General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

caster vs king pin inclination

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 4, 2015 | 08:26 AM
  #1  
biggus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 138
caster vs king pin inclination

In my Chilton manual it shows caster for my 68 Cutlass as 1/2 to 2° -. For king pin inclination it shows 9°. What is king pin inclination, I thought that was for strait axels. If it's just a carry over from the days of yor how do they come up with 9°?
Old Jan 4, 2015 | 09:48 AM
  #2  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by biggus
In my Chilton manual it shows caster for my 68 Cutlass as 1/2 to 2° -. For king pin inclination it shows 9°. What is king pin inclination, I thought that was for strait axels. If it's just a carry over from the days of yor how do they come up with 9°?
FYI, the Chassis Service Manual calls it the Ball Joint Inclination angle, which is more correct for a ball joint front end.

The caster angle is the angle of the line through the ball joints relative to vertical when viewed from the side of the car. The kingpin or ball joint inclination angle is this angle when viewed from the front of the car. This is different from camber angle, which is the angle between the tire centerline and vertical.

The ball joint inclination angle is important because it is part of what determines the scrub radius, which is the difference between the point where the line through the ball joints intersects the pavement and the center of the contact patch. The larger the scrub radius, the more difficult the steering force. This is why FWD cars have wheels with a lot of positive offset. The outboard CV joint needs to be in line with the ball joint inclination axis, which pushes the wheel bearing and wheel mounting flange outboard. The positive wheel offset brings the contact patch back towards the car to minimize the scrub radius.
Old Jan 4, 2015 | 10:11 AM
  #3  
biggus's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 138
Thanks Joe. That clears it up. Years ago we played around with designing a zero scrub front end on a stock car. Built several spindles and Arms but could never get clearance for the huge calipers we had to run.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
71POWER
Suspension & Handling
38
Aug 28, 2018 08:00 AM
snylften
General Discussion
6
Feb 20, 2016 05:58 PM
1970-W30
Chassis/Body/Frame
5
Feb 18, 2015 05:29 PM
tmaleck
Suspension & Handling
4
Apr 23, 2013 06:29 AM
thegalex
Chassis/Body/Frame
5
Aug 13, 2010 02:56 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:44 PM.