When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I also thought the JO-coded TH350 was available in '69 but if Joe says otherwise I'll have to re-evaluate my stance on this..
I'll have to correct myself here. The 1969 PIM shows the JO code TH350 for W31 use. The 1969 SPECS booklet doesn't show it, but the trans application page from the PIM shows that W31 application was added on 9-19-68, so Olds had planned on using it when the TH350 finally became available midyear.
I'll have to correct myself here. The 1969 PIM shows the JO code TH350 for W31 use. The 1969 SPECS booklet doesn't show it, but the trans application page from the PIM shows that W31 application was added on 9-19-68, so Olds had planned on using it when the TH350 finally became available midyear.
Joe P, thank you. I was doubting my memory a little. My wife (deceased) and another young lady who also loved drag racing, were allowed to "order" a car for the showroom floor that would attract young buyers. They picked a Black W-31 with Gold stripes and black interior. The only stipulation was "automatic transmission". This happened at Tate Cadillac-Olds in the spring of 1969.
I also did a 2nd take when Joe first mentioned no TH350 for W31 until '70. I pulled out my ancient 442: A Source Book, which I knew contained a "Doctor Olds" series of ads for the '69 W cars, and the page describing the W31 shows only manual transmissions available. A mid-year introduction of the TH350 in '69 and an apparent disconnect between engineering and marketing (a result of creating the advertisements before the TH350 introduction) makes perfect sense.
1969 Car life road test of automatic W31. Note the as tested weight of 3935 lbs. that’s with two people. Let’s say subtract 200 for the passenger we get 3735
The engineering team developed the W31 because they knew the G400s were crap. Once the project was underway the marketing team got involved and put the Ram Rod name on the car. So again to answer the guys question Ram Rod means nothing.
In typical Olds fashion they built a non competitive car in the 68-69 442 and had to put a silly name on the engine to hype it. The W31 was built to compete in NHRA and instead of marketing that, they put a silly name on it. So yes it wasn’t enough.
where do you come up with that crap? you saying they weren’t competitive is absolutely not true.the 68/69 W30’s were arguably the most successful years Olds had in NHRA class racing . D/S especially the W30 broke and held national records many times. It’s well documented. A friend of mine here in Ontario was cleaning up in D Stock at Sparta/st Thomas and Cayuga.. in 68 thru 70 with his his 68 W30. he drove it back and forth to the track initially. He still has it..28,000 original miles. the engine was factory original the first couple years of racing with headers added. It never blew up.
Think Berijik, Brainbeau , Anderson and others. National record holders
where do you come up with that crap? you saying they weren’t competitive is absolutely not true.the 68/69 W30’s were arguably the most successful years Olds had in NHRA class racing . D/S especially the W30 broke and held national records many times. It’s well documented. A friend of mine here in Ontario was cleaning up in D Stock at Sparta/st Thomas and Cayuga.. in 68 thru 70 with his his 68 W30. he drove it back and forth to the track initially. He still has it..28,000 original miles. the engine was factory original the first couple years of racing with headers added. It never blew up.
Think Berijik, Brainbeau , Anderson and others. National record holders
Thanks for the history lesson. Already know about those cars. Olds won A Stock AHRA in 65. And B in NHRA in 66. By 68 they were not the same cars.
PER THE ENGINEERS, who already knew the coming 1968 G400 sucked, were already developing the 68 W31. They had one in a 66 F85 and tested it frequently at Onondaga. That’s the whole reason for the W31. Because the 68 400 sucked.
And as I’ve said already once, the engineers hated that marketing got involved and put Ram Rod on it. That’s fact from guys they designed and built the damn cars. Sorry that goes against your own narrative.
Thanks for the history lesson. Already know about those cars. Olds won A Stock AHRA in 65. And B in NHRA in 66. By 68 they were not the same cars.
PER THE ENGINEERS, who already knew the coming 1968 G400 sucked, were already developing the 68 W31. They had one in a 66 F85 and tested it frequently at Onondaga. That’s the whole reason for the W31. Because the 68 400 sucked.
And as I’ve said already once, the engineers hated that marketing got involved and put Ram Rod on it. That’s fact from guys they designed and built the damn cars. Sorry that goes against your own narrative.
my narrative is historically correct facts with proof to back it up. you have old wives tales here say….bordering on fairy tales.
Woodland/Anderson held the NHRA record for a period of time which was 12.20’s Pete Kost in a 69 W30 convertible also held a class record at 12.4
in June of 68 two different W30’s held the class record in D/S and D/SA
the 400G that you proclaim was uncompetitive and sucked..was a feared combination back then..that’s my narrative…truth and facts.
I’ll also post an article of a stick D/S W30 clicking off an 11.9
Hi guys, I'm new here. I want to build a Ram Rod 350 clone. I have a 1976 350 Cutlass S engine. Are the crank and rods the same? I read the post and of course the pistons, heads, intake, and balancer are different but I want to get close. Possible with this engine??
Any inputs please.
The crank is weaker but should be fine, especially behind an automatic with reasonable stall. The rods are basically the same. You can use flat top pistons but your #8 heads have about 10cc bigger chambers and need a bowl cutter under the valves to flow as well. You will be around 9 to 1 compression, not the 10+ to 1 the W31 had. You also want headers, the first thing swapped would be the poor flowing log factory exhaust manifolds.
Hi guys, I'm new here. I want to build a Ram Rod 350 clone. I have a 1976 350 Cutlass S engine. Are the crank and rods the same? I read the post and of course the pistons, heads, intake, and balancer are different but I want to get close. Possible with this engine??
Any inputs please.
it’s probably one of the easiest engines to build as a clone.
we can give you specific specs , part numbers and walk you through it.
best to start off with a 68 through 69 engine with the heads you need. it’ll have the N crank and the heads you want to start with.
Thanks. So the crank has the same specs but is weaker. Is it cast? I can get aftermarket heads and an aluminum intake. Not stock but better. Appreciate the input. Best gas here is 91.
Yes, the crank is just grey iron and lighter. A guy on here with a 450 HP 403 and a 6 spd manual broke one in 3. The harmonic balancer, special carb and distributor will be expensive but aren't necessary. Get a new aftermarket or reconditioned normal balancer, your factory Quadrajet carb custom tuned and something like an expensive but unique Progression ignition to get the best idle quality and performance. The W31 cam is available but power brakes will be a challenge with it. Until the new Edelbrock heads come out, no current aftermarket head will have a proper combustion chamber size to have the proper compression. Also get a Performer RPM, don't waste money on a Performer intake. I would go with the DSS 3cc forged piston over the old Speedpro, lighter and a more modern ring pack. Internal balancing is best but requires a neutral balance flexplate and balancer, Hayes were on clearance and Mallory metal is very expensive. You don't want to know how much I spent on internal balancing. Compression and an aggressive cam were what really made the W31 what it was. Yes there was other tweaks and improvements and modern parts can actually make more power over the factory motor.
Last edited by olds 307 and 403; Sep 24, 2024 at 06:22 AM.
Thanks. So the crank has the same specs but is weaker. Is it cast? I can get aftermarket heads and an aluminum intake. Not stock but better. Appreciate the input. Best gas here is 91.
around 76 was the last year for the good #395558 casting 350 blocks. you could also have the good Nodular iron crank…if it’s the 395558 block
wont know until you check to be sure.
you aren’t building a clone if you’re going to use aftermarket heads and intake. Factory #5 and #6 heads are not that hard to find. you can also use the factory aluminum late intake cast #A4. it’ll looks similar to the factor W31 and flows the same.
around 76 was the last year for the good #395558 casting 350 blocks. you could also have the good Nodular iron crank…if it’s the 395558 block
wont know until you check to be sure.
you aren’t building a clone if you’re going to use aftermarket heads and intake. Factory #5 and #6 heads are not that hard to find. you can also use the factory aluminum late intake cast #A4. it’ll looks similar to the factor W31 and flows the same.
like this..could pass as a pretty good clone
Dale have you seen a 'N" crank in the later engines? You no doubt have looked at a lot more Olds V8's than I have. Both my 76 350 definitely did not have a "N" crank along both both my 403’s or any 307 I have seen, a handful with the pan off. Even my 73 350, while the crank looked beefier and was a slightly different color still had no "N" on it. Even the members on here could not answer if t was a N crank. The A4 should be plentiful states side, rare up here. Of course he will need to make a EGR block off plate. Milling his #8 heads about .060" using a W31 intake valve, a bowl hog cutter under the valves should mimic the W31 heads close enough, just add the proper springs if he can't find early heads locally. It sounds like he just wants a loose clone, it depends how hard he plans on beating on the motor, whether the 76 crank will live.
Thanks. This site is great, lots of very helpful members. Now I can't wait to pull the motor and look for the numbers. I drove it off the lot new. It was a great running car, and I took care of it. The oil still looks clean. I originally had it in New Orleans then drove it to my first duty station in the California desert. A double whammy on the body. Too far gone to restore as a 76. Besides that, it would have to have all the original smog equipment to register it. Here is a picture.
Last edited by Choadicus; Sep 25, 2024 at 08:07 AM.