Factory Balance on the rotating assm.
Factory Balance on the rotating assm.
Speaking on factory OEM parts here
Given the fact these are production line engine assemblies. Are the cranks and rod/piston assm. made and or machined to the same spec.? Meaning on the engine assm. line say an olds 400 1968-69 were all the rod/pistons the same weight? as any factory rod/piston assm for a 400 motor could go into another motor without a balance problem.
I weighed a few sets(8) of 400 rod/piston assm. and found them all the same weight(Bob weight). Did the same on a few sets of 350 rod/piston assm and found them also to be consistant . This would make sense on a production line.
The factory manuals do not reference a complete rebalance if a rod and or piston needs to be replaced.
To ask the question simpler. Again talking all OEM, no machine work done after the factory. Could you put a complete set of 350 OEM piston/rod assm. onto another factory OEM 350 crank. Without a balance problem?
I also understand factory balance is not perfect either
Given the fact these are production line engine assemblies. Are the cranks and rod/piston assm. made and or machined to the same spec.? Meaning on the engine assm. line say an olds 400 1968-69 were all the rod/pistons the same weight? as any factory rod/piston assm for a 400 motor could go into another motor without a balance problem.
I weighed a few sets(8) of 400 rod/piston assm. and found them all the same weight(Bob weight). Did the same on a few sets of 350 rod/piston assm and found them also to be consistant . This would make sense on a production line.
The factory manuals do not reference a complete rebalance if a rod and or piston needs to be replaced.
To ask the question simpler. Again talking all OEM, no machine work done after the factory. Could you put a complete set of 350 OEM piston/rod assm. onto another factory OEM 350 crank. Without a balance problem?
I also understand factory balance is not perfect either
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



