General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Upside Down Air Cleaner Cover

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September 7th, 2010, 06:32 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Milton GA
Posts: 44
Upside Down Air Cleaner Cover

I was showing my 72 vert with a 350 4barrel to a few guys last week. I've only had the car for a month or so and have been focused on the tranny leaks and front end issues. We all noticed that the air cleaner cover was on upside down (by previous owner).
Me and another guy remember doing this with our other GM cars 'back in the day'. Two other guys said its wrong and I should put it on right side up.
Car runs great and sounds great although its only getting 10 mpg.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
air filter cover.jpg (51.7 KB, 156 views)
mhood is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 06:34 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
Put it on the correct way. Upside down it just letting hot air into the carb. You'll get better performance with it installed correctly
citcapp is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 06:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
Guys used to do that "to increase performance" by allowing more air into the carb, if the stock snorkel opening is the size of a golf ball (kinda like mine!)
As a bonus, you also get to hear the 4 barrel howl when you stomp it - music to my ears...

The down side, is that the engine will be ingesting lots of hot air - not a good thing. Of course my stock snorkel is pulling in from the hot engine bay anyway, so not sure which is better.
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:15 AM
  #4  
Land Yacht Captain
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
Yeah lets get realistic. Unless you are talking about a high end model that has outside air ducted to the air cleaner housing every single factory air cleaner is sucking in hot engine bay air just through a smaller opening.

That's just an economical way of having an open air cleaner without spending money on an aftermarket unit.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:27 AM
  #5  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,726
The reality is that there is virtually no difference in measurable performance. It SOUNDS louder, so the "butt dyno" says it's faster. Unfortunately, the butt dyno is rarely calibrated correctly.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:28 AM
  #6  
Past Administrator
 
Oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Posts: 10,069
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The reality is that there is virtually no difference in measurable performance. It SOUNDS louder, so the "butt dyno" says it's faster. Unfortunately, the butt dyno is rarely calibrated correctly.
That's funny............butt dyno. I like it.
Oldsguy is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 09:05 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Boldsmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,119
Id agree with Joe but also would add i dont understand why it takes in hotter air from the top as opposed to cooler air through the snorkel. Pat am i missing something?
Boldsmobile is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 09:27 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
cutlassjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Windsor, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 836
We used to do that in high school. My mom had a 77' Newport with a 400 lean burn engine. It sounded cool, but that's about all it did....Thanks for triggering the memories.
cutlassjoe is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 09:47 AM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,726
Originally Posted by Boldsmobile
Id agree with Joe but also would add i dont understand why it takes in hotter air from the top as opposed to cooler air through the snorkel. Pat am i missing something?
Not sure what your question is, exactly. The underhood temp is about the same at both locations. If the car is newer and has an outside air hose attached to the snorkel, then the question becomes one of which flow path is more restrictive. The inverted top will let in much hot air than cold air that could be drawn from the snorkel.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 10:50 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
mmurphy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Putting a taller Air Filter element will achieve the same affect without having to flip the lid provided the wing nut stud is long enough. I agree with others, though. Quadrajet 'howl' and a little more air in is pretty much the only changes it makes resulting in no performance gains.
mmurphy77 is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 11:17 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
442much's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 2,623
Originally Posted by Oldsguy
That's funny............butt dyno. I like it.
Yeah, the older I get, the faster I was. Must have measured the quickness via the "butt dyno" back then. If you lost, it felt more like the "butt gyno".
442much is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 04:07 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
Boldsmobile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,119
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Not sure what your question is, exactly. The underhood temp is about the same at both locations. If the car is newer and has an outside air hose attached to the snorkel, then the question becomes one of which flow path is more restrictive. The inverted top will let in much hot air than cold air that could be drawn from the snorkel.
Joe, post above me from citcapp mentioned put it the correct way because he was letting hot air in. That implied putting it the right way would let cooler air in. I was curious where that cooler air was coming from.

I assume the inlet air temp was ~the same at both locations. Unless it had 68 like hose leading to snorkel. Thats why i was wondering why putting it the right way would let cooler air in, if its just a regular old snorkel.
Boldsmobile is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 04:21 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,521
in all reality for most of us it doesn't matter a bit - what would it affect 1 - 2 hp either way on the street? I on the other hand remember doing that to all my cars, the sound alone was worth it - if I didn't have OAI, I'd do it to my 442 all over again
stevengerard is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 06:58 PM
  #14  
GM Enthusiast
 
OLD SKL 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,982
Car runs great and sounds great although its only getting 10 mpg.
Probably only getting 10 mpg because your enjoying that "muscle car sound" every time you step on it!
OLD SKL 69 is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 07:44 PM
  #15  
Senior Moment Member
 
z11375ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,916
I loved that as a kid. 69 Chevelle small block. Mom's car. Turn the corner and flip the lid. WAAAAAAAAA!!!!!! F'in A! Leave it if you like it, what's the diff?
z11375ss is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 08:03 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
442much's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sherwood Park, Alberta
Posts: 2,623
I remember doing that to my dad's 1968 Pontiac Grande Parisienne (Bonneville in the US). That 327 sounded pretty cool.
442much is offline  
Old September 7th, 2010, 08:54 PM
  #17  
1970 442
 
WhatIf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 238
Originally Posted by 66ninetyeightls
Unless you are talking about a high end model that has outside air ducted to the air cleaner housing every single factory air cleaner is sucking in hot engine bay air just through a smaller opening.
But I am reminded of this bizarre 1968 H/O road test where Doc Watson had the air cleaner lid flipped! I think the conclusion we had on this when we talked about it before was Doc flipped the lid to make it sound better for the cameras.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpmxaamNwhw
WhatIf is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 05:29 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
About 15 years ago I bought a flat lid from a yard to put on my 86. The four barrel howled so loud that it vibrated something back towards the trunk.
It made bystanders look for sure!
Butt dyno said 50HP gain, but in reality, it was still the same ol' 307...

Lady now wears that lid as I try to figure out how to make her 4bbl open ALL the way...
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 11:14 AM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
mhood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Milton GA
Posts: 44
Smile

Thanks for all the advice. I guess my take is that it doesn't really matter. I'm torn between how much I like the sound and the fact I would like to clean up the cover and put a Rocket 350 decal on. Maybe the decal will work with the lid upside down.
I do have a lead foot so that may account for the mileage
mhood is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 12:18 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
Just find ya a flatter or smaller dia lid at a yard that the decal will fit on - thats what I did.
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 02:20 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
Originally Posted by mhood
I'm torn between how much I like the sound and the fact I would like to clean up the cover and put a Rocket 350 decal on. Maybe the decal will work with the lid upside down.
As was suggested. simply use a taller air filter element (paper, K&N, whatever) and keep the lid right-side-up so you can see the decal. The added benefit is that with the lid the right way, you're using its contours the way the engineers intended, probably creating less turbulence at the throat of the carb.
BlackGold is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 02:46 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
erke88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 81
Originally Posted by mhood
Thanks for all the advice. I guess my take is that it doesn't really matter. I'm torn between how much I like the sound and the fact I would like to clean up the cover and put a Rocket 350 decal on. Maybe the decal will work with the lid upside down.
I do have a lead foot so that may account for the mileage
I have a 71 cutlass supreme with a 350 4bbl. It also gets around 10 miles to the gallon. Glad im not alone
erke88 is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 06:41 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
young olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mt Vernon,WA
Posts: 1,957
i looked at this thread twice before i had an idea i had to try. i had an open element air cleaner top laying around all i needed was a longer wing nut stud, so i got one. i dont care for the look of an open element air cleaner but i think this looks pretty cool.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
001 (2).JPG (177.3 KB, 123 views)
File Type: jpg
002 (2).JPG (171.4 KB, 90 views)
File Type: jpg
003 (2).JPG (180.3 KB, 107 views)

Last edited by young olds; September 8th, 2010 at 06:44 PM.
young olds is offline  
Old September 8th, 2010, 06:55 PM
  #24  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
I thought the more air and fuel the motor got, the more horsepower it could make...we've all known this to be true since day one. I'm not following the "Less" air is better logic. Many in the hotrodding industry refer to engines as "Giant air pumps", meaning that more air and fuel means better performance. The "Howl" that is heard from the upside down lid is more air getting into the motor...somehow this is bad????????? Someone explain what has suddenly changed regarding the way a motor functions best. Cannot believe posts saying less air and fuel is better for more power. I have a full 360 degree open element on my car, plus the X-treme air filter lid. This is hurting my horsepower ...couldn't be.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 05:38 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
With the size of this snorkel opening, i figure any additional openings would help...

Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 06:14 AM
  #26  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by lady72nrob71
with the size of this snorkel opening, i figure any additional openings would help...

exactly !!!
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 09:02 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
tonycpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Cheboygan, Michigan
Posts: 126
how big is the intake port in the head for each cylinder?
your motor only fires one cylinder at a time.
tonycpe is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 09:40 AM
  #28  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by tonycpe
your motor only fires one cylinder at a time.

Give the gentleman a cigar.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 10:09 AM
  #29  
Land Yacht Captain
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
Yes but that is purely ignition. On an 8 cylinder engine there is more than one cylinder at different stages of the intake stroke at any given time.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 11:03 AM
  #30  
Registered
 
Bluevista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 4,430
The engine can only pull in so much air, air is still air no matter how it gets there, air temperature is more of a factor.
The GM engineers wore out a lot of slide rules figuring out how big that snorkel opening had to be.
That four barrel air cleaner opening is huge compared to my two barrel.
Bluevista is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 11:07 AM
  #31  
Land Yacht Captain
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
Very valid points Blue. lol

Last edited by 66ninetyeightls; September 9th, 2010 at 11:26 AM.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 11:14 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
Originally Posted by Bluevista
That four barrel air cleaner opening is huge compared to my two barrel.
You're kidding, right?
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 01:29 PM
  #33  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by Bluevista
The GM engineers wore out a lot of slide rules figuring out how big that snorkel opening had to be.
That was just to get it down the road and to be reliable, not to give the motor the most outstanding performance gains possible.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 02:23 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
69oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Meridian, Idaho
Posts: 411
The deciding factor is your carb. If you have a factory Q-jet, 650cfm is probably the max air it can move. Unless your snorkel will not move the same you will never get more air than that. The upside down air cleaner lid has been debated/argued since the first person did it who knows when. Bottom line is, as Joe said, you will only see the hp gains on the coveted butt dyno. The increase in sound that you hear is not more air but simply less obstruction to the sound. Put your ear next to the snorkel and have someone snap open your 4bbl.
With that said, I'm all for the sonically tuned butt dyno. Throaty carbs = morning wood any time of the day.
69oldsguy is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 02:47 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
You can't talk volume of flow without also talking about pressure drop. The carb does not restrict the flow to any particular number. If I remember corectly, the industry standard is to rate 4-bbl carbs at 1.5" Hg of pressure drop and 2-bbl carbs at 3" Hg pressure drop.

The Quadrajet, as installed on big-block Olds, is typically rated at 750 cfm. If that is indeed at 1.5" of pressure drop, then if the throat of your air cleaner nozzle has the same area as the Q-jet's throttle bores (sounds like a good approximation to me), you now have 3" of pressure drop. Add in another inch or two for the air filter element, and we're now looking at an intake manifold vacuum of 4 - 5" at wide-open throttle (but only when really flowing 750 cfm, which would only happen at really high RPM).

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is that the throat of the nozzle is probably about the same amount of restriction as the carb, and the air filter, which is not insignificant. Will you gain lots of HP by flipping the lid? Doubtful. But it probably nets you a couple HP (provided the rest of your combination isn't really restricted somewhere, like in the exhaust).
BlackGold is offline  
Old September 9th, 2010, 10:23 PM
  #36  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Originally Posted by 69oldsguy
The increase in sound that you hear is not more air but simply less obstruction to the sound.
Utterly and completely incorrect. The sound is more air coming in. My 360 degree filter was at one time old and dirty (and paper). I changed it with a K&N filter. The first time I floored it, the sound of the improved AIR FLOW was enormous. Same exact set up, but the new filter allowed more air to ROAR into the carb.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old March 28th, 2012, 06:34 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
JimMorrisonFan67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida
Posts: 37
Hi,
My hubby and I have searched the web looking for a replacement air filter cover for our 72 cutlass 350. I've searched this forum and we haven't found what we are looking for. I figured this was a good place to post this.
Can anyone give us suggestions on where to look. We have already looked at YearOne, The Parts Place, Original Parts group. The closest on Original Parts group still doesn't look OEM to us. Our current cover is too pitted and rusted to keep. Your advice is appreciated.
JimMorrisonFan67 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2012, 06:51 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Lady72nRob71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 11,798
Originally Posted by JimMorrisonFan67
Our current cover is too pitted and rusted to keep. Your advice is appreciated.
Put out a post in the "parts wanted" section that you seek an air cleaner lid for a 72 350. Also specify if 2 or 4bbl.
You should be able to find a good used one and just clean and repaint it. After then it will look as stock as can be!
Lady72nRob71 is offline  
Old March 28th, 2012, 07:46 PM
  #39  
Registered User
 
starfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Southeast Michigan
Posts: 1,224
OK, so my 1987 442 with the monsterous 307 4bbl has an air cleaner with two snorkles, one that is just open to the engine compartment and one that extends with a hose to the battery area.

What is the engineering idea with that? Why not have just the "cold" air intake, why the hot air on the other side? My '68 has half the air intake my '87 has.
starfire is offline  
Old March 28th, 2012, 08:53 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Highwayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Colorado
Posts: 489
For all these years I thought GM engineered the snorkel to keep the car quite so respectable folks could listen to the radio and hear themselves think. Then they put open element filters on the performance cars for the rest of us.
Highwayman is offline  


Quick Reply: Upside Down Air Cleaner Cover



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:00 PM.