General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

Gas leaking from fuel tank vent tube?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:54 AM
  #1  
bgoble's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Gas leaking from fuel tank vent tube?

Here's the deal. When I make a left hand turn you can see a trail of gasoline on the road in a perfect arc that matches the turn. I was wondering if the possibyly the vent hose came off of the passenger side tank vent allowing this to happen.

Also do you need to drop the tank to get to the vent hoses that are on the tank?

Any help will be appreciated.

1972 Cutlass S 350

Last edited by bgoble; Mar 24, 2010 at 08:18 AM.
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #2  
1964f-85's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 198
From: Massillon, Ohio
Is the tank vented on a 71/72?
My 64 the vent is on the back of the tank, passenger side and is easy to reach.
I was having similar problems with mine, I ended up putting a vented gas cap on it and all is well.
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 12:58 PM
  #3  
lshlsh2's Avatar
71 cutlass convertible
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,170
From: Trappe, MD
I had the same problem on a 71 cutlass. I have 3 vent tubes left right and center. There is a small piece of fuel line between the tank and the steel tubing of the vent. I did drop the tank but you don't have to. I wanted to check the top of the tank for rust and other possible problems. I would change all of the rubber fuel lines at the same time. They are probably all orginal and with rubber fuel lines at 40 years is not a good thing.
Larry
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 04:06 PM
  #4  
bcracing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 75
I just had the same problem with my 71 a month ago, It was a 3" long piece of rubber hose for the gas tank vent on the frnt passenger side of the tank. Replaced it along with all the other rubber lines back at the tank, cured the problem, and got rid of the gas smell I had been smelling
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 06:05 PM
  #5  
bgoble's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Thanks for the info. I was hoping it would be a simple fix and the tank would not have to be dropped. This is my first project car and sometimes it feels like 2 steps forward and one step back. I replaced the hoses that connect to the standpipe assembly a few months ago and i didn't know there were more hoses or I would have replaced them at the same time. Thanks for the info, I will update this post once I replace the hoses.
Old Mar 24, 2010 | 07:26 PM
  #6  
rcorrigan5's Avatar
Randy C.
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,348
From: Albany, OR
If you gas tank is anything like my '68 or '69 4-4-2s, you don't have to drop the tank to get to those vent hoses. However, it would be ideal to put your car up on a lift so you can see up in there to work. I know I can get to those vent hoses on my cars (2 of them on the upper front passenger side of the tank) when the car is on a lift.

Randy C.
Old Mar 31, 2010 | 05:42 PM
  #7  
bgoble's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Well I got it fixed. 3" of 5/16" fuel line and about an hour of labor. Pulled the right rear wheel for easier access and replaced everything I could reach.
Old Apr 11, 2010 | 08:31 AM
  #8  
coltsneckbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 735
From: Colts Neck, NJ
That vent is a strange and I think somewhat dangerous setup that GM made. If you get a fill-up then whenever you stop the gas will slosh forward and likely some will squirt out the short hoses that were used. My tank has 2 vents there and both short (6") hoses go into a Y-shaped plastic thing. The plastic tube is supposed to have a small filter in it to prevent kicked up dirt from falling back into the tank.

I am guessing that the reason for the 2 vent holes was (in anticipation of regulations) to take the gas fumes (which in fact I do smell also) that evaporate into a capture apparatus as most cars by the 80s were mandated to have.

While not strictly original for my car I have been thinking about installing one of those vapor capture canisters simply for saftey and evnviromental concerns.
Old Apr 14, 2010 | 03:09 PM
  #9  
BlackGold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,587
From: West Michigan
Those two vent tubes sticking out of the front of the tank end up in different places inside the tank. One ends just inside, the other runs diagonally to the opposite corner. Both tubes are pinched shut inside the tank, but not sealed tightly. Both tubes are supposed to stay above the fuel on level ground. When the car is at an angle, the design ensures that at least one tube stays above the fuel. This means that the tank will always be vented, and no fuel will be forced out as the temperature rises. Whatever small amount of fuel is able to slosh through the pinched tube when braking will gather in the plastic "surge" thingy, then drain back into the tank.

That's the description of how it's supposed to all work. I have heard numerous stories of some reproduction tanks in which one or both tubes inside the tank are below the fuel level, which guarantees there will be times fuel is forced out when it expands.
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 07:00 AM
  #10  
bgoble's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 66
Brian:
You are correct in your assessment. It turned out to be the main 5/16" fuel hose and not one of the vent tube hoses. All of the hoses have now been replaced so I should be ok for a while.
Old Apr 15, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #11  
coltsneckbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 735
From: Colts Neck, NJ
Brian,
Interesting. Could it be that if the tank is just topped off too high that is why I got a very minor about of dripping?

Also, no matter how the tubes run inside the tank one still get the aroma of gas as fumes will waft out!!
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 11:22 AM
  #12  
tarheeldoc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 50
From: Elizabeth City, North Carolina
Any idea where to get that plastic "thingy" that the two hoses run into? I recently discovered the same gas leak after filling up, and found that piece was broken. Or if anyone has an idea for what makes a good substitute?

Thanks,
Ken
69 Cutlass S
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 02:26 PM
  #13  
ROCKET VAPOR's Avatar
Lance
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 757
From: YUKON, OK.
Originally Posted by tarheeldoc
Any idea where to get that plastic "thingy" that the two hoses run into? I recently discovered the same gas leak after filling up, and found that piece was broken. Or if anyone has an idea for what makes a good substitute?

Thanks,
Ken
69 Cutlass S
Ken, this is called a "surge tank".

Go to the below web site (Classic Muscle) and plug in the GM P/N 403846 in the seach box. They cost $29.99

http://www.parts123.com/parts123/yb....e~cadeiijd#pdf
Old Apr 19, 2010 | 04:18 PM
  #14  
coltsneckbob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 735
From: Colts Neck, NJ
Thanks Ken......now I can get one too; I could't find one anywhere. Though I may still opt for a more elaborate recirculating system.

Incidentally, I would NOT stuff it with cotton as the site suggests. There is a type of breather assembly filter material that I think would be far safer and durable. You can get it at any auto parts store in a small package and it is very cheap.

Even if one uses the "thingy" it seems to me a good idea to extend the rubber tubes coming out of tank and run them to the back of car - about the tank level. In this way fumes will not waft up into the car's passenger compartment as easily and secondly makes it less likely under any circumstances that any fuel can splash out.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blento
Vintage Oldsmobiles
13
Feb 26, 2016 07:44 AM
TOM1972
Major Builds & Projects
2
Jan 2, 2015 12:29 PM
justinj
General Discussion
15
May 8, 2014 12:44 PM
Texas442
General Discussion
2
Jan 30, 2012 05:36 PM
delta254
Eighty-Eight
7
Sep 9, 2011 01:14 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:41 PM.