General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

New pics...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 14th, 2018, 02:47 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,445
New pics...

Thought I would share some updated pics of my 72 Cutlass Supreme engine and interior...








Last edited by 72455; October 14th, 2018 at 02:51 PM.
72455 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 02:51 PM
  #2  
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
redoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 10,268
Interesting thread.
redoldsman is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 02:54 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,445
Originally Posted by redoldsman
Interesting thread.
Lol...you may have caught me tapping the submit button by accident😀 Check it again...

​​​​
72455 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 02:56 PM
  #4  
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
redoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 10,268
I thought that is probably what it was but just had to pull your chain a little. Car looks very nice.
redoldsman is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 06:47 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,701
Hmm. PCV valve T-eed into the brake booster vacuum line. I wonder why someone did that?
Fun71 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 07:11 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,445
Originally Posted by Fun71
Hmm. PCV valve T-eed into the brake booster vacuum line. I wonder why someone did that?
I dunno but I started this thread https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-part-two.html
a while back and no one seemed to mention it was an issue. Did I miss something?
72455 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 07:30 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,701
Wow, you had so much incorrect information being corrected in that thread it's no wonder no one noticed the PCV connection.
It will work the way it is currently, but it's not the way is should be connected.
Fun71 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 07:40 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,432
Originally Posted by Fun71
Hmm. PCV valve T-eed into the brake booster vacuum line. I wonder why someone did that?
Originally Posted by 72455
I dunno but I started this thread https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-part-two.html
a while back and no one seemed to mention it was an issue. Did I miss something?
In your previous thread, you said this:
Originally Posted by 72455
My friend said to ditch the oil breather cap and use another pcv valve, tie it into the other one and run that to intake vacuum. He also said to run the brake booster vacuum by itself into the carb.
Your friend is right, and Fun71 is correct to point it out. The brake booster should be connected to its own port on the back of the carburetor, and the PCV is connected to a separate port. That's the way it was set up when the car left the factory. It's not a performance issue or better mileage issue, it's a safety issue. The brakes are a safety system. You want there to be as few ways as possible for there to be vacuum loss by the booster. The more tees and fittings and other devices connected to the same vacuum line as the booster, the more ways the booster can fail. In your setup, there are three new ways the booster can fail that weren't there when the car left the factory. There is a tee in the line that wasn't there before, there is a hose running off that tee to the PCV, and there is the PCV itself. Failure by any one of those three, as remote as the possibility might be, would fail the booster and cause a loss of braking ability.

The brake booster line didn't have a plastic loom on it, either, when it left the factory. That may look cool, but it prevents easy observation of the condition of that vacuum line. It's one thing to put a loom on a vacuum line that controls the vent doors in the heating system or that connects to the cruise control. Failure of either of those is an inconvenience but not a safety issue. It's another thing to put a loom on the brake booster vacuum hose.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 07:48 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
72455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 3,445
Originally Posted by jaunty75
In your previous thread, you said this:
Your friend is right, and Fun71 is correct to point it out. The brake booster should be connected to its own port on the back of the carburetor, and the PCV is connected to a separate port. That's the way it was set up when the car left the factory. It's not a performance issue or better mileage issue, it's a safety issue. The brakes are a safety system. You want there to be as few ways as possible for there to be vacuum loss by the booster. The more tees and fittings and other devices connected to the same vacuum line as the booster, the more ways the booster can fail. In your setup, there are three new ways the booster can fail that weren't there when the car left the factory. There is a tee in the line that wasn't there before, there is a hose running off that tee to the PCV, and there is the PCV itself. Failure by any one of those three, as remote as the possibility might be, would fail the booster and cause a loss of braking ability.

The brake booster line didn't have a plastic loom on it, either, when it left the factory. That may look cool, but it prevents easy observation of the condition of that vacuum line. It's one thing to put a loom on a vacuum line that controls the vent doors in the heating system or that connects to the cruise control. Failure of either of those is an inconvenience but not a safety issue. It's another thing to put a loom on the brake booster vacuum hose.
Got it and thanks for the info. I'll take care of it ASAP. I think there is a vacuum port in the front of the carb. Can I run my pcv hose to that?
72455 is offline  
Old October 14th, 2018, 08:16 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,432
Originally Posted by 72455
Got it and thanks for the info. I'll take care of it ASAP. I think there is a vacuum port in the front of the carb. Can I run my pcv hose to that?
Yes, as long as it's down low on the carburetor. Or you can run it to a port on the intake manifold. You want manifold vacuum (not ported vacuum). The PCV vacuum line is typically relatively large inside diameter, and you want a port that matches that size hose. Don't use a hose size reducer so you can use a smaller diameter port as the vacuum capacity isn't as large, and the PCV needs a good vacuum.

I have found this video to be useful. As I recall, you don't have a Quadrajet on your engine, but this would probably still be useful for you to watch as he explains the purpose of all the vacuum ports on a Quadrajet, and it's likely applicable to most replacements. He speaks slowly, and sometimes so slowly that you want to yell at the computer screen, but it's still worth watching.


Last edited by jaunty75; October 14th, 2018 at 08:19 PM.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old October 15th, 2018, 06:48 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
muscle_collector's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 19
you want an original 4 spoke rallye steering wheel for it? I got a pretty nice one for $195.00 including the hub and center cap. plus shipping .
muscle_collector is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gerald Nickels
Big Blocks
13
February 22nd, 2021 08:44 PM
cutlassgal
General Discussion
4
May 3rd, 2013 07:28 PM
Olds65
General Discussion
1
August 11th, 2012 06:55 AM
WolfRyder
General Discussion
3
September 10th, 2010 05:20 PM
bonezarally
General Discussion
0
August 10th, 2010 07:16 PM



Quick Reply: New pics...



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:59 AM.