General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Maybe A Stupid Question? Small Block Intake vs Big Block Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 30th, 2017, 08:53 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
junkmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 81
Maybe A Stupid Question? Small Block Intake vs Big Block Intake

Ok guys Im new to this forum and before you possibly murder me for my possibly stupid question hear me out. I had a great passion for early Oldsmobile V8s before I joined this forum Im well educated on the Kettering 1949-64 V8s 303 324 371 394s but Im a little green on later Olds V8s and their differences. Know plenty about Chevy SBC BBC but thats kinda pointless here. Anyway basically from what I gather from SBO vs BBO is the valve covers are the same but intakes are not interchangeable due to the BB higher deck height so it requires a fatter intake to compensate. Im working on a 72 Cutlass with a 350 so small block stuff is what Im after. Anyway Im getting to my question be patient......I picked up a Edelbrock OL4B which is small block I know but it has been modified pretty heavy by a ex racer the ports have been raised making them straighter flow and taking out some of the curve of the runners but in doing so its had some serious welding and machining. They did an awesome job I would hate to imagine what it would cost to do all that work and hard to tell unless your looking for it. So due to the mods on it its not exactly the perfect example to compare anything else to measurement wise or looking for exacts Im sure it seats fine and everything but comparing it to another intake for verification might be tough. Anyway Im cruising craigslist and come up on a Offy intake that a guy says is for 400 455 for what I bought it for I couldnt pass it up figured worse case scenario I would sell it and make a buck or trade it for something I need or want. Anyway I get the Offenhauser intake home and compare it to the Edelbrock intake just to be sure its not a small block and I be damned I think it is but want to verify with someone more knowledgeable than me. Like I said tough to compare it straight up to the Edelbrock due to the mods on it. And the Offy seems to be pretty early its a 360 degree dual port but it says "patent pending" above the dual port print and I looked for a part number on the bottom like 99% of Offy intakes but a blank pad no number. So I dont have a part number to cross reference and I've looked over Google images and cant find another like it. Anyway the Offy intake is it small block or big block Olds? And if you got this far thru the post without cussing me or saying dumbass heres a couple of bonus questions if the Offy is small block which would you run on a stock motor the Edelbrock or the Offy? Heres the pics. Sorry if I'm an idiot to some. Thanks for the replies and info in advance guys.

Side note if the Offy is a big block Im open to trading on a aftermarket small block intake and also if someone has a hard on for the Edelbrock OL4B I would trade it also. Have a nice day thanks.
Attached Images
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0760.jpeg (226.5 KB, 75 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0761.jpeg (226.4 KB, 71 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0762.jpeg (220.7 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0763.jpeg (190.0 KB, 61 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0764.jpeg (188.4 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0765.jpeg (222.7 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0766.jpeg (229.6 KB, 63 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0767.jpeg (231.9 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0768.jpeg (253.2 KB, 61 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0769.jpeg (247.9 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0770.jpeg (206.3 KB, 61 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0771.jpeg (249.6 KB, 64 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0772.jpeg (194.6 KB, 62 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0773.jpeg (202.1 KB, 60 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0774.jpeg (201.5 KB, 56 views)
File Type: jpeg
KIMG0775.jpeg (254.3 KB, 70 views)
junkmanjr is offline  
Old May 30th, 2017, 09:15 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Grass Valley Ca
Posts: 973
It's hard to tell from the pictures,but the offy intake appears to be the same width as the ol4b low deck aka small block intake.
nsnarsk65cutlass is offline  
Old May 30th, 2017, 09:19 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
junkmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 81
Thanks for the the reply thats what I was thinking everyone is whos read is probably thinking why the hell dont you just try and bolt it down to the motor well thats a problem cause the cars about 4 hours away right now.............oops kinda forgot to mention that in the first post
junkmanjr is offline  
Old May 30th, 2017, 11:23 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
VI Cutty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Vancouver Island, Canada
Posts: 1,482
BBO intake measures about 14" across at the top back end while the SBO is about 12"...so width should help you determine application.

Looks like one is single plane while the other is dual...about all I know about that is an awareness that the different setups perform differently and I believe the intended driving/power results would determine which is the better option.

There, I'm done!
VI Cutty is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 05:46 AM
  #5  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
See Here: https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...-pictures.html



- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 31st, 2017, 06:00 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,311
As noted, an SBO intake is about 12.5" wide. A BBO is about 14" wide. The Offy is a gimmick design. Being aluminum it doesn't even make a good doorstop. There's a reason why no other intake manufacturer in history has used this design. I would certainly use the OL4B over the Offy.

The only issue is the port work done on the OL4B. I'm having trouble following your description, and the photos aren't terribly helpful. Are you saying that the ports where the manifold mates to the head have been opened up? If so, this was likely done to match the larger BBO ports when using BBO heads on an SBO. The flow mismatch if bolted to stock SBO heads will likely negate any HP gain (or worse).

FYI, if this is the case, I'd be interested in trading you for an untouched OL4B. I plan to run BBO heads on the 403 going in my 64 Vista.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old June 1st, 2017, 08:57 PM
  #7  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 8,919
The OLB4 is another dated design. Mark did a dyno test with the BBO version I believe, didn't do very well at all. Are the ports welded at the top and opened up bigger? I think only the RPM and Victor SBO intakes have enough material at the top to cover the BBO ports.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2017, 12:22 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
D. Yaros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: SE Wisconsin
Posts: 1,915
Will somebody please help eradicate my ignorance.

What in the heck do SBO and BBO mean? Is it Short Block O_____ and Big Block O_____?

Thanks!
D. Yaros is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2017, 12:26 PM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,311
Originally Posted by D. Yaros
Will somebody please help eradicate my ignorance.

What in the heck do SBO and BBO mean? Is it Short Block O_____ and Big Block O_____?

Thanks!
Hint:

SBC = Small Block Chevy, BBF = Big Block Ford, and the name of this forum is ClassicOldsmobile.com.

Do the math.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2017, 03:06 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
oldolds88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: laingsburg mi
Posts: 1,453
looks like all the runners were welded on. maybe added on to the small block runners straighten and lengthen them, to fit the big block?
oldolds88 is offline  
Old June 2nd, 2017, 04:01 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,762
Originally Posted by oldolds88
looks like all the runners were welded on. maybe added on to the small block runners straighten and lengthen them, to fit the big block?
It didn't look like there was an additional 2" welded on to me.

Originally Posted by VI Cutty
BBO intake measures about 14" across at the top back end while the SBO is about 12"
Fun71 is online now  
Old June 2nd, 2017, 06:06 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
junkmanjr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Knoxville TN
Posts: 81
Well I think I got my answer the thread was kinda started to id whether the offy was for a small block or not, got that answered. Best I can tell on the OL4B is they raised the ports for racing I assume the ports are about about 2.5 inches tall and 1.5 wide. They altered the flow of the runners I guess to take some of the curvature out of the runners and make the gas flow more staight to the heads. When they altered the flow pattern they had to cut some stuff off the top and replaced it accordingly to achieve what they were trying to do. I wouldve hated to pay the bill on that work
junkmanjr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
auto_editor
General Discussion
2
April 26th, 2013 05:19 PM
gearheads78
General Discussion
36
December 18th, 2009 06:15 AM
crazy-steve
The Newbie Forum
6
August 31st, 2009 06:36 AM
442_Mustang
The Clubhouse
3
April 30th, 2009 06:56 PM
DonFrost
Small Blocks
6
January 6th, 2007 06:47 AM



Quick Reply: Maybe A Stupid Question? Small Block Intake vs Big Block Intake



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.