General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

67 442 W-30 - vintage newspaper ad

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old March 14th, 2010, 09:40 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
spf1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 155
67 442 W-30 - vintage newspaper ad

From Portland, OR


Last edited by spf1410; March 14th, 2010 at 09:43 PM. Reason: add image
spf1410 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 05:07 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Pretty cool. A dealer with two locations. That had to be unusual.

I like the phone numbers. One is the old letter-number prefix (think "PEnnsylvania 6-5000"), and the other is the more modern all-number prefix.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 05:12 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Jamesbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 17,616
Cool I Noticed the phone number prefix changed from letters to number between 67 and 69
Jamesbo is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 05:16 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Yes, the change was gradual. In the ad, the two prefixes, "BE-2" and "232" are the same, just one with letters and the other all numbers. It looks like the writers of the ad were trying to get people to realize this. Seems kind of civic-minded of them.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 06:14 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
spf1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 155
[quote=jaunty75;157721]Pretty cool. A dealer with two locations. That had to be unusual.

The main store was on SE Grand, the 28th & Sandy location was one of their used cars lots.

The prefix "BE" represented the Belmont district of Portland.
spf1410 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 07:44 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
Neat old add. Remember the letter prefixes wll My first phone number when married was Hunter 4465 seems like a long time ago
citcapp is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 07:50 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Not that I'm saying that you're an old guy (), but that phone number would have only six digits, HU-4465, which was not uncommon going back to the '40s and '50s. I don't know when the country standardized on 7-digit phone numbers, but I see old motel postcards at antique stores from time to time where their phone number is just four digits. The area code system was drawn up in the 1940s.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 09:43 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,022
Strange that the ad did not identify it as a W car or say it was a cut above the standard 442..... I guess I am saying I would have included these exceptions in the ad!
Oldsmaniac is online now  
Old March 15th, 2010, 10:46 AM
  #9  
Registered User
 
My442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,257
A car like that was really expensive when making $1.60 per hour......
My442 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 11:01 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Originally Posted by My442
A car like that was really expensive when making $1.60 per hour......
It's all relative. I don't know the exact base price of a '67 Cutlass with the 442 option, but the most expensive Cutlass that year had a base price of around $3,000. Add a few hundred or whatever to make it a 442, and you're still talking a tenth of what a similar car might cost today. But the minimum wage hasn't risen by a factor of 10 in the same time period, so, if anything, it took a smaller percentage of the average income to buy the average car back in 1966 than it does today.

Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 06:42 PM
  #11  
67w30
 
alsip455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 45
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Strange that the ad did not identify it as a W car or say it was a cut above the standard 442..... I guess I am saying I would have included these exceptions in the ad!


most of olds ads were straight to the point not a lot of hype
alsip455 is offline  
Old March 15th, 2010, 10:29 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
spf1410's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 155
I love where it says "Wild cam" -very old school cool...
spf1410 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:50 AM
  #13  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Originally Posted by jaunty75
It's all relative. I don't know the exact base price of a '67 Cutlass with the 442 option, but the most expensive Cutlass that year had a base price of around $3,000. Add a few hundred or whatever to make it a 442, and you're still talking a tenth of what a similar car might cost today. But the minimum wage hasn't risen by a factor of 10 in the same time period, so, if anything, it took a smaller percentage of the average income to buy the average car back in 1966 than it does today.

Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
Welcome to the obvious train; last stop YOU.

A W30 was not an average car in 1967, and wasn't bought by the average person.

Last edited by aliensatemybuick; March 22nd, 2010 at 07:54 AM.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:53 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
A W30 was not an average car in 1967, and wasn't bought by the average person.
No, but my point still stands. A car costs more TODAY relative to the minimum wage than it did in 1967, and that's true regardless of the car.

Sometimes I think the aliens ate more than your Buick.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:55 AM
  #15  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
You responded as I was editing my post...NOT before. Guess you got nothing better to do than immediately respond to anyone with an opinion that differs from your own.

On EDIT: I'm actually editing THIS post now, lets see if you beat me to the punch again...

Last edited by aliensatemybuick; March 22nd, 2010 at 07:58 AM.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 07:59 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
You responded as I was editing my post...NOT before. Guess you got nothing better to do than respond to anyone who disgres with you.

On EDIT: I'm actually editing THIS post now, lets see if you beat me to the punch again...
I have NO idea what you're talking about. I can only respond to the posts I see. If you change it after the fact, there's nothing I can do. That's why they have the "Preview Post" button at the bottom. Get your message the way you like it before posting it.

Also, I don't mind you disagreeing with me. I just objected to the snarky way you said it while at the same time missing the point.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 08:04 AM
  #17  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
I noted you edited your last post (though quickly enough that it was not indicated as such), Captain Obvious.

Last edited by aliensatemybuick; March 22nd, 2010 at 08:06 AM.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 08:05 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
I understand.
Great. Now we can move on.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 08:10 AM
  #19  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
You just proved my theory. In the 1.5 minutes I took to go back and edit my post (in defiance of your instructions, sorry), you squoze one in.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 08:14 AM
  #20  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,168
Originally Posted by aliensatemybuick
You just proved my theory. In the 1.5 minutes I took to go back and edit my post (in defiance of your instructions, sorry), you squoze one in.
I didn't realize that there was a message gestation period in effect. I thought I could respond to a message as soon as I see it, whether that's five seconds or five years after it's posted. I'll keep this in mind, though, when responding to your posts. I'll let them age for a little while. Maybe, like fine wine, they'll get better.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 09:43 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,843
Many Cutlasses in 67 ran about $4400 sticker price. The W car ads weren't out there until about 1968-9. W30 was just an option code originally and was referred to as outside air induction, cold air package, etc. By the time the W advertising came out and was on the cars, they were less (in my inflammatory opinion) than they were originally. They got heavy and had less visually "trick" stuff like the stamped steel air cleaner "shroud", battery in the trunk, sneaky routing of air intakes, etc.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old March 22nd, 2010, 09:56 AM
  #22  
"me somebody" site member
 
aliensatemybuick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,612
Another thing to consider is that the 5 and even 6 year terms now available for car financing were unheard of in the 60s, with logical consequence in terms of the monthly payment for those who couldn't pay cash.
aliensatemybuick is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kenroberts
The Newbie Forum
7
June 15th, 2015 06:15 PM
1969Hurst
General Discussion
10
December 17th, 2014 07:37 PM
Oldsmaniac
General Discussion
7
July 25th, 2013 01:55 PM
OLDSmobility
General Discussion
9
November 2nd, 2010 06:18 PM
spf1410
General Discussion
5
March 18th, 2010 05:39 AM



Quick Reply: 67 442 W-30 - vintage newspaper ad



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:42 AM.