General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

Rear posi not working anymore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:22 PM
  #1  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Rear posi not working anymore

I have a 1972 Cutlass. It says cutlass on the back but the VIN coder said it is a f85. It has a factory posi rear with a factory 4-speed hurst shifter on the floor. The posi worked fine then it stopped working. Then sometimes it worked and other times it didn't. Well now its not working at all. Is this a simple fix as in a bolt that fell out or do I need a whole new rear. Thank you.
Old Sep 13, 2010 | 10:54 PM
  #2  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,489
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Well it won't be a bolt that fell out. You may need the rear rebuilt, but try this first. Drain the old gear lube out by removing the differential cover, then refill with fresh 80/90w gear lube AND a bottle of anti slip additive. If you are lucky this may cure it.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,832
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by kjr2492
I have a 1972 Cutlass. It says cutlass on the back but the VIN coder said it is a f85.
Yeah, Olds did that in the 1972 model year. The bottom-of-the-line A-bodies carried the "F-85" VIN but were badged as Cutlass on the 2dr cars.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 07:06 AM
  #4  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by kjr2492
I have a 1972 Cutlass. It says cutlass on the back but the VIN coder said it is a f85.
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Yeah, Olds did that in the 1972 model year. The bottom-of-the-line A-bodies carried the "F-85" VIN but were badged as Cutlass on the 2dr cars.
Huh? In '72 the only F85 model was the D69 F85 Town Sedan. No 2-dr F85s that I know of! (8 models carried the Cutlass name)
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 07:12 AM
  #5  
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
Land Yacht Captain
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,727
From: Shelburne, Ontario
Isn't that what Joe said? The base 2 door was labeled as a Cutlass but the VIN indicated an F85.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 07:19 AM
  #6  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by 66ninetyeightls
Isn't that what Joe said? The base 2 door was labeled as a Cutlass but the VIN indicated an F85.
No. The base F85 was a *4-dr* only (The Town Sedan is a 4-dr). Everything else (that means all 2-drs) were Cutlass models.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 08:52 AM
  #7  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Oldsmobile's are confusing. There is no F85 badges on the car at all. There never was, we are the original owners with 47,000 miles on the car and all build sheets. Whats rare I think is the bench seat that my grandad ordered with the 4 speed on the floor. It has the 350 rocket with 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 09:15 AM
  #8  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by kjr2492
Oldsmobile's are confusing. There is no F85 badges on the car at all. There never was, we are the original owners with 47,000 miles on the car and all build sheets. Whats rare I think is the bench seat that my grandad ordered with the 4 speed on the floor. It has the 350 rocket with 4 barrel carb and dual exhaust
I think the only thing confusing so far is that your "VIN coder" gave you bad (wrong) information. You do *not* have an F85. Period.
It you post your VIN, I'll tell you exactly what Cutlass model you have.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #9  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,832
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wmachine
Huh? In '72 the only F85 model was the D69 F85 Town Sedan. No 2-dr F85s that I know of! (8 models carried the Cutlass name)
Kurt is correct, the "F" code for series in 1972 referred to "Cutlass H.T." according to the VIN Cards issued by GM Service:

http://service.gm.com/dealerworld/vi.../vincard72.pdf

The four door only F-85 carried a VIN code "D" that year. Having said that, I've got $10 that says the Fisher Body Tag on this car carries a 3287 body code, and the "F-85" four door that year carries a 3269 body code.

Other Cutlii that year (with the "G" code in the VIN) carried 36xx body codes.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:44 PM
  #10  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
Anywho ... regardless of the nameplate on your car, you can try putting new lube in the rear, but you probably need to have the posi rebuilt. There are clutch packs in there which wear out. Find a competent local shop that knows how to set up a rear end.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 03:52 PM
  #11  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,030
From the 11/72 parts book:
1972 OLDSMOBILE MODELS
F85 STANDARD
Four Door Sedan, 3269, D69
Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87

CUTLASS
S.W. 2-seat 3636,G36
Four Door Sedan, 3669, G69
"S" Club Coupe, 3677, G77
"S" Hardtop Coupe, 3687, G87

CUTLASS SUPREME
Hardtop Sedan, 4239, J39
Hardtop Coupe, 4257, J57
Convertible, 4267, J67

Last edited by Run to Rund; Sep 14, 2010 at 03:57 PM.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #12  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
From the 11/72 parts book:
1972 OLDSMOBILE MODELS
F85 STANDARD
Four Door Sedan, 3269, D69
Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87
You're quite right, Joe the '72 Parts books do show the Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87 as an F85 model.
But that is wrong. The Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87 is definitely a Cutlass model.
They had that corrected in the parts books by the time the June '74 edition came out.
Old Sep 14, 2010 | 06:24 PM
  #13  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,832
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wmachine
You're quite right, Joe...
Could you forward that to my ex-wives?

...the '72 Parts books do show the Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87 as an F85 model.
But that is wrong. The Hardtop Coupe, 3287, F87 is definitely a Cutlass model.
They had that corrected in the parts books by the time the June '74 edition came out.
Actually, my point was that in prior years, the 31xx and 32xx cars were typically F-85s and 35xx/36xx cars were typically Cutlii. Olds scrambled that in 1971 and later years, but the 31xx/32xx cars were usually the low-end trim cars. Of course, there were no six cylinder cars offered in the 1972 model year, so there were no 31xx or 35xx cars that year anyway.
Old Sep 15, 2010 | 11:49 PM
  #14  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Ok. I'm going to post the VIN on here. Then maybe I will know what it is. My Grandmother is looking for all the original build sheets when they ordered the car.
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 04:27 AM
  #15  
507OLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,814
From: Erie,PA
The posi unit can be rebuilt,if it is the clutch style.I have seen some,very few,71-72 10-bolt posis,from Cutlass/442's that had a cone style posi unit,like the earlier 8.2's had.These are NOT rebuildable,and if this is what you have,you can swap that unit for another posi unit.
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 07:47 AM
  #16  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,832
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by kjr2492
Ok. I'm going to post the VIN on here. Then maybe I will know what it is. My Grandmother is looking for all the original build sheets when they ordered the car.
Anyone care to bet that it starts out 3F87xxxx?

Post the cowl data plate info also.
Old Sep 16, 2010 | 03:13 PM
  #17  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Ok The VIN is 3F87M2G130261. What does everything mean. Thank you.
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 06:06 AM
  #18  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
And it has a 2 barrel carb. on it. I dont know why I thought a 4.
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 07:11 AM
  #19  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,832
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by kjr2492
Ok The VIN is 3F87M2G130261. What does everything mean. Thank you.
3 = Oldsmobile Division
F = Cutlass H.T. (see discussion below)
87 = Holiday Coupe (2dr Hardtop)
M = 350 4bbl dual exhaust 200HP net
2 = 1972 model year
G = Framingham, MA assembly plant
130261 = sequential build number

As we discussed at the beginning of this thread, the "F" code in 1972 was called a Cutlass and badged that way, but it carried a 3287 body code, which would have been an F-85 in other years. The four door F-85 from 1972 also carried a 3269 body code. The 32xx cars were typically F-85s, with the low-end trim. It's also notable that Olds differentiated the 3287 body with a VIN code F vs. other Cutlii (the 36xx body code cars) that carried a VIN code G.

Now, 1972 was an oddball year because the Colonnade-styled cars that came out in 1973 were originally scheduled for release in the 1972 model year, and a strike at GM caused the delay to 1973. As a result, the 1971 cars received a very minor restyle and were called 1972 cars. Many of the previously available options and features were not available in 1972 (for example there was no six cylinder engine available in 1972). The 1972 model year will always be an anomaly.
Old Sep 17, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #20  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
3 = Oldsmobile Division
F = Cutlass H.T. (see discussion below)
87 = Holiday Coupe (2dr Hardtop)
M = 350 4bbl dual exhaust 200HP net
2 = 1972 model year
G = Framingham, MA assembly plant
130261 = sequential build number

As we discussed at the beginning of this thread, the "F" code in 1972 was called a Cutlass and badged that way, but it carried a 3287 body code, which would have been an F-85 in other years. The four door F-85 from 1972 also carried a 3269 body code. The 32xx cars were typically F-85s, with the low-end trim. It's also notable that Olds differentiated the 3287 body with a VIN code F vs. other Cutlii (the 36xx body code cars) that carried a VIN code G.

Now, 1972 was an oddball year because the Colonnade-styled cars that came out in 1973 were originally scheduled for release in the 1972 model year, and a strike at GM caused the delay to 1973. As a result, the 1971 cars received a very minor restyle and were called 1972 cars. Many of the previously available options and features were not available in 1972 (for example there was no six cylinder engine available in 1972). The 1972 model year will always be an anomaly.
Thank you very much. It does have a 4 barrel. The carb looks small to me, not like one of these Holley's. I should be getting pics this weekend. My parents are bringing the car over to "Past the tourch" I guess you can call it. Where could I find out how many cars were produced with the bench seat, posi etc? Is there any way of knowing?
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 07:15 AM
  #21  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
[QUOTE=kjr2492;208206Where could I find out how many cars were produced with the bench seat, posi etc? Is there any way of knowing?[/QUOTE]

Not much for most years, but for '72 i can give you figures for particular options on not a specific model, but series. But only singular options, not combinations.
What options do you want to see the numbers for?
Old Sep 19, 2010 | 05:30 PM
  #22  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by wmachine
Not much for most years, but for '72 i can give you figures for particular options on not a specific model, but series. But only singular options, not combinations.
What options do you want to see the numbers for?

I was curious about the bench seat. I thought that most cars came with bucket seats if they had a 4-speed. I know my grandfather ordered it like that so all the kids could ride in the car.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 10:17 AM
  #23  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Okay, I have some good new for you, in that your car is pretty rare. I have some production figures that usually won't be this specific, but because of the quirky nature of the model numbers in '72, we can be real specific.
There were only about 92 of your 3287 Cutlass model that came with the 4-spd (M20 close ratio, to be specific). How many of them were bench seat? All of them! All 3287 Cutlass model were bench seats, buckets were not an option. (This is actually just a carry-over thing as previously all F85s did not have a bench seat option either)

I say "about" 92, because 83 were made though June, and July's production is unknown and 92 would be an averaged figure.
Old Sep 20, 2010 | 12:56 PM
  #24  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by wmachine
Okay, I have some good new for you, in that your car is pretty rare. I have some production figures that usually won't be this specific, but because of the quirky nature of the model numbers in '72, we can be real specific.
There were only about 92 of your 3287 Cutlass model that came with the 4-spd (M20 close ratio, to be specific). How many of them were bench seat? All of them! All 3287 Cutlass model were bench seats, buckets were not an option. (This is actually just a carry-over thing as previously all F85s did not have a bench seat option either)

I say "about" 92, because 83 were made though June, and July's production is unknown and 92 would be an averaged figure.
Thank you the good news. Where could I find all the very detailed information? Thanks again
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 06:52 AM
  #25  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
You found it........I have it!
It comes from the GM Heritage Center records. I copied them from there when I went there to research the records.
Old Sep 21, 2010 | 08:59 PM
  #26  
kjr2492's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 11
Originally Posted by wmachine
You found it........I have it!
It comes from the GM Heritage Center records. I copied them from there when I went there to research the records.

LOL. Oh ok. Well thank you again.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tedd Thompson
Site Help
16
Jul 10, 2014 01:38 PM
L77F85
General Discussion
10
Jan 1, 2014 06:01 PM
import extermination
General Questions
1
Oct 31, 2011 10:36 AM
Jamesbo
The Clubhouse
25
Feb 1, 2010 07:21 PM
HARDLUCK88
Small Blocks
107
Sep 27, 2009 03:57 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:52 PM.