67 Cutlass Supreme fuel gauge
#1
67 Cutlass Supreme fuel gauge
My gauge on my 67 Supreme reads 3/4 when the tank is half full (10 gal) and reads 3/8 when it is near empty. I learned the latter information the hard way. The fuel-reading system used to be good.
Do you think it's the sending unit?
Is the sending unit on top of the tank? If yes, how do you remove/test the wire at the sending unit for testing?
where are the wires running to the sending unit? In the trunk?
Thanks, everybody.
Do you think it's the sending unit?
Is the sending unit on top of the tank? If yes, how do you remove/test the wire at the sending unit for testing?
where are the wires running to the sending unit? In the trunk?
Thanks, everybody.
#2
I would suspect the sending unit.
Do you have a '67 Olds Chassis Service Manual? See Figure 8-5 on page 8-4. The sending unit on a Cutlass is located on the opposite end of the tank from the filler neck. You'll have to jack up the car and get down under it. The sending unit should be accessible without dropping the tank. There are two wires coming off the sending unit. One wire is a ground connection that attaches to the body at some point near the sending unit, and the other wire goes to the gauge at the front of the car. The service manual says "Disconnect gauge wire at tank unit," so I'm assuming it can be disconnected right there.
With only the ground wire disconnected, turn the key ON and observe the gauge. It should go to F or well past it. That's an indication of an open circuit, and that's what you have with the ground wire disconnected. Next, ground the gauge wire you removed from the sending unit, turn the key ON, and observe the gauge. It should go to E. That's an indication of a short-circuit, which is what you have when you ground the sending unit wire.
If the gauge passes both of these tests, there is no problem with the dash gauge or the wiring to it. The next step is to remove the sending unit and test it. Put an ohmmeter across the leads, and it should read 90 ohms when in the full "up" (tank full) position and zero ohms when in the full down (tank empty) position. It may need cleaning or adjustment.
I would normally suggest that, if you're going to remove the sending unit, you might as well just put in a new one. However, I don't know that new ones are available. I checked rockauto just now, and they don't show one for a '67 Cutlass. I have not checked any other sources.
Do you have a '67 Olds Chassis Service Manual? See Figure 8-5 on page 8-4. The sending unit on a Cutlass is located on the opposite end of the tank from the filler neck. You'll have to jack up the car and get down under it. The sending unit should be accessible without dropping the tank. There are two wires coming off the sending unit. One wire is a ground connection that attaches to the body at some point near the sending unit, and the other wire goes to the gauge at the front of the car. The service manual says "Disconnect gauge wire at tank unit," so I'm assuming it can be disconnected right there.
With only the ground wire disconnected, turn the key ON and observe the gauge. It should go to F or well past it. That's an indication of an open circuit, and that's what you have with the ground wire disconnected. Next, ground the gauge wire you removed from the sending unit, turn the key ON, and observe the gauge. It should go to E. That's an indication of a short-circuit, which is what you have when you ground the sending unit wire.
If the gauge passes both of these tests, there is no problem with the dash gauge or the wiring to it. The next step is to remove the sending unit and test it. Put an ohmmeter across the leads, and it should read 90 ohms when in the full "up" (tank full) position and zero ohms when in the full down (tank empty) position. It may need cleaning or adjustment.
I would normally suggest that, if you're going to remove the sending unit, you might as well just put in a new one. However, I don't know that new ones are available. I checked rockauto just now, and they don't show one for a '67 Cutlass. I have not checked any other sources.
#3
Rockauto shows 6 different ones for a 67 Cutlass depending on fuel line requirements:
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...ding+unit,4436
https://www.rockauto.com/en/catalog/...ding+unit,4436
#4
Interesting. You looked under "Cutlass" while I looked under "Cutlass Supreme." If you look under the latter at the rockauto site, no sending units are shown. Shame on rockauto!
Given this, I go back to my first notion. The sending units are all only about $35. Get a new one, install that, and be done with it.
Given this, I go back to my first notion. The sending units are all only about $35. Get a new one, install that, and be done with it.
#5
My gauge on my 67 Supreme reads 3/4 when the tank is half full (10 gal) and reads 3/8 when it is near empty. I learned the latter information the hard way. The fuel-reading system used to be good.
Do you think it's the sending unit?
Is the sending unit on top of the tank? If yes, how do you remove/test the wire at the sending unit for testing?
where are the wires running to the sending unit? In the trunk?
Thanks, everybody.
Do you think it's the sending unit?
Is the sending unit on top of the tank? If yes, how do you remove/test the wire at the sending unit for testing?
where are the wires running to the sending unit? In the trunk?
Thanks, everybody.
Also when you get below 1/2 the needle starts to fluctuate when you make turns or brake, this is also normal. As long as its fluctuating you have fuel going towards E, when the fluctuating stops, so does your engine as you are out of fuel.
#6
But he says that it "used to be good" and apparently only recently started showing 3/4 when it was actually 1/2, 3/8 when it was actually empty, and the car left him high and dry once because of this. It seems that something has changed.
#8
Thanks, everybody. This is all very helpful. I'll test the wiring and gauge as stated above. It sounds easy and i like working on her.
If i remove the sending unit, i will be just as happy to replace it.
OPGI has one- https://www.opgi.com/cutlass/PZ00732/ but there are 2 tube diameters- 5/16 and 3/8. The OPGI guy said 300 cubes+ is 3/8. But i will try to measure (it's a small circumference).
Yes, they are probably not so accurate but now it's really inaccurate. i suppose i could fill up at every 1/2 tank- 150 miles.
If i remove the sending unit, i will be just as happy to replace it.
OPGI has one- https://www.opgi.com/cutlass/PZ00732/ but there are 2 tube diameters- 5/16 and 3/8. The OPGI guy said 300 cubes+ is 3/8. But i will try to measure (it's a small circumference).
Yes, they are probably not so accurate but now it's really inaccurate. i suppose i could fill up at every 1/2 tank- 150 miles.
#12
That's what I said in the previous post. Bending the arm up lets it go lower. Its a potentiometer attached to an arm that varies resistance based on fuel level. The arm is registering higher at both top and bottom ends of the scale. You are changing the position of the scale.
#15
Even if your sender is still working properly, I bet your strainer is gone or clogged. My sock was split right open letting anything into the filter. Cheap insurance to change out the rubber hose and sender o ring while you’re at it.
#16
I bought a new sender unit and will install it. It comes with a new o ring and locking cap. When you say o ring, you mean the o ring to seal the unit into the tank?
How does replacing the rubber hose help?
The Manual says you need tool J-21518. Is that true? Or can you carefully nudge it with a screwdriver or something? What is the best substitute for this tool?
thank you.
How does replacing the rubber hose help?
The Manual says you need tool J-21518. Is that true? Or can you carefully nudge it with a screwdriver or something? What is the best substitute for this tool?
thank you.
#17
Use a chisel (or similar) and a hammer to turn the ring at the ears. Go around tapping each lightly and be extra careful not to shear them off or you're really screwed. I changed the sending unit in my tank, and I still have a similar problem with the gauge you do, so it may not help to change it. I think I'm going to get my gauge rebuilt.
#18
Tiberian Friend- Thanks for the advice. There are lots of working parts to this problem, aren't there? If my new sender doesn't fix the problem i'm going to try (other) Eric's advice and bend the arm. This bending procedure sounds like a real time-suck though- trial and error. I'll report the results.
Charlie
Charlie
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post