General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Trading My DD For Another Cutlass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 1st, 2013, 12:24 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plee3 64Olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 231
Trading My DD For Another Cutlass

I am in need of your opinions. I have a 91 Honda Accord that I been working on since 08. It’s been my daily driver since and I love it. There is a 93 Cutlass on C/L that the owner is willing to trade. I am really interested in closing the deal if the Cutlass is running good. It would be pretty cool to own 2 Cutlass from different eras. I put a lot of blood sweat and tears into this vehicle In fact, here is my members page below:

http://www.cb7tuner.com/vbb/showthread.php?t=138589&highlight=plee3

Here is the car in question:

http://chicago.craigslist.org/sox/cto/3905100410.html

My question is this, IMO, my Accord is worth more than $1700 but the fact of owning 2 Oldsmobiles from 2 different time periods is pretty cool to me. What is your opinion on this??? I will meet with the seller this afternoon.
plee3 64Olds is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 12:31 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
455man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,070
The 94 Cutlass Supreme I owned was the 3.4L motor and I had to replace the timing belt every 50,000 miles. It was a pain. Also the alternator was at the bottom of the engine near the firewall. It overheated and had to be replaced. The axle had to come out to get to it. Another pain. An aftermarket stereo system would put more stress on the alternator. This car might be the 3.1L motor though. I had a 72 Cutlass supreme at the time and I thought it was cool.
455man is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 12:34 PM
  #3  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,771
Sorry my friend, keep the Honda.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old July 1st, 2013, 12:40 PM
  #4  
wait.... what....
 
oldzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London Ont Canada
Posts: 817
Like 455man said... I had a 92 Z34 with the 3.4 and the alternator, and timing belt were ongoing issues. I would not buy it if that was the motor that was in it IMO.
oldzzy is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 12:48 PM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plee3 64Olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 231
Originally Posted by 455man
The 94 Cutlass Supreme I owned was the 3.4L motor and I had to replace the timing belt every 50,000 miles. It was a pain. Also the alternator was at the bottom of the engine near the firewall. It overheated and had to be replaced. The axle had to come out to get to it. Another pain. An aftermarket stereo system would put more stress on the alternator. This car might be the 3.1L motor though. I had a 72 Cutlass supreme at the time and I thought it was cool.
This is the stuff that I need to hear. Keep it comming!
plee3 64Olds is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 02:22 PM
  #6  
morgan
 
pogo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 1,925
When i see a car like that and the description starts with woofers,amps etc and shiny pimp wheels....i would stay away
pogo69 is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 02:49 PM
  #7  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
American companies did not make good cars in the '90s.

I'll echo OldCutlass's sentiment - Keep the Honda, they're good, reliable (extremely boring) cars.

If you want to trade the Honda for an Olds, trade it for an older one, like from the '60s or early '70s, so you have a solid, reliable car.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 03:45 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
plee3 64Olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago IL
Posts: 231
Originally Posted by pogo69
When i see a car like that and the description starts with woofers,amps etc and shiny pimp wheels....i would stay away
Yes that is correct. Pretty much the first thing that he mentioned. To top it off, the equipment that he has is very low quality and installation looks crappy.
Originally Posted by MDchanic
American companies did not make good cars in the '90s.

I'll echo OldCutlass's sentiment - Keep the Honda, they're good, reliable (extremely boring) cars.

If you want to trade the Honda for an Olds, trade it for an older one, like from the '60s or early '70s, so you have a solid, reliable car.

- Eric
Im going to stand down on this deal. I just drove the Honda a few minutes ago and Im still attached to the vehicle. This was my first major automotive project and its still running strong!
plee3 64Olds is offline  
Old July 1st, 2013, 08:19 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
64Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Union City Calif.94587
Posts: 2,383
Keep the Honda!!!!!!!!!!!!

Gene
64Rocket is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
69fourspeed
The Newbie Forum
7
September 27th, 2014 08:14 PM
coldwar
General Discussion
37
February 20th, 2014 01:09 AM
jpc647
The Clubhouse
117
September 21st, 2011 08:51 PM
viper771
General Discussion
0
April 24th, 2011 02:56 AM
pgh442
442
72
August 7th, 2009 09:15 PM



Quick Reply: Trading My DD For Another Cutlass



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:25 PM.