General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

where did the r134a go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 29th, 2017, 04:30 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chip-powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,325
where did the r134a go?

Last year, my biggest project was replacing most of my air conditioning components (compressor, evaporator, POA, drier, O rings), and converting over to r134a. Everything went great and I had ice cold air the rest of the summer.

She went into storage for the winter and now that the weather is hot again I turned on the a/c...and got hot air blowing on me! I figured that a leak must have sprung up some where so I took her up to my local garage so that they could test the system...and the results were...no leaks.

If a car is in storage and not being used for months, will r134a evaporate, or maybe seep out somehow?

I'm stumped.
chip-powell is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 04:39 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Koda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Evansville, IN
Posts: 10,953
So, what was the pressure in the system at the shop? AC systems will leak to a certain degree. What I would diagnose the system as, you did not run the compressor all winter, and the O rings, which need to be lubed, leaked. Other contributing factors may have been an incorrect amount of R134a put in (as in low), and oil in the system.


R134A is cheap. Charge her up and run the car every month in the winter. Every other system on a car can sit for a while, provided good gas. AC systems need circulated. That being said, running the car in the winter causes its own issues, like improper warming up and such. I like to start them, run them to warm, run them back and forth in gear, leave them on different spots on the tires, cycle the AC, run the heat, etc.
Koda is online now  
Old June 29th, 2017, 05:03 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,471
Did you upgrade the hoses when you converted to r134a? If you used NOS hoses they probably don't have a barrier lining. It's my understanding that AC hoses need a special lining to prevent the r134a from attacking or penetrating them.

This was mentioned by one of our other members recently, I think it was MDchanic.
Olds64 is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 05:55 AM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chip-powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,325
The hoses were the one thing that I did not replace. Mainly due to the cost, and that they appeared to still be in very good condition. I'm going to have to wait on replacing them for the time being (the money is already allocated elsewhere). I guess that I will recheck the O rings and then charge it up again to see if it will hold. Thanks for the advise guys.
chip-powell is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 06:05 AM
  #5  
Gary
 
VC455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Gillespie County Texas
Posts: 2,221
Originally Posted by Olds64
...AC hoses need a special lining to prevent the r134a from attacking or penetrating them.
In older cars, changes occur in the lining of the OEM hoses that create a film that is nearly equivalent in barrier property to the new hoses.

This should still be considered a possibility--just not the number one factor.
VC455 is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 07:25 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
chip-powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,325
Originally Posted by VC455
In older cars, changes occur in the lining of the OEM hoses that create a film that is nearly equivalent in barrier property to the new hoses.

This should still be considered a possibility--just not the number one factor.
When you say "older cars", how old do you mean? 50s, 60's? This is a '71 cutlass.
chip-powell is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 07:35 AM
  #7  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,471
I've heard the same thing in reference to hardening valve seats in the head. I don't mean to call BS though.

In any event, when retrofitting AC to r134a, r12a or any other refrigerant it's best to replace the receiver / drier along with the hoses and orifice tube. I understand that MAWs can get carried away.

When I charged the AC in my truck yesterday I did it with the intent of getting by as cheaply as possible. So, I just added refrigerant without replacing parts or pulling a vacuum on the system. I've gotten away with it so far.
Olds64 is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 08:01 AM
  #8  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 41,060
If mechanic needed to ad freon, you have a leak.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old June 29th, 2017, 08:53 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Junkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Connecticut
Posts: 783
Originally Posted by Olds64
I've heard the same thing in reference to hardening valve seats in the head. I don't mean to call BS though.

In any event, when retrofitting AC to r134a, r12a or any other refrigerant it's best to replace the receiver / drier along with the hoses and orifice tube. I understand that MAWs can get carried away.

When I charged the AC in my truck yesterday I did it with the intent of getting by as cheaply as possible. So, I just added refrigerant without replacing parts or pulling a vacuum on the system. I've gotten away with it so far.


If your system still has refrigerant in it, but not enough to cool, then you can get away with adding refrigerant, since it hasn't been open to the atmosphere. I have done this many times in the past.


As for where did his refrigerant go, my best guess is that it escaped through the hoses. I have heard that many times, the refrigerant and oil will cause a barrier to be established in the hoses, but I have never seen it happen with any car that I have worked on. R12 is a larger molecule than R134A. I am in the process of converting the hoses on my 1962 Chevrolet to all barrier hoses, since the originals have become so brittle, that the clamps will no longer hold the refrigerant in. I also have heard from others that you can't do this, because the hoses will not go over the barb fittings. I used refrigerant oil and my heat gun, and had no problem pushing them on, on the ones that I have done so far. I had to stop, since to get the evaporator out of the cowl, it requires the removal of the fender, bumper, and hood. Since I usually work alone, this presents a problem. I am also sitting on the fence deciding if I want to tackle the seals in the compressor, since it didn't leak, and worked perfectly prior to the refrigerant loss. It is always a toss up where to stop parts replacement, especially on a system that is pressure sensitive. Some "O" rings are easy to acquire, but there is one very small one, that I have yet to find a source for, unless I want to use butyl rubber. The problem with butyl rubber "O" rings today, is that they come from China, and the quality is questionable.
Junkman is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 09:41 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
edzolz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Red Oak, Texas
Posts: 2,999
You should always pull a vacuum on the system before recharging. I pull the vacuum and let the system sit over night to make sure there are no small leaks that will cause the system to lose charge. If the vacuum is at max and stays overnight, there is a better chance of there not being a leak.
edzolz is online now  
Old June 29th, 2017, 09:51 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Junkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Connecticut
Posts: 783
Originally Posted by edzolz
You should always pull a vacuum on the system before recharging. I pull the vacuum and let the system sit over night to make sure there are no small leaks that will cause the system to lose charge. If the vacuum is at max and stays overnight, there is a better chance of there not being a leak.
Originally Posted by Olds64
I've heard the same thing in reference to hardening valve seats in the head. I don't mean to call BS though.

In any event, when retrofitting AC to r134a, r12a or any other refrigerant it's best to replace the receiver / drier along with the hoses and orifice tube. I understand that MAWs can get carried away.

When I charged the AC in my truck yesterday I did it with the intent of getting by as cheaply as possible. So, I just added refrigerant without replacing parts or pulling a vacuum on the system. I've gotten away with it so far.


I agree with you 100% about pulling a vacuum and then I pressurize with nitrogen, so I know that it holds both ways. Sometimes as a matter of financial concerns, people don't have the luxury of doing it the best way, and only want to get through the season. If the system is totally empty, then there is a severe leak, if only a little amount, there is a better chance that the "leak" is through the hoses, and that is an expensive repair for most.
I have a local hydraulic hose shop that will remove original fittings when possible, and re swage them onto the new barrier hose. It doesn't look 100% original, but it sure makes it a lot easier then not being able to buy a replacement hose at all, because the fittings are so weirdly configured with bends.
Junkman is offline  
Old June 29th, 2017, 12:16 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,716
Originally Posted by Junkman
R12 is a larger molecule than R134A.
Didn't we go through this a while back?

Posts from 2015:
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-not-r12a.html

Originally Posted by MDchanic
Sorry, but after two repetitions, I have to respond to this.

R-134a is a molecule with two carbon atoms attached to each other, with four fluorines and two hydrogens attached to them.
Its diameter is 5.24Å.

R-12, with only one carbon, two fluorines, and two chlorines is smaller.
Its diameter is 5.09Å.
Originally Posted by Junkman
Thank you for your explanation of the molecules and the fire. I stand corrected and have learned from your explanation.
Thanks again
Junk...
Fun71 is online now  
Old June 29th, 2017, 12:44 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Junkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Connecticut
Posts: 783
old age forgetfulness.. Decided that I should look this up for myself. Seems that every site that I visit with the help of Google, agree that R134 is a smaller molecule. You can click on the posts for the links and verify this information for each one that I posted. There is a lot of good information out there, and we all have to keep an open mind, and we can learn a lot from this information.


www.allchemi.com/eng/refregerants/description/mackfri-134a.html



https://griffiths.com/ac-system-help.../r134a-vs-r12/


. Conversions are not as simple as the guy at the auto parts store would make it seem. Do your own research on "R134a conversions" here and on the web.
Here's my guess as to why so many people have got it wrong on the molecular size: They are confusing molecular weight with molecular size. The molecular weight is 120.9 for R-12 and 102.1 for R-134a, so it seems like R-12 is bigger than R-134a, but molecular weight is not the same thing as molecular size. The configuration of the molecular structure and the bond length between all the atoms in the molecular determine the molecular size. The molecular weight is determined only by the empirical formula of the molecule.

I got my molecular size data from a physicist at a refrigerant manufacturing company, and this data is used by the people who create molecular sieves for refrigerant drying so they can design the correct pore size in the sieve to hold water and exclude refrigerant. I can't speak for where the other people came up with their determination that R-12 is larger than R-134a.

The PAG will only very slowly degrade the rubber, but from a hose manufacturers view, it will affect the strength of the hose during the life of the vehicle. It seemed to be a relatively quick and easy change to move the nylon layer to provide more protection for the rubber layers. I don't think the R-134a / PAG in non-barrier hoses was any kind of major leak problem, as evidenced by retrofitted hoses from R-12 / mineral oil systems holding up well as long as the rubber was saturated with mineral oil prior to the retrofit. It turned out the mineral oil adsorbed into the R-12 hoses provided a good barrier to the R-134a, and cut way down on the leak rates for R-134a after retrofits. The retrofit hoses saturated with mineral oil were not as good as a true barrier hose, but they work well enough.

There isn't much publicly available data on hose leak rates, and I am remembering the data my company generated to support R-134a retrofits back in the early 1990s. We actually measured the leak rates of 'normal' hoses and barrier hoses, in retrofit and OEM uses. The hose test was done in a sealed box at controlled temperatures with hoses pressurized with refrigerant. We measured the concentration of refrigerant in the box to calculate the leak rates per square meter of hose surface.
http://www.acsource.net/acforum/view...php?f=1&t=8578
at the bottom of the page.

Last edited by Junkman; June 29th, 2017 at 02:42 PM.
Junkman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
My2nd 69 442
Major Builds & Projects
43
October 11th, 2020 12:38 AM
68442Convertible
Other
4
March 20th, 2015 12:11 PM
1970-W30
General Discussion
18
April 2nd, 2013 06:21 PM
Oldsguy
Other
2
April 24th, 2006 07:43 AM
Oldsguy
Other
0
August 18th, 2004 04:51 AM



Quick Reply: where did the r134a go?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:57 PM.