General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

1967 Olds 425 Big Block- 45 or 39 degree??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April 14th, 2011, 08:37 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
70442rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 63
Smile 1967 Olds 425 Big Block- 45 or 39 degree??

I have recently received an Olds big block which I intend to purchase (I think). The casting numbers appear to indicate a 1967 Olds 425. I was told that a 455 reciprocating assembly has been put into this block. It has been bored 30 over with forged pistons and has the stock 455 Nodular iron crank and rods. I have attached a couple of pictures for your perusal. I am trying to ensure that I am buying a big block with a 39 degree lifter angle versus a 45 degree lifter angle. I have tried to locate the drill spots that some make reference to but cannot locate any. Can you please observe the attached pics and let me know what your thoughts are specific to either a 39 or 45 degree lifter angle block? I want to change the cam and lifters in this block and add a set of modern aluminum cylinder heads. I do not want to spend extra money on re boring the push rod holes to accommodate a 45 lifter angle or on getting a custom cam grind.
Thank you for your consideration!
Regards,
Brad
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
67 425 FrontBlock (3).jpg (76.0 KB, 196 views)
File Type: jpg
67 425Block (6).jpg (107.7 KB, 202 views)
70442rag is offline  
Old April 14th, 2011, 09:28 PM
  #2  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
You have a '66-7 425 Big car engine and if it has no drill spot then it is the 45 degree Another way to check is to measure lifter bore diameter. 0.921" = 39 degree
Scot
GAOldsman is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 12:59 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
below the tip of the screwdriver--the "drill spot" on a 66 toro
mike
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
toro drill spot (Small).JPG (40.9 KB, 266 views)
geckonz08 is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 05:24 AM
  #4  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
It has been suggested (though I cannot confirm that it is DEFINATIVE) that if your motor does not have the larger lifters (i.e. aint a Toro motor), comparison against THIS pic will tell you which lifter back angle you have:

aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 10:33 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,860
Note the two blocks above have no drill mark next to the oil filler hole. They have small lifters and the drill mark therefore must be for large .921" lifters, not the lifter angle. All 389244D 425 blocks with .921" lifters are from Toronados and are 39 degree.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 12:50 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
70442rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 63
Hi Guys,
Thanks for the responses thus far. The short block I have has the smaller .842 lifters and no drill spot....does this mean it is automatically a 45 degree lifter angle block?
Thanks again!
Regards,
Brad
70442rag is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 12:53 PM
  #7  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Unfortunately that would be correct.
Scot
GAOldsman is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 01:15 PM
  #8  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Originally Posted by GAOldsman
Unfortunately that would be correct.
Scot
Actually, it would NOT.

I encourage the original poster to re-read what Lund wrote (suggesting that the drill spot is NOT definitive either way of 39 or 45 degree LBA). I also enocurage him to look at his engine and compare the lifter gallery to the photo I hyperlinked. That assumes the intake manifold is off, but then there will be NO knowing for sure otherwise. Even without seeing it, I would bet that ANY 1967 425 would be a 39 degree motor, as I think the vast majory of '67 motors were.

Last edited by aliensatemybuick; April 15th, 2011 at 01:18 PM.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 01:23 PM
  #9  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
It is a little big but...

GAOldsman is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 02:36 PM
  #10  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Gynormous unreferenced table aside, it has already been documented by people on this site and elsewhere that you can have a 39 degree non toro 425 and no drill spot. In addition to the photo I linked to showing the lifter gallery area, a 45 degree LBA motor will have lifters with the exact same angle off centerline as the cylinder bores (and a 39 degree motor won't). If may be hard to see this by the naked eye, but some have built tools to determine whether this is the case. A keyword search of this site will show posts related to this.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 03:43 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Jaybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 902
I have two '67 425's. More definitive information would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Jaybird

Last edited by Jaybird; April 15th, 2011 at 05:18 PM.
Jaybird is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 04:42 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
radioburningchrome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Lehigh County Pennsylvania
Posts: 679
Where would one find the casting letter for a 1965 425?

After reading this post, I would like to find out.
radioburningchrome is offline  
Old April 15th, 2011, 08:19 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
Originally Posted by radioburningchrome
Where would one find the casting letter for a 1965 425?

After reading this post, I would like to find out.
Looking from the vehicle front.....
To the left of the oil sender to the right of the oil fill tube (as shown above in my previous post)
mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2011, 07:18 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
70442rag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 63
It has also been suggested to me that because the casting of this block was on the 287th day (as per the photo I posted above), it was late enough in the production run of 425's that they stopped creating drill spots as every 425 from mid to late 1967 were automatically a 39 degree lifter angle. This tends to suggest that there was no sense designating one from the other anymore by virtue of creating a drill spot...
Regards,
Brad
70442rag is offline  
Old April 17th, 2011, 07:28 PM
  #15  
Moderator
 
2blu442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Medford, Oregon
Posts: 13,767
Brad, if your not sure this will work for you I'd encourage you to create a post in the parts wanted section. Lots of members here have extra engines, and depending on what part of the country your in you might be able to pick up a rebuildable 455 at a reasonable cost. John
2blu442 is online now  
Old April 18th, 2011, 06:53 AM
  #16  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Originally Posted by 70442rag
It has also been suggested to me that because the casting of this block was on the 287th day (as per the photo I posted above), it was late enough in the production run of 425's that they stopped creating drill spots as every 425 from mid to late 1967 were automatically a 39 degree lifter angle. This tends to suggest that there was no sense designating one from the other anymore by virtue of creating a drill spot...
Regards,
Brad
Not sure I buy that, as Day 287 would be in mid-October, and I would expect then that your motor was built in late 1966, not late 1967 (by October 1967, wouldn't produciton would have moved over to the '68s (and thus 455s rather than 425s)? I admit I do not know what the changeover date was...but I sure would expect it to have been before October 1967. Perhaps others can comment on that.

Ultimately, the safest bet would be to check visually/ measure, but my money is still on it being a 39er.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old April 19th, 2011, 02:06 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
7-d442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
67 non Toro 425's were 39 degree D blocks no drill spot. Take a 12 inch piece of pvc that will fit in the lifter bore with heads off cylinders are bored @ 45 degrees to centerline place the straight edge of a square or any true right angle on the deck surface and if its parallel to the pvc pipe its 45 degrees! That simple. Good luck.
7-d442 is offline  
Old April 19th, 2011, 04:05 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Jaybird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Windsor, Ontario
Posts: 902
7-d442... That sounds good. I will try it.

Thanks,

Jaybird
Jaybird is offline  
Old April 27th, 2011, 05:01 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
therobski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth
Posts: 3,129
Okay for S$$ts and Giggles here is a few pictures of my 65 45 degree 425 block.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
IMG_0867.jpg (73.0 KB, 148 views)
File Type: jpg
IMG_0868.jpg (60.1 KB, 127 views)
therobski is offline  
Old April 27th, 2011, 05:12 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Boldsmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,119
I have one of those too ........ it was listed on Craigslist as a 1968 455 from a Delta. Seller didnt even take the time to look up the casting numbers. I love buying 425s for 455 prices.

IMG00208-20110426-20461.jpg
Boldsmobile is offline  
Old May 22nd, 2011, 06:05 PM
  #21  
Lt. Buzzkill (ret.)
 
copper128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,297
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
It has been suggested (though I cannot confirm that it is DEFINATIVE) that if your motor does not have the larger lifters (i.e. aint a Toro motor), comparison against THIS pic will tell you which lifter back angle you have:


This photo is how I confirmed the '67 425 D engine that was sold to me as being a .842" lifter, 39 degree block was, in fact a 45 degree block. After comparing it to the photo, it was obvious
I replaced it with a '67 Toronado 425 (with drill spot) block, then spent plenty to have the lifter bores bushed for use with .842" solid roller lifters.
copper128 is offline  
Old May 22nd, 2011, 06:21 PM
  #22  
Lt. Buzzkill (ret.)
 
copper128's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Western New York
Posts: 1,297
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
[I encourage the original poster to re-read what Lund wrote (suggesting that the drill spot is NOT definitive either way of 39 or 45 degree LBA).
Further evidence that the drill spot is not an indicator of LBA is that the same situation (changeover from 45 to 39* LBA) occurred in the 330 small blocks, yet 330's never had any outward indication of which LBA they were machined for. If Olds didn't bother marking the 330's, why would they do it with the 425?
Simple answer: They didn't. I agree that the drill spot almost certainly indicates lifter size (.921"). It was ONLY used on pre-68 big blocks, and they were the only modern Olds engines to receive the big lifters.
copper128 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hotrodpc
Big Blocks
41
June 21st, 2021 06:38 AM
Delmont 88 PA
Parts Wanted
7
December 16th, 2015 03:37 PM
193072olds
Big Blocks
3
February 20th, 2013 09:47 AM
AZ442
Big Blocks
1
September 15th, 2011 03:56 PM
rt38 classic engines
Big Blocks
3
May 9th, 2006 05:28 PM



Quick Reply: 1967 Olds 425 Big Block- 45 or 39 degree??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:33 PM.