General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

Synthetic Oil - 63 super 88

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 05:15 PM
  #1  
Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
Synthetic Oil - 63 super 88

I've been using Mobil 1 in my '63 super 88 w/394 cu in engine.
I recently saw an article that said that synthetic oil may not be good for engines with "flat tappets". I'm not technically astute. But, does the 394 engine contain flat tappets?
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 05:50 PM
  #2  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
Never heard that one and yes your olds 394 does fit the discription. Where is the article. I would like to read it.
Old Mar 1, 2009 | 09:29 PM
  #3  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
Was your 394 rebuilt anytime within the past few years.

Syn oil is much thinner than conventional of the same weight, it can find holes in gaskets and leak out pretty quick
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 08:26 AM
  #4  
Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
Synthetic Oil

I have the 63 super 88 for 5 years. It was a frame off restoration about 15 years ago. I have pictures with the engine and transmission out of the car, but don't know if the engine was rebuilt. When I got the car, there was an occasional tapping at highway speeds. A mechanic who worked on the car took off the valve covers and said that everything was perfectly clean. He advised me to use Mobil 1 (10-30). Since then, I haven't heard a noise and haven't had any leaks. But, on 1/2/09 in New York's Newsday newspaper, in the car question section, an ASE certified Master Tech stated that synthetic oil is great for late model engines with roller camshafts and lifters. But recommended that special additives be added to engine oil of older cars. I read another article, which I don't recall the source, that stated that synthetic oil should not be used in engines with flat tappets. I haven't had any problems. Does anyone have any info pro or con? Thanks.
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 09:36 AM
  #5  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,625
From: Southside Vajenya
ALL current fossil oils need additives for safe use in older engines. Anything past API SJ rating needs them. SL/SM are fine for roller cam engines. I'm even leery of newer "clean" diesel-rated oils, though they still have more anti-scuff additive than any modern spark rated oil.

That was always one of the big selling points on synthetics, that they had better lubricity and would not drain off engine components like dino oils. Except for the aforementioned leak-finding propensity, a synthetic should run fine in a flat tappet engine. That's all that were available when synthetic oil formulations first came out and those engines did fine on synthetics.

If the engine runs quiet and uses no appreciable oil, I think you'll be OK to continue using synthetic in it. If you go back to dino oil you may create a whole new set of problems.

Upper valvetrain noise is common on 394, as is heavy blowby after they get some miles on them. The synthetic may actually help those conditions.
Old Mar 2, 2009 | 12:00 PM
  #6  
Bill's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4
The engine starts right up, runs quietly, doesn't smoke, and doesn't burn oil. I've been using Mobil 1 (10-30) for five years.
Thanks for the replies
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tedd Thompson
General Discussion
3
Jun 14, 2012 07:28 PM
70 holiday coupe
General Questions
0
May 31, 2011 08:02 PM
GAOldsman
General Discussion
3
May 12, 2011 04:23 AM
nebuckeye
Small Blocks
0
Apr 1, 2010 06:00 PM
442 Guatemala
Big Blocks
19
Sep 29, 2009 07:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:32 AM.