) automatic transmission. It should not be confused with the Turbo-Hydramatic offered starting in 1965, or the 2 speed Jetaway available in the Jetstar 88s. Based on the shape of the pan that would have to go on that trans, it sure looks like the 4 speed Roto-Matic ("slim jim") that would ave come in the car from the factory.

I don't blame you for wanting to know for sure; hopefully someone else with some person experience with these cars/transmisisons will chime in and confirm what I've said.
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 11:40 AM
  #7  
chequenman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
From: north of Toronto and quite a bit West!!!
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by kurtlammon
Hello friends, Here's an Oldsmobile trivia question for you. I have a friend in Slovakia who is nuts for old American cars and trucks and he's fortunate to have enough money to indulge in his hobby.

He has a 64 Olds Delta 88 convertible that has transmission troubles. He bought a rebuild kit, but I guess his Slovakian mechanic didn't do the job right. Anyway, he wants me to buy him a rebuilt transmission here and ship it to him there.

The problem is that neither he nor I know what kind of transmission he has. I've taken a photo of both the engine and transmission. I hope that one of you guys can identify it. Please let me know.

By the way, I am personally restoring a 71 Vista Cruiser. I plan to post the project and I'm sure I'll have some questions for you guys as time goes on.

Thanks,
Kurt Lammon


Hi Kurt; What your friend has for a Transmission is a Roto 10 Hydramatic. Full rebuild parts and or reseal kits, including "NEW" Damper plates can be purchased and shipped anywhere in the World from www.fatsco.com. They are I believe on the east coast of the United States.
Your friends picture of the engine compartment is also a "394" and sure looks good being an Air car as well. Nice detailing! Good Luck....
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 01:17 PM
  #8  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
Thanks again for the expert info, guys. I called Fatsco, but they don't have any rebuilt trannys, just rebuild kits. Since he's already tried to rebuild it once, I don't want to lead him down that path if it's not necessary.

Is there anybody who makes a kit to mate a more modern TH-350 to the old 394 block? Perhaps it'll mate right up, I don't know. If that could be done, then all he'd need is a new driveshaft possibly.

-Kurt
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 01:43 PM
  #9  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
I just pulled up a WEALTH of info on 442.com on transmissions. It seems like the TH-350 or TH-400 should bolt right up. Anybody else have any experience with a swap?
-Kurt

Here's the link: http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/oftrn.htm
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 03:00 PM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by kurtlammon
I just pulled up a WEALTH of info on 442.com on transmissions. It seems like the TH-350 or TH-400 should bolt right up.
FYI, information there is even less reliable than from Wikipedia...

At least Wikipedia can be updated when mistakes are found.
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 03:25 PM
  #11  
chequenman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
From: north of Toronto and quite a bit West!!!
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
FYI, information there is even less reliable than from Wikipedia...

At least Wikipedia can be updated when mistakes are found.

X's 2
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 03:33 PM
  #12  
chequenman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 514
From: north of Toronto and quite a bit West!!!
Question All Original!!!

The original type slim jim trans might prove the best route to go at the end of the spending. CW[/quote]


Like Coldwar says it'll probably be a better car leaving it stock with the original Tranny and the fact it's an Air Car with an original motor will increase it's resale value later!!!
Old Oct 22, 2010 | 04:30 PM
  #13  
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
"me somebody" site member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
PM Sent; ..I know a older local gentleman here in central NJ who has a fondness for the '63 big cars; just called him and he does have a few spare transmissions. I presume that a '63 trans would work; perhaps someone here can verify.

Last edited by aliensatemybuick; Oct 22, 2010 at 04:33 PM.
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 05:34 AM
  #14  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
Thanks a ton Coldwar and Aliens... Sounds like a pretty big task to make the TH400 conversion. Aliens, can you give me the contact info for your friend with the Slim Jims available? If I can get one and have it rebuilt by someone who knows what they're doing, that would be the best way to go, especially considering the resale value. It is a nice looking car... might as well keep it original if possible. (Also, any suggestions on a good transmission shop familiar with Roto-Hydramatics?)
Thanks, Kurt
Old Oct 25, 2010 | 05:36 AM
  #15  
kurtlammon's Avatar
Thread Starter
1971 Vista Cruiser
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 35
From: Chattanooga, TN
Coldwar, I will contact the place in Chicago today. Thanks a lot for the suggestion.
-Kurt
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sid
Transmission
9
Jan 25, 2015 12:59 PM
860kirk
Parts For Sale
5
Apr 30, 2012 05:31 PM
76 vette
Parts For Sale
2
Aug 10, 2009 05:39 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:42 PM.