65 442 ? on ebay
#1
65 442 ? on ebay
I saw a 65 true 442? on ebay. Body tag and cowl tag says ST 65 33827 Lansing Car looks good,however from what I can find (decode) it is a cutlass.Car is located in California and is burgundy in color. Looks like a post car. I have a 65 cutlass 4 speed 330,with the same 33827 numbers. Our body tags look the same except for the last 6 numbers. Please help . Thanks ebay number 261408552650
Last edited by bassinguy; February 26th, 2014 at 05:42 PM. Reason: new info
#2
Here's a direct link to the car on ebay
Usually if the car was a 442 it would have a 4V code where the accessories are located. So this would not be a real 442 according to the info on www.442bro.com
Usually if the car was a 442 it would have a 4V code where the accessories are located. So this would not be a real 442 according to the info on www.442bro.com
Last edited by Allan R; February 26th, 2014 at 06:59 PM. Reason: add web site
#4
Another contradiction............cowl tag shows a Lansing produced car, vin plate is for a Freemont, Ca car. 338275Z13716 see the Z.
Henry
My error, disregard what I said about cowl tag.
Henry
Henry
My error, disregard what I said about cowl tag.
Henry
Last edited by 66400; February 26th, 2014 at 07:22 PM.
#5
The area around the VIN tag also shows the original color ocean mist where the paint is chipped off.
I'm curious why it doesn't have the 4V in the ACC code area so I sent the seller a question asking why not.
I'm curious why it doesn't have the 4V in the ACC code area so I sent the seller a question asking why not.
#6
#7
#8
I don't think you're reading it correctly. If it was a Lansing car,it would have a LAN body #. The BF body # is a Fremont #. Fremont did not put the option codes like Lansing & Framingham built cars. This car would not have the 4V code because of this. I see nothing wrong with the tag.
Last edited by 66-3X2 442; February 26th, 2014 at 07:19 PM.
#9
Not a 100% here but I thought that fremount didn't have the 4v not that this car doesn't have its issues already
#10
All Fremont cars had the magic mirror text at the bottom. They also had that hole (round or diamond shape) as the cowl tag on this one does. The more I look at the info on 'bro's 65 442 ID section related to cowl tags, this one appears to be more and more credible after all. It's just not finished in the same colors it was born with.
#11
I don't think you're reading it correctly. If it was a Lansing car,it would have a LAN body #. The BF body # is a Fremont #. Fremont did not put the option codes like Lansing & Framingham built cars. This car would not have the 4V code because of this. I see nothing wrong with the tag.
Just read the Lansing Michigan on the cowl tag and didn't think beyond that.
Henry
#12
I figured that's what happened. Those Fremont cars are not verifiable as to what it really is by the cowl tag option info. A guy could clone up a 64-67 V-8 Fremont Cutlass into a 442 and nobody could dispute it by the cowl tag.
#14
My cowl tag reads magic mirror also. Above the rivets ,I have a round hole in the cowl tag instead of the diamond looking one in the picture. Where is the vin on the 442 only frame located?
#15
Are you looking at the cowl tag rivets or the vin plate rivets?
The correct vin plate rivets are stainless steel rosette head rivets, not the generic mushroom head aluminum pop rivets on this vin plate.
Henry
#16
#17
#21
I think that's the stamped #'s on the left rear frame by the bumper brackets.
Frame part # and production date.
Henry
#23
If there was another Fremont car to compare vin #'s and cowl tag build dates,that would give an idea if the vin # is correct. It was a late build car,so it would have a higher vin #. By looking @ the car on eBay,I would say it's legit. The vin tag was probably removed during the restoration/painting process and they used regular rivets to put it back on.
#25
the frame is also different on 442, upper control bracket has 4 holes instead of one, and rear frame crossmember lip is rolled,also frame is welded on cutlass right before rear wheels one piece on 442, sometimes its a lot faster looking at that first, I eliminated a couple clones that way,than trying to get frame number, most guys don't change frame to clone, don't get me wrong some do but I say its rare,my 65 442 is a fremont car also so I had to do my homework to, if you want great info on differences go to bros 442 site, great info that helped me a lot
Last edited by olds3442; February 27th, 2014 at 05:29 AM.
#26
$35K?????? a few years back I considered selling my 64 442........"I've owned since new" was lucky to get 15K offers then, I decided since it was worth so little, I keep the thing...... Anyway $35K seems high to me
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post