67 442 W-30 - vintage newspaper ad
#2
Pretty cool. A dealer with two locations. That had to be unusual.
I like the phone numbers. One is the old letter-number prefix (think "PEnnsylvania 6-5000"), and the other is the more modern all-number prefix.
I like the phone numbers. One is the old letter-number prefix (think "PEnnsylvania 6-5000"), and the other is the more modern all-number prefix.
#4
Yes, the change was gradual. In the ad, the two prefixes, "BE-2" and "232" are the same, just one with letters and the other all numbers. It looks like the writers of the ad were trying to get people to realize this. Seems kind of civic-minded of them.
#5
[quote=jaunty75;157721]Pretty cool. A dealer with two locations. That had to be unusual.
The main store was on SE Grand, the 28th & Sandy location was one of their used cars lots.
The prefix "BE" represented the Belmont district of Portland.
The main store was on SE Grand, the 28th & Sandy location was one of their used cars lots.
The prefix "BE" represented the Belmont district of Portland.
#7
Not that I'm saying that you're an old guy (), but that phone number would have only six digits, HU-4465, which was not uncommon going back to the '40s and '50s. I don't know when the country standardized on 7-digit phone numbers, but I see old motel postcards at antique stores from time to time where their phone number is just four digits. The area code system was drawn up in the 1940s.
#10
It's all relative. I don't know the exact base price of a '67 Cutlass with the 442 option, but the most expensive Cutlass that year had a base price of around $3,000. Add a few hundred or whatever to make it a 442, and you're still talking a tenth of what a similar car might cost today. But the minimum wage hasn't risen by a factor of 10 in the same time period, so, if anything, it took a smaller percentage of the average income to buy the average car back in 1966 than it does today.
Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
#11
#13
It's all relative. I don't know the exact base price of a '67 Cutlass with the 442 option, but the most expensive Cutlass that year had a base price of around $3,000. Add a few hundred or whatever to make it a 442, and you're still talking a tenth of what a similar car might cost today. But the minimum wage hasn't risen by a factor of 10 in the same time period, so, if anything, it took a smaller percentage of the average income to buy the average car back in 1966 than it does today.
Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
Plus, keep in mind that Olds didn't target its cars to the minimum wage worker. ANY new car is expensive when you're making minimum wage.
A W30 was not an average car in 1967, and wasn't bought by the average person.
Last edited by aliensatemybuick; March 22nd, 2010 at 07:54 AM.
#14
Sometimes I think the aliens ate more than your Buick.
#15
You responded as I was editing my post...NOT before. Guess you got nothing better to do than immediately respond to anyone with an opinion that differs from your own.
On EDIT: I'm actually editing THIS post now, lets see if you beat me to the punch again...
On EDIT: I'm actually editing THIS post now, lets see if you beat me to the punch again...
Last edited by aliensatemybuick; March 22nd, 2010 at 07:58 AM.
#16
Also, I don't mind you disagreeing with me. I just objected to the snarky way you said it while at the same time missing the point.
#20
I didn't realize that there was a message gestation period in effect. I thought I could respond to a message as soon as I see it, whether that's five seconds or five years after it's posted. I'll keep this in mind, though, when responding to your posts. I'll let them age for a little while. Maybe, like fine wine, they'll get better.
#21
Many Cutlasses in 67 ran about $4400 sticker price. The W car ads weren't out there until about 1968-9. W30 was just an option code originally and was referred to as outside air induction, cold air package, etc. By the time the W advertising came out and was on the cars, they were less (in my inflammatory opinion) than they were originally. They got heavy and had less visually "trick" stuff like the stamped steel air cleaner "shroud", battery in the trunk, sneaky routing of air intakes, etc.
#22
Another thing to consider is that the 5 and even 6 year terms now available for car financing were unheard of in the 60s, with logical consequence in terms of the monthly payment for those who couldn't pay cash.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post