General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Assembly line

Old Oct 25, 2016 | 04:49 AM
  #1  
Bfg's Avatar
Bfg
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Assembly line

As the car was going down the line at the factory. Was the body lowered onto the frame with the four speed shifter mounted to the trans already or was it installed after the car was lowered? This is referring to the 64 - 67 cars
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 05:06 AM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
My guess would be that the shifter handle would have to be installed afterwards. There were different shapes depending on if there was a bench seat or not and the bench seat shifter has a pretty good bend in it.
I would think that the shifter and rods would be installed before just for access and adjusted afterwards.
But again, I am only guessing.
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 06:35 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by svnt442
My guess would be that the shifter handle would have to be installed afterwards. There were different shapes depending on if there was a bench seat or not and the bench seat shifter has a pretty good bend in it.
I would think that the shifter and rods would be installed before just for access and adjusted afterwards.
But again, I am only guessing.
Actually, Olds used the same handle for bucket and bench applications, but the answer is still after. There's a reason why the factory Hurst shifter handles snap into the shifter vs. the aftermarket ones retained with two bolts. Snapping it in was MUCH faster on the assembly line.
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 07:15 AM
  #4  
Bfg's Avatar
Bfg
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Does that explain why the hole in the floor for 4 sp. cars is so much bigger than it really needs to be. Then of course you had the small 4 sp. floor hump to cover the large cut out. Just wondering what sequence everything came together. So my guess is that the body was lowered to the frame with the large cut out with all drive train together except shift handle. Do you think the 4 sp. hump was tack welded on at this point or was it put on as the initial cut out was happening?
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 07:20 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bfg
Does that explain why the hole in the floor for 4 sp. cars is so much bigger than it really needs to be. Then of course you had the small 4 sp. floor hump to cover the large cut out. Just wondering what sequence everything came together. So my guess is that the body was lowered to the frame with the large cut out with all drive train together except shift handle. Do you think the 4 sp. hump was tack welded on at this point or was it put on as the initial cut out was happening?
Welding was done before the body got to the assembly line, in fact, before paint even. The sparks from welding would have damaged the interior if it were done that late in the process. The large cutout is there to allow room to remove the shifter for service with the trans in place.
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 07:27 AM
  #6  
Bfg's Avatar
Bfg
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,290
Ok, that makes sense. But why was the initial cut out so large?
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 07:28 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bfg
Ok, that makes sense. But why was the initial cut out so large?
One more time...

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The large cutout is there to allow room to remove the shifter for service with the trans in place.
Old Oct 25, 2016 | 09:15 PM
  #8  
kjr442's Avatar
Kjr442
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,817
From: Texas
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Actually, Olds used the same handle for bucket and bench applications, but the answer is still after. There's a reason why the factory Hurst shifter handles snap into the shifter vs. the aftermarket ones retained with two bolts. Snapping it in was MUCH faster on the assembly line.

My 65 442 club coupe has a four speed / bench setup and the shifter is specific to the bench seat setup.
I am pretty sure there were three or four different shifter handles in 65 and most likely the same up to 72, but I could be off on that part.
Old Oct 26, 2016 | 07:45 AM
  #9  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by kjr442
My 65 442 club coupe has a four speed / bench setup and the shifter is specific to the bench seat setup.
I am pretty sure there were three or four different shifter handles in 65 and most likely the same up to 72, but I could be off on that part.
I should have noted that my response only applied to the 1966-up factory Hurst shifters. The 64-65 Muncie shifters are different and use a bolt-on stick. According to the parts book, there were four different sticks used on the 1964-65 Muncie four speed shifters. 384744 was non-console, 384730 was console, exc. 442 (due to the "442" logo), 390046 for 442 bench seat and 390049 for 442 buckets.

As for the number of different sticks on the Hurst shifter, there was only one shape for 1966-69. It was the same for bucket or bench, console or non-console. There are two part numbers because one said "442" (393713) and one didn't (392965), but the sticks were otherwise identical.

For 70-72 there were two shapes (console and non-console), each with or without the "442" logo.
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 07:34 AM
  #10  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Joe, are you sure there was a "442" shifter after 1969?
Old Oct 28, 2016 | 04:50 PM
  #11  
Bens71442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by Diego
Joe, are you sure there was a "442" shifter after 1969?
Both my 70W-31 4 speed and 71 W-30 Had the Letter "H" engraved at the base of the shifter handle.
Old Oct 29, 2016 | 06:12 AM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bens71442
Both my 70W-31 4 speed and 71 W-30 Had the Letter "H" engraved at the base of the shifter handle.
The W-31 was NOT a 442, so it obviously would not have received the stick with the "442" stamp.
Old Oct 29, 2016 | 07:31 AM
  #13  
Bens71442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 208
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The W-31 was NOT a 442, so it obviously would not have received the stick with the "442" stamp.
Yes I realize that, I was trying to point out that for 1970-1972, that Oldsmobile for 1970 did not use 442 at the base of the shifter as you had noted. Each shifter used a letter H only engraved at the base of the shifter handle during those 3 yeas and no other letters etc. except a lonely letter H.

I cant vouch for the 68's or 69's. I don't recall if they used the "H" or 442.
Old Oct 29, 2016 | 07:37 AM
  #14  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bens71442
Yes I realize that, I was trying to point out that for 1970-1972, that Oldsmobile for 1970 did not use 442 at the base of the shifter as you had noted.
Non-442s NEVER got a stick with "442" on them, so using a W-31 as an example in a discussion about 442 shifters is irrelevant.
Old Oct 29, 2016 | 07:47 AM
  #15  
rob1960's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 845
From: Ohio
'68 & '69 442s had both the "H" & 442 on them. I painted them on mine just to put a little color in the interior
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
olds 442 winter 2012-13 008.jpg (464.7 KB, 18 views)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Del70
General Discussion
24
Dec 7, 2025 02:13 AM
70 ctls
General Questions
3
Mar 17, 2015 09:18 AM
davepnola
Chassis/Body/Frame
4
Dec 2, 2010 09:00 PM
Flye
Parts Wanted
1
Jul 31, 2009 04:03 PM
68conv455
Other
3
May 20, 2008 02:03 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:33 AM.