General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

67 hardtop vs convertible frames

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2021 | 05:51 AM
  #1  
DR_DAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 762
67 hardtop vs convertible frames

Working on a 67 convertible 442. Frame is bad on drivers side. I have a hardtop frame for a temporary replacement to move forward repairing and fitting a few things. Has anyone used a hardtop frame as a temporary solution? Does anyone make the boxed side sections?
Old Jul 9, 2021 | 07:31 AM
  #2  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,793
From: Evansville, IN
Dan, the hardtop frame should hold the car through everything but torsional load. I think you should be ok, but you may want to make some stiffening bars for the body while jacking it and rotating it. I would think it would be ok to just hold the body for repairs, though, from a mechanical eng perspective.

No one makes the closed sections. They're more precise than just hot rod boxing it in. I believe Run to Rund on here cut them out and transplanted them, slowly, weld by weld.

67 also had a "heavy duty frame" which was the convertible frame, under hard tops with that option. Very rare.

Good luck in convertible frame search.
Old Jul 9, 2021 | 09:00 AM
  #3  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Koda is correct. The convertible frame IS a hardtop frame with the reinforcing sections welded to it. If the rust on your is confined to the part that's common with the hardtop frame, you can cut out the convertible reinforcements and weld them to the good hardtop frame. This photo is a 68-72 frame, but the 64-67 frames are similar.


Old Jul 9, 2021 | 11:59 AM
  #4  
DR_DAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 762
Thanks for the replies. I’m well aware of the differences I just need to safely put the body on a good frame to test fit parts etc
Old Jul 9, 2021 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,793
From: Evansville, IN
Originally Posted by Dan A. Macal
Thanks for the replies. I’m well aware of the differences I just need to safely put the body on a good frame to test fit parts etc
I think the hardtop frame will do that for you.
Old Jul 10, 2021 | 09:12 AM
  #6  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,025
with both frames out, it is the best opportunity to grind through the welds holding the boxing sections, and to move them to the hardtop frame. I recommend having a convertible tranny crossmember installed so you get the distance between the rails correct and centered. Differing from 68-up. the 67 frame has double ears on each side for the crossmember, and has rear boxing pieces behind the rear wheels.
Old Jul 10, 2021 | 09:15 AM
  #7  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,025
btw, all convertible frames in '67 were A. O. Smith so don't start with a Pontiac-vended frame. They are easy to tell apart. The latter has welded on pieces on the snout of the front crossmember, and for the front lower A arms. Also a weld joint in front of the rear wheels. Smith frames are all stamped with integral such pieces.
Old Jul 11, 2021 | 12:45 PM
  #8  
DR_DAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 762
After doing some research I’m going to use the hardtop frame with the Hellwig kit. The way Hellwig designed the boxing section is actually stronger than a stock convertible frame and adds more rigid points.
Old Jul 11, 2021 | 01:20 PM
  #9  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Dan A. Macal
After doing some research I’m going to use the hardtop frame with the Hellwig kit. The way Hellwig designed the boxing section is actually stronger than a stock convertible frame and adds more rigid points.
Sorry, but as an aerospace engineer who's been designing structures for the last four decades, Helliwig is full of crap. First, don't confuse "strength" with "stiffness". These are two very different things. Strength is not the problem here, it's stiffness, specifically how much the frame deflects. Bending stiffness of a beam (like the side rails of a car frame) is a function of the cross section shape, area, and material properties. The larger the section in the direction of bending, the stiffer the beam is (this is why taller I-beams are stiffer). The parts of a beam that increase stiffness are primarily the top and bottom caps. The sides simply keep the top and bottom caps in place relative to each other. The Helliwig kit does not provide an increase in the top and bottom caps the way the factory convertible frame reinforcements do.

Torsional stiffness is similarly a function of the "box section" dimensions. The factory convertible reinforcements provide significantly greater torsional stiffness than do the Helliwig parts.

Sorry, you are mistaken. Don't believe marketing BS, especially when it comes from marketing people and not engineers. Once again, the engineers who designed the frame originally were not stupid.

I remain skeptical of a company who pushes those worthless diagonal braces to the front frame horns also.
Old Jul 11, 2021 | 05:36 PM
  #10  
DR_DAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 762
It’s not a diagonal brace. It’s a boxed section that’s dam near exact as the convertible boxes are.
Old Jul 11, 2021 | 05:57 PM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Dan A. Macal
It’s not a diagonal brace. It’s a boxed section that’s dam near exact as the convertible boxes are.
I was talking about this front stiffener that they also offer. I have yet to figure out what it's supposed to do.





Look, their current kit is better than others I've seen. It still isn't identical to the factory stiffeners. I'm not sure what that extra body mount does other than put loads into the body shell that it wasn't designed to carry. I can't tell you by looking at it if their kit provides the same stiffness as OEM or not. It isn't designed to replace a convertible frame, it's designed to provide the appearance of reinforcement for a hardtop. I don't know if their kit accepts the stock convertible trans crossmember or not, for example (their kit for the 68-72 cars definitely does NOT accept the stock crossmember, but the 64-67 kit isn't clear). Since it isn't exactly the same as the OEM reinforcements, the fuel and brake lines on the frame will likely require mods to fit. You've already got a convertible frame that you can probably harvest the reinforcements from. Your money, your call.
Old Jul 11, 2021 | 06:39 PM
  #12  
DR_DAN's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 762
The drivers side factory box is weak. I’m going to measure , take photos, look at everything very careful before I do anything. Those front cross bars do nothing unless they are at the end of the rails.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Chuck2020
Chassis/Body/Frame
3
Dec 10, 2019 08:42 PM
Koda
Parts For Sale
0
May 22, 2018 05:55 PM
1967 Cutty
Parts Wanted
3
Apr 7, 2018 01:07 AM
thermactor
Parts For Sale
2
Oct 13, 2013 06:50 AM
timrocket72
Chassis/Body/Frame
5
Oct 11, 2013 08:54 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:42 AM.