Carb flow ratings
June 10th, 2011, 04:50 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 259
Carb flow ratings
This is something not terribly critical to me, but I've wondered about it from time to time.
When suppliers give a carb flow rating, what are they saying exactly? I can say a carb is rated at 850cfm, but it is possible to get 850 cfm running through a carb rated at 650cfm... you just have a higher pressure drop through the lower rated carb.
If I am thinking right about this anyone can give a flow rating, but without any idea of the losses at that flow you can't compare with another carb, even if that carb has the same rating.
On top of that, flows would also depend on your air filter... I'm guessing their rating is based on no filter.
Have you guys seen anything that would clear this up? In the aftermarket world especially, I wouldn't be surprised if there is no standard that manufacturers are using to get their specs.
When suppliers give a carb flow rating, what are they saying exactly? I can say a carb is rated at 850cfm, but it is possible to get 850 cfm running through a carb rated at 650cfm... you just have a higher pressure drop through the lower rated carb.
If I am thinking right about this anyone can give a flow rating, but without any idea of the losses at that flow you can't compare with another carb, even if that carb has the same rating.
On top of that, flows would also depend on your air filter... I'm guessing their rating is based on no filter.
Have you guys seen anything that would clear this up? In the aftermarket world especially, I wouldn't be surprised if there is no standard that manufacturers are using to get their specs.
June 10th, 2011, 06:26 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
Standard test vacuum was 1-1/2 inches of mercury for 4 barrel carburetors and 3 inches of mercury “Vacuum” for 1 barrel and 2 barrel carburetors. This was reasonable as it was about what a passenger car would develop. Of course, for the numbers to mean anything, tests would have to be run at a certain temperature and barometric pressure. Or be corrected to standard temperature and pressure. If not otherwise stated, ratings in cubic feet per minute are at standard temperature and pressure.
The above was taken from a race carb sight.
They are rated at standard inches of mercury to maintain a somewhat level playing field. Could you get 850cfm out of a 650cfm carb? Sure if you force fed air through it but that would disregard the standards set. You'll notice head manufacturers will play this game by measuring cfm at say 26 inches of mercury rather than the standard 28 inches. You can play with the numbers this way but it's hardly accurate. That's why they make standards.
The above was taken from a race carb sight.
They are rated at standard inches of mercury to maintain a somewhat level playing field. Could you get 850cfm out of a 650cfm carb? Sure if you force fed air through it but that would disregard the standards set. You'll notice head manufacturers will play this game by measuring cfm at say 26 inches of mercury rather than the standard 28 inches. You can play with the numbers this way but it's hardly accurate. That's why they make standards.
Last edited by TripDeuces; June 10th, 2011 at 06:36 PM.
June 11th, 2011, 06:41 AM
#3
Old(s) Fart
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,311
Standard test vacuum was 1-1/2 inches of mercury for 4 barrel carburetors and 3 inches of mercury “Vacuum” for 1 barrel and 2 barrel carburetors. This was reasonable as it was about what a passenger car would develop. Of course, for the numbers to mean anything, tests would have to be run at a certain temperature and barometric pressure. Or be corrected to standard temperature and pressure. If not otherwise stated, ratings in cubic feet per minute are at standard temperature and pressure.
The above was taken from a race carb sight.
The above was taken from a race carb sight.
June 11th, 2011, 06:50 AM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
http://www.candsspecialties.com/index.html
I copied it from this sight. Better report it to the plagiarism police.
I copied it from this sight. Better report it to the plagiarism police.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nickd
Big Blocks
21
September 10th, 2017 08:40 AM
MDchanic
General Questions
6
October 22nd, 2011 05:57 AM
