General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

disconnect secondaries for better mpg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 12th, 2013, 05:13 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hastingsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hastings Mi.(South of Grand Rapids)
Posts: 34
disconnect secondaries for better mpg?

The gas prices are killing me! My '72 Cutlass Supreme drop-top is just sitting, waiting for something less than $4.45 per gallon. Is it feasible to disconnect the secondaries on the QJet temporarily so we can cruise once in a while? It's too pretty to be a dust collector!

Has anyone tried this? Or should I just plan on robbing my grandkids' college funds?

Thanks- Jon
hastingsman is offline  
Old June 12th, 2013, 05:39 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jpc647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,452
Could just not push the pedal down so hard, and the secondaries won't open?
jpc647 is offline  
Old June 12th, 2013, 06:16 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
1970supremevert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 478
see attached prior posting...credit to original poster

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...g-picture.html
1970supremevert is offline  
Old June 12th, 2013, 06:20 PM
  #4  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by jpc647
Could just not push the pedal down so hard, and the secondaries won't open?
Yup.

Just put a block of wood under the gas pedal.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old June 12th, 2013, 06:29 PM
  #5  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,556
Jon, don't get me wrong and I apologize for being blunt. IMHO, if you don't have the money for the occasional cruise you need to sell the car and sit on the couch and watch the Velocity channel.

A 2V carb might gain you a couple of mpg but then there's the expense of that.

Last edited by oldcutlass; June 12th, 2013 at 06:32 PM.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old June 12th, 2013, 06:45 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
I Rochester 2 BBL has bigger bores than a QJet primary. You'd actually lose mileage. I bet you could do 80-100 mph on the primary side of a QJet before the secondaries kicked in. Mileage is all about how you drive it. If you want better mileage get a vacuum gauge and always drive at the highest reading you can. I could get 19 mpg out of my 70 Toronado on the highway. But if you want to have fun then gas mileage shouldn't be your goal.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old June 12th, 2013, 08:54 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Originally Posted by TripDeuces
Rochester 2 BBL has bigger bores than a QJet primary. You'd actually lose mileage. Mileage is all about how you drive it. If you want better mileage get a vacuum gauge and always drive at the highest reading you can. I could get 19 mpg out of my 70 Toronado on the highway.
My experience as well. Qjets were always good for mileage if you babied them. Could be lots of other issues at play, though, to create bad mileage. I've had heat riser valves that didn't open fully, and other exhaust restrictions. Timing issues, brakes dragging, engine not at right temperature can cause inefficiencies. Even slipping trannies have caused me loss. It's really easy in this hectic world to miss some of the obvious culprits. I had a 64 Riv with bad mileage for six years. Wasn't until I sold it we noticed there wasn't even a thermostat in it. I changed the water pump when it went, but was so busy with my other cars, I never got to checking the simple things.
HonestDave is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 02:22 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
kitfoxdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: treasure coast FL
Posts: 695
if you want MPG, get a Vespa... if you want FUN keep the OLDS! Don't let those dinosours die in vain!
kitfoxdave is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 02:44 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
dancutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Munich, Germany
Posts: 390
$4,45 a gallon sounds like heaven to me! $8,50 here and I still enjoy driving my Olds..
In my opinion if you really love your car and you love driving in it, there's always a way to safe money elsewhere to drive your Olds once in a while
dancutlass is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 05:05 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
Doc350s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ajax, Ontario
Posts: 93
I'm with Dan. I pay about $7 a gallon up here in Canada and that's when it's cheaper.
Doc350s is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 05:18 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Originally Posted by Doc350s
I'm with Dan. I pay about $7 a gallon up here in Canada and that's when it's cheaper.
My God !! I haven't done the math lately. It's $1.43 a litre, and I've been thinking around $5 a gallon. You're right, it's closer to $7, maybe more if you use premium. No wonder I'm spending so much at the gas stations.
HonestDave is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 07:58 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,423
I don't think you'll find any carb that will drop onto your engine & get better mileage than a Qjet on the primaries. Even most 2 barrels are apt to be worse for mileage.

Car will do nearly anything you want it to on primaries. I left my secondaries tied shut after some tuning & forgot about it, iirc car ran 13.2 @ 98 consistently w/ no change in normal driving.

Keep your foot out of it & you are driving a very precise 2 barrel that will be as miserly as your tune allows.
bccan is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 08:24 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
Short of efi, the Qjet is probably the most efficient carb out there. The secondaries will not open until you push the pedal down far enough.
Check and make sure your ignition is working correctly, mechanical and vacuum advance. A shortened timing curve that has more initial advance can help a little bit.
Other than that, an OD trans is your best bet to increase hiway milage.
garys 68 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 08:26 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
chadman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Wakeman, OH
Posts: 1,063
The best thing you can do for fuel economy is to get a wideband O2 gauge and tune your carb in. That and an adjustable vacuum advance canister.
chadman is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 08:32 AM
  #15  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Getting into this more deeply, I've often wondered about the practicality of substituting a much stronger spring on the secondaries, to make it obvious when I was getting into them, but I've never actually tried to do it.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 09:10 AM
  #16  
Just the facts...
 
BILL DEMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: THE GREAT WIDE-OPEN
Posts: 1,259
with a '72 carb. you can fab up a piece to hold your secondary air valves closed-if you're serious about this. don't go bending on the existing lockout lever, after a couple of bends, the arm will break off and you'll be screwed.


bill
BILL DEMMER is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 11:14 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
brown7373's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, FL
Posts: 1,124
Unless I missed it, what kind of mpg are you getting now?
brown7373 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 02:44 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
BlackGold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 1,587
Many of you are recommending that Hastingsman simply not step on the gas pedal hard enough to open the secondaries. What you may be missing is that this will also prevent him from fully using his primaries. The secondaries start opening at half-throttle on the primaries. The primaries don't fully open until the secondaries do as well -- at full pedal travel.

I like the idea of somehow preventing the secondary air valve from opening.

Let me rephrase that. I don't like the idea at all. But if someone wants to improve their gas mileage, that's probably a good way to do it.
BlackGold is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 03:04 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
Not exactly... The circuits in a carb generally get progressively richer. Preventing the secondaries from opening and adding fuel will result in a lean condition on the primaries in heavy throttle. Would you suggest blocking the enrichment circuit (rods) and accelerator pump too?
A light foot and tuned carb/ignition will probably be a better approach.

Originally Posted by BlackGold
Many of you are recommending that Hastingsman simply not step on the gas pedal hard enough to open the secondaries. What you may be missing is that this will also prevent him from fully using his primaries. The secondaries start opening at half-throttle on the primaries. The primaries don't fully open until the secondaries do as well -- at full pedal travel.

I like the idea of somehow preventing the secondary air valve from opening.

Let me rephrase that. I don't like the idea at all. But if someone wants to improve their gas mileage, that's probably a good way to do it.
garys 68 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 05:09 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hastingsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hastings Mi.(South of Grand Rapids)
Posts: 34
Thank you, one and all, for the input. Just for the record, you couldn't offend me if you tried. I asked for ideas. I know the primaries on a Qjet are smaller than those of a 2 bbl., and that's why I was hoping to TEMPORARILY stop the secondaries from working. I don't want to change carbs.
At this point, I am getting 15 mpg highway with the rebuilt 350. Only changes on the rebuild are hardened seats and an RV cam, plus true dual exhaust. I think I will try to super-tune it, maybe install some split-fire plugs. They seemed to improve performance and mileage on a Firebird years ago.
I like the overdrive trans idea, but this one has a recent rebuild.
I am retired, singing the fixed income blues, but I simply can't see giving up the hobby. I'll play a bit and see what happens. -Jon
hastingsman is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 05:22 PM
  #21  
71 cutlass convertible
 
lshlsh2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Trappe, MD
Posts: 2,018
What rear end ratio do you have? I'm sure someone has a 2.56 that they would let go cheap.

Larry
lshlsh2 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 05:39 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Nilsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,076
I get 9-10mpg, and I drive may be 3-4000 miles a year. You get 15 which I consider good mileage.
Nilsson is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 06:35 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Napoleon1991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wheaton, IL
Posts: 245
Originally Posted by nilsson
i get 9-10mpg, and i drive may be 3-4000 miles a year. You get 15 which i consider good mileage.
x2
Napoleon1991 is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 07:09 PM
  #24  
Just the facts...
 
BILL DEMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: THE GREAT WIDE-OPEN
Posts: 1,259
Originally Posted by garys 68
Not exactly... The circuits in a carb generally get progressively richer. Preventing the secondaries from opening and adding fuel will result in a lean condition on the primaries in heavy throttle. Would you suggest blocking the enrichment circuit (rods) and accelerator pump too?
A light foot and tuned carb/ignition will probably be a better approach.
not in a quadrajet. the primaries will continue to function normally without the secondaries.
unless the original poster proves me wrong, i'm of the opinion that the secondaries won't flow any fuel without the venturi effect in the secondaries.


bill
BILL DEMMER is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 07:21 PM
  #25  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,556
Here, I'll make you feel better, cruising around town I get 6mpg and run 93 octane. 15 is pretty good, I'd save my money on the split fires and run NGk, A/C, or Autolite. Give it a good tune and keep a fresh aircleaner on it. Make sure your tires are aired up, and you might squeeze a couple more MPG out of it.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old June 13th, 2013, 08:30 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
hookem horns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 878
Assume you have a daily driver other than the Olds. Think about what you can do to make that one sip gas so you can enjoy the Olds when you do take her out on the town. 15 mpg is pretty good for these old cars, and an occasional "italian tuneup" is good for the soul (the car and yours).
hookem horns is offline  
Old June 13th, 2013, 09:46 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
15 is pretty good. I've got efi, a 4 speed, with 2.73 rear end and get low 20s for mpg. An OD trans is expensive, but 10 bolt rear ends are pretty cheap. You could swap out the rear for a lower ratio, but don't expect more than a few percent improvement.
garys 68 is offline  
Old June 14th, 2013, 09:01 AM
  #28  
Registered User
 
455man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Wichita, Ks
Posts: 1,070
You might try some cold air induction like the 442's had under the bumpers. Headers would help get that exhaust out. I was able to get 20mpg with a 350 then 15 with my 455.
455man is offline  
Old June 14th, 2013, 05:46 PM
  #29  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hastingsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hastings Mi.(South of Grand Rapids)
Posts: 34
20 mpg would be GREAT! I'm going header hunting, and I already have a dual snorkel air cleaner from ebay installed. Just have to run the tubing. Thanks much- Jon
hastingsman is offline  
Old June 14th, 2013, 06:41 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,503
This is not the same as blocking the secondaries and not what you are looking to do but this reminds me of what we did. Back in highschool a friend and I took a chevy 350 and stuck a freeze plug into one side of the dual plane manifold. We took out the spark plugs for the cylinders of that plane and drilled out the centers. we attached hoses to the plugs with the holes and ran them to a filter. It had more power than we thought it would. We ran it for a couple months and found it only got 1 to 2 MPG better in town but got 5 MPG better on the highway.
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old June 14th, 2013, 06:50 PM
  #31  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
I've been busy, so not entirely focused on every post here, but I don't think I've seen any mention of the simplest way to disable the secondaries.

All QuadraJets have a secondary air valve lockout that prevents the secondary air valves from opening until the choke is completely off.

All you need to do is latch that little lug into the locked position, probably with a nylon wire tie in most cases, and your secondaries will not operate (carbs with priming jets located below the air valves may pull a little fuel from there - you'd have to check).

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old June 15th, 2013, 03:24 AM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Seff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,591
Originally Posted by hastingsman
20 mpg would be GREAT! I'm going header hunting, and I already have a dual snorkel air cleaner from ebay installed. Just have to run the tubing. Thanks much- Jon
A properly rebuilt and tuned Q-jet, un-castrated, should be in that vicinity with decent gears, careful driving, and a SBO. I did 21 with my setup. Highway, of course.

Last edited by Seff; June 15th, 2013 at 03:29 AM.
Seff is offline  
Old June 15th, 2013, 04:21 AM
  #33  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
hastingsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hastings Mi.(South of Grand Rapids)
Posts: 34
THAT'S what I'm talking about! I figured there had to be a simple temporary fix. I have enjoyed all the comments and suggestions, but this is what I originally wanted to know. Thanks. -Jon
hastingsman is offline  
Old June 15th, 2013, 04:22 AM
  #34  
Registered User
 
bccan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: West Hartford, CT
Posts: 1,423
Disabling the secondaries can be done simply by running a piece of wire (mig, mechanic's, etc) from the pivot arm on air valve shaft (rt rear of carb where vac pull off shaft connects)& tie it off on choke housing. Secondary throttle plates will operate mechanically but not enough air will flow through to draw fuel.

I tune Qjets for 12.5-12.8 WOT w/ cruise anywhere from 14.5-15.8 on PRIMARIES ONLY, basically through selection of primary jets & rods. It is like tuning a stand alone carb, for "normal" use the secondaries would then be untied & reactivated then carb tuned for WOT w/ 12.5-12.8 A/F by using secondary rods.

Only problem is you need an Air/Fuel wideband gauge to do it & probably some parts, ie a set or two of jets & maybe some rods. Primary piston might want 1 touch softer spring w/ cam in there. With headers & RV cam you may be a tad lean already unless float is heavy or overall tune is off.

Dilemma is spending money on rebuilding, recurving, retuning or spendin it driving around. Basically long or short term view. A dist recurve kit is in order (& cheap) either way but if this type of tuning is unrealistic for you, bump the timing up to the top of the pointer (10-14 degrees initial) & use a vac gauge to set idle screws fo max idle vac. You will feel a difference & possibly see a slight increase in mpg.

Last edited by bccan; June 15th, 2013 at 04:27 AM.
bccan is offline  
Old June 15th, 2013, 07:56 PM
  #35  
Just the facts...
 
BILL DEMMER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: THE GREAT WIDE-OPEN
Posts: 1,259
as i stated a while back in this thread, lock out the secondary air valves with a fabbed piece of metal. your era of quadrajet has an air valve lockout lever, messing with it may cause the choke valve to operate improperly. mount a fabbed piece of metal to hold the air valves closed. you can attach it via one of the air horn to float bowl screws that are right in front of the leading edge of the secondary air valves. this way, the air valves will be held closed, very little(if any) fuel will flow from the secondary discharge nozzles OR the secondary accelerator pump ports, and the choke will function properly. later incarnations of the quadrajet had a secondary lockout lever that held the secondary throttle valves closed, not the secondary air valves.


bill
BILL DEMMER is offline  
Old June 17th, 2013, 02:41 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Aceshigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 2,200
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Jon, don't get me wrong and I apologize for being blunt. IMHO, if you don't have the money for the occasional cruise you need to sell the car and sit on the couch and watch the Velocity channel.
Agreed.

Sell it, or put money into a 2004R overdrive transmission.
GM Overdrives came out in 1980 over 30 years ago now.......time to update the car.
Aceshigh is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sampson
Electrical
6
August 17th, 2014 05:57 PM
69'442
General Discussion
8
February 23rd, 2013 12:22 PM
coppercutlass
Small Blocks
2
December 28th, 2011 04:48 PM
fjross
Electrical
14
September 27th, 2010 06:24 AM
cherokee coachworks
Big Blocks
6
April 15th, 2009 10:50 AM



Quick Reply: disconnect secondaries for better mpg?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:42 AM.