General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Horse power!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 04:34 PM
  #1  
crank shaft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Horse power!

Does anyone know how the factory figures horsepower ratings on engines? I was just wondering if the figure it at the crank or at the wheels.
Thank you
Mike
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
It was a standard that measures flywheel horsepower. The standard has changed over the years but all are flywheel based.
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 04:51 PM
  #3  
crank shaft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Thank you, That clears things up for me, I just couldn't figure out how a the 455 had so many different horsepower ratings for the pre. 73 smog engines.
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 04:56 PM
  #4  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
Don't forget that in the 60's and early 70's fudging of numbers was common by all manufacturers. Case in point: 1970 Toronado GT rated at 400hp while the 1970 W-30 442 is rated at only 370hp yet it has a much larger cam. Although I believe the Toronado figures the W-30 is clearly skewed. Probably for insurance reasons.
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 05:03 PM
  #5  
crank shaft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
OK so 1970 W-30 had 370 hp at the crank, so if it had a automatic trans, I figure the hp at the rear wheels would be 297 hp according to my hp calculator.
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 05:10 PM
  #6  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
I guess my point was that the figures for horsepower at the time were inaccurate and skewed for any number of reasons. Although probably correct for some models others were not. Trying to figure out a real number is probably futile.
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 05:13 PM
  #7  
crank shaft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
I got, Thank you!
Old Apr 22, 2015 | 06:10 PM
  #8  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
I remember a discussion about the published horsepower numbers where one of the Daves (can't remember which one) said his W-31, rated 325 HP from the factory, actually dynoed at 325 HP @ 5400 RPM but it kept increasing from there. I think he said it hit 360 HP @ ~5800 RPM before something happened with the dyno. He also said he regularly ran it well over 6000 RPM.

Last edited by Fun71; Apr 24, 2015 at 11:27 AM.
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 10:59 AM
  #9  
455man's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,070
From: Wichita, Ks
I think it was 1972 when they changed the way they measure the hp. They started putting all the accessories on the engine and I believe manifolds instead of headers for the dyno. There is a thread about all this somewhere on here.
Old Apr 24, 2015 | 04:47 PM
  #10  
GEARMAN69's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,484
From: ENNIS TEXAS
Yes, 1972 was when the rating method changed to reflect accessories hooked up and exhaust as well. I believe it also was now measured at the tailshaft of tranny instead of flywheel but not sure on that part. For comparison a 1971 and 1972 Pontiac 400 4 barrel dual exhaust engines are virtually identical specs and both 8.2:1. The 1971 is rated 300 bhp and the 1972 SAE Net HP was rated 250 so this should give you a good idea of the power losses in the way it's measured . Also of interest is in the 72-74 years the Chilton's manual lists single exhaust and dual exhaust differing HP ratings on some 2 barrel and 4 barrel engines. Then of course the 1975 pellet style Catalytic converter on all just killed it besides the further lowering of compression ratios.

Last edited by GEARMAN69; Apr 25, 2015 at 06:50 AM.
Old Apr 25, 2015 | 06:50 AM
  #11  
crank shaft's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 248
From: Cleveland, Ohio
Thank you guys!
Old Apr 25, 2015 | 07:53 AM
  #12  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
you may notice that the published HP figures circa 1970 are CONVEEEEEEENIENTLY
maxed out at 1 HP per 10 lbs of vehicle. 400 HP in 4000 lb Toro; 370 HP in 3700 lb 442. HP readings produced and recorded can be tailored to suit the needs at the time. Select the RPM you read at, vary the timing, intake air temp, engine temp, etc. You tell me the W30 motor should make 370 HP and I can provide that result. Assuming of course that actual capabilities with everything optimized is at least that large.
Old Apr 25, 2015 | 10:43 AM
  #13  
jfb's Avatar
jfb
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 776
From: chicago il
I agree with all comments but another factor might have been available rpm. I have heard of a lot of spun bearings especially oldsmobiles and Pontiacs. I also agree that back then they downplayed the horsepower for insurance purposes. I grew up in the late eightys early nineties and iwas racing and always enjoying these car and my insurance was for liability about 120 a mth and no crashes. remember the technology then was compression and rpm plus a supporting cast behind it and below.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Texas Jim
Big Blocks
17
Jan 11, 2011 09:41 AM
808olds
Big Blocks
21
Sep 20, 2010 05:10 AM
olds4life
Big Blocks
3
Sep 8, 2009 08:57 AM
diablo76delta88
Eighty-Eight
4
Feb 17, 2009 10:57 AM
topjimmy19
Big Blocks
1
Oct 28, 2007 06:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:30 PM.